Autodidata @He_Inte_

Stay-at-home boyfriends are the future. This is what real feminism looks like. Women fought for the right to be wage slaves, and now they get to live out their dream. It’s time to step up and provide for their men.

Considering MI6 told the PUBLIC about the plan to invade Ukraine *4-6 months* in advance this doesnt suprise me

The Telegraph @Telegraph

a day ago

MI6 has been named Europe's most powerful intelligence agency, beating rivals in France, Germany and Ukraine. Here's why Britain's spies came out on top ⬇️ telegraph.co.uk/world-news/202…

72 214 1K 860K 424

Honestly, there should be a memorial in Washington DC to all the beautiful girls we've lost to obesity. Every single name carved in stone. It would be fifty times bigger than the Vietnam memorial... The greatest national tragedy of them all.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Militarmente, o Irã tem menos equipamentos e dinheiro que o Brasil E estão dando uma surra nos EUA e em Israel Além disso, o Brasil tem um território muito maior, e a bendita Amazônia. Mas o Irã tem o que realmente importa: militares patriotas. E não tem um Múcio.

Jornal O Globo @JornalOGlobo

3 days ago

Múcio afirma que, em caso de invasão dos EUA, melhor opção é 'abrir o portão': 'Não tem equipamento, nem dinheiro' oglobo.globo.com/politica/notic…

1K 615 4K 616K 253

Origins of Roman aristocratic morality

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

🇧🇷🇺🇸 Em 1993, sob pressão dos EUA para internacionalizar a Terra Yanomami, o Exército Brasileiro fez a Operação Surumu para dissuadir invasões. Já em 2026, o cenário mudou: o Ministro da Defesa, José Múcio, afirmou que as forças armadas vão "abrir o portão" caso os EUA decidam invadir o Brasil. Nos anos 90, sob o ápice da pressão dos EUA para internacionalizar a Terra Yanomami e após boatos da presença de soldados de forças especiais dos EUA na Guiana, o Exército Brasileiro deflagrou a Operação Surumu em setembro de 1993, em Roraima, reunindo milhares de soldados, helicópteros, blindados e caças em um grande exercício militar, com o objetivo de demonstrar força para dissuadir qualquer tentativa de invasão. Logo após a Surumu, o clima de vigilância preventiva continuou e gerou exercícios ainda maiores na região Norte para simular resistência contra forças tecnologicamente superiores, com a Operação Tarauacá (1995) movimentando mais de 6.000 homens nos estados do Acre e do Amazonas, utilizando forças de elite como paraquedistas e comandos especializados em selva para simular a expulsão de um invasor fictício. Agora, em 2026, a situação volta a se repetir com reiteradas ameaças e pressões dos EUA, mas ao invés de demonstrar força, o Ministro da Defesa do Brasil, José Múcio, achou de bom tom afirmar que as Forças Armadas Brasileiras vão "abrir o portão" caso os EUA tentem invadir o Brasil. Sim, o Brasil possui menos forças militares regulares do que os EUA, mas a doutrina de defesa brasileira nunca foi pensada para lutar uma guerra direta, mas sim adotar a Doutrina de Resistência e usar a profundidade estratégica do território nacional para tornar inviável a manutenção de uma invasão de uma potência inimiga que tenha forças superiores. Por isso, a fala do ministro José Múcio é completamente absurda e fora da realidade, manchando ainda mais a imagem das forças armadas brasileiras em um momento de tensões globais.

Napoleon Bonaparte hated small talk and was known to walk away mid conversation if he got bored.

So for reference. Algeria and Morocco hate eachother. And Algeria is a Spanish ally. So Basically now it's just standard to use mass movements of bio-trash as a geopolitical weapon.

🅲🅾🆇🆇 @queru_lant

3 days ago

Die Büchse der Pandora ist geöffnet. In Algerien treibt die Armee Abertausende schwarzafrikanische Migranten Richtung Marokko.

519 5K 14K 989K 2K

On the apps she’s not rejecting you. She’s rejecting your terrible pics. Fix it.

Praise The Camera Man @PraiseTheCMen

3 months ago

How to take a good profile picture with your phone 🤳

59 1K 17K 1.4M 26K

This is why I follow The War on Beauty, and why I recommend that you do too. She celebrates the people and ideas that bring beauty into the world while exposing those working to cheapen, erase, or destroy it. Beauty needs defenders. She is one of the best.

The War on Beauty @thewaronbeauty

3 days ago

What happened to billionaires benefiting society with their money?

189 415 6K 890K 2K

A hair transplant surgeon with 20 years of experience once admitted what he tells his friends privately that he would never say publicly because it would cut his revenue in half. He said 70% of the men who sit in his chair don't need a transplant. They need a $12 bottle of ketoconazole shampoo, a $15 derma roller, and rosemary oil. Used consistently for 6 months these three things would have reversed their hair loss before it reached the point where surgery felt like the only option. He said the hair loss industry survives on one thing: men waiting too long. A man notices his hairline receding at 22 and does nothing because he thinks he's too young for it to be real. At 25 he admits it's happening but Googles "is it really that bad" looking for permission to ignore it. At 28 the denial breaks and he panics. By then 5 years of miniaturization has occurred that could have been stopped at year one with $40/month in topicals. He said the consultation room is filled with a specific kind of grief. Not sadness. Regret. Men looking at old photos and saying "why didn't I start sooner." The answer is always the same. Because nobody told them that the first year of thinning is the easiest to reverse and the hardest year to take seriously. He said his most successful patients aren't the transplant patients. They're the 22 year olds who walked in early, got a simple protocol, and kept their hair for decades. They never came back for surgery because they never needed it. The hair loss industry makes money when you wait. Your hair survives when you don't.

Causes of severe autism have been put into complete remission by a simple antifungal like Sporanox. Look it up. Fungal overgrowth is a huge problem that’s going under the radar right now.

George Ferman @Helios_Movement

6 days ago

Yes. A Polish study for example found that children exposed to indoor mold for over two years had IQ scores approximately 10 points lower than their peers. Overall, we are all exposed to various kinds of mold. We are concerned with certain types that release mycotoxins such as:

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

9 52 513 109K 684

@utilitaryan False. Partus Sequitur Ventrum was the Roman law determining citizenship ship in Rome. It was then adopted into Judaism. You are only Jewish if your mother is Jewish. Mitochondria determine a babys personality. Secular Isareli women have 2.3TFR because of the Maternal Restriction

🚨NEW Study on the dangers of PUFA dropped: healthy people ate the same calories (40g fat) from butter, coconut oil, corn oil and flaxseed oil GlycA (systemic inflammation) was significantly elevated after consuming both PUFA sources compared to SFA sources

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Ragnar @pikeypilled

4 months ago

Seed oils (PUFA) are so metabolically deleterious that they are essential for hibernation The more PUFA animals eat- The LONGER they hibernate, the LOWER their metabolic rate, and the LOWER their body temperatures PUFA is uniquely fat promoting vs other oils

12 70 674 102K 243

boomers are smoking more weed, drinking more booze, having more one-night stands and getting more STDs than Gen-Z

This reminds me of this quote from Otto von Bismarck: "Gentlemen, if you contest the right of conquest, you cannot have read the history of your own country." Modern people are uncomfortable with the concept of Right of Conquest because it became essentially prohibited after 1945 to invoke it in any conflict, since the UN and the international order don't allow wars of conquests in terms of one country annexing territories of another country by force anymore. However even the creators of these modern post-1945 ideas never intended to question age old borders which were a result of some conquest centuries ago, when the Right of Conquest was effectively the norm, as Bismarck points out in this quote. Let me explain what the historical principle in international law and political practice known as Right of Conquest actually was. It did not mean recognizing that some country has the right to go on any war of conquest they want, but that a conquest could be seen as legitimate if the victorious party was able to establish effective control over the territory and the defeated were no longer able to resist or reclaim the territory. Historically, this would be seen as establishing a new legal reality, leading to formal treaties that confirmed the transfer. Such treaties were seen as valid and countries could claim legal right to territories by the virtue of having conquered them in the past. So even if these conquests resulted out of wars of aggression which would be seen as illegal, the result of the conquest could still be legally affirmed out of pragmatism and "might makes right" (Macht geht vor Recht) principle, a catchphrase specifically describing Otto von Bismarck's Realpolitik and a reality for most of history. In this context the Right of Conquest would be invoked. This was simply a pragmatic reality in the age where global empires and emerging nation states were regularly going at war with each other and territories switched hands all the time. In this context, the Right of Conquest was actually the only way to ensure peace, because if losing states would not want to accept defeat and transfer of their territories to the winner, peace treaties would be impossible to sign, and therefore leading to perpetual wars all over the world. However the Right of Conquest became essentially banned in 1945 by UN charters. Modern international relations and conflicts were to be guided by the concept of ex iniuria ius non oritur ("a right does not arise from a wrong"), which asserts that if a war was waged illegally, anything that was gained through such war could not be legally recognized as legitimate anymore. And since all wars of aggression are effectively seen as illegal today, countries could no longer invoke Right of Conquest in international law for any new transfers of land. The reason why a "ban" of such historically accepted concept like Right of Conquest was made possible is because of the establishment of international order that was actually able to enforce it. All the major post-1945 powers like USA and Soviet Union essentially agreed to it. For example when these countries waged wars and invaded other lands, they did not attempt to annex those lands and claim their territories but instead installed a favorable regime. The post-1945 order turned wars of conquest into regime change wars. The 1945 borders were practically meant to be frozen, to preserve world peace and provide stability, since such order at least in theory discourages countries to invade another, knowing that their territorial gains would never be legally recognized. So even though the modern 1945 international order banned the Right of Conquest to be invoked in future conflicts, it was never meant to question historic conquests that happened before that. Quite the opposite, because the 1945 borders were meant to be frozen. The modern international order is literally based on the idea that you affirm all the historic conquests that happened before it came into being as legitimate. But now you often see people who want to project the modern international legal order and morality into earlier times in history, and treat historic conquests as illegitimate, as if the post-1945 international laws existed in 15th century. This is just a result of complete ignorance of these people and/or their inability or dishonesty to form a coherent worldview. It's always completely selective too. For example if you think that Ceuta isn't Spanish because it was gained through some military conquest centuries ago, Morocco literally shouldn't exist as a country by the same logic. Or, to quote Bismarck again, "you cannot have read the history of your own country."

ɖʀʊӄքǟ ӄʊռʟɛʏ 🇧🇹🇹🇩 @kunley_drukpa

6 days ago

If centuries-old conquests are now fair game to challenge as ‘illegal occupations’ which other very long-standing territorial claims would you like to re-litigate?

55 82 1K 117K 133

People in relationships have higher BDNF - a key protein that stimulates the growth of new neurons. Love is neuroplasticity.

Enquanto a Espanha toma 50-60 mil ilegais em 24 horas e o mundo grita “invasão”, no Brasil a gente normalizou a conta. Mais de 580 mil venezuelanos residindo no país. Mais de 205 mil no Bolsa Família. Custo anual na casa de R$ 1,5 a 1,7 bilhão. Hospitais de Roraima historicamente estourados (percentuais relevantes de atendimento indo pra quem acabou de cruzar a fronteira). E a mídia trata como “acolhimento humanitário” enquanto o trabalhador brasileiro banca a conta da ditadura do lado. Fronteira sem controle não é solidariedade. É transferir o custo da bagunça dos outros pro seu bolso e pro seu SUS. Quem produz paga. Quem não controla a entrada é cúmplice.

Sequer UM PIO sobre isto no Brasil.

The White House @WhiteHouse

a week ago

The truth. COVID.GOV 👀

7K 28K 138K 105.4M 51K

“Minoxidil is destroying my hairline” Minoxidil causes hair shedding in the first few weeks so that those who respond(~50%) can regrow hair, while the 50% non-responders end up losing hair they likely won’t get back. 3 months “progress” Before After

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Oxidative State @oxidativestate

3 weeks ago

Adenosine found to be as effective as minoxidil in a clinical trial, although the patient were “significantly more satisfied with adenosine because of faster prevention of hair loss and appearance of the newly grown hairs” Adenosine’s benefits: -Stimulates hair growth factors

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

5 18 264 86K 367