Loosefish @LooseFish93

Burnham: trounced twice by Labour Party membership. Solution! Remove most of the members. Remove the twice landslide winner Corbyn. Change the leadership election rules. Install a totally subservient PLP. Burnham is leader! A triumph for Democratic Socialist principles 😆

MikeD @mjdaly57

a day ago

@Matthew_Patrick Sermonising garbage. If Burnham really is the ‘ambassador for the progressive values’ you hold dear then he would have won the 2015 leadership contest. After appearing at hustings all over the country, members and supporters cottoned on that he didn’t represent these values at

7 51 96 3K 2

Whoever came up with this deserves a standing ovation. 😂😂😂 “Stop the bungs” with Count Binface standing on the beach while Nigel Farage rows away in a boat full of cash… satire doesn’t get much better than this.

The whole country knows what Jeremy Corbyn's front door looks like. The media used to camp outside it every day. Nigel Farage hasn't received even 5% of the treatment Jeremy Corbyn faced.

Corbyn was branded a conspiracy theorist for warning a US trade deal would push up NHS drug costs and put patients at risk. The latest BMJ's study claims the deal Starmer signed will divert £45bn from the NHS and cause 229,000 excess deaths by 2036. Corbyn was right.

When politicians and media say ‘difficult choices’, that’s code for working class people about to be screwed.

The "good and decent man" narrative is one of the weirdest elements of modern English politics. There's no evidence for Keir Starmer being decent, and in fact, an abundance of testimony and evidence of actions that would indicate that he's a complete bastard. It's bollocks.

Correction: Starmer is a bad man. A treacherous man. Starmer will be remembered for breaking every pledge he made— on taxes, welfare, farmers, immigration, and the NHS. For cutting winter fuel payments for our pensioners. For the Mandelson/Epstein disaster. For two-tier policing and jailing nationals for words a d social media posts while paedophiles walk free. For spending £7–9 billion of our taxes on Ukraine and licensing £150–400+ million in weapons so 'israel' can mass murder Palestinians and other non-jews in West Asia. For prosecuting protesters as 'terrorists'. For pushing digital ID and state policing. For putting 'israel' first— not Britain, not the British people, not British interests. We should get rid of every British politician who still calls this criminal a 'good man'. He deserves the Hague. May he never know peace.

Sam Rushworth MP @SamJRushworth

3 weeks ago

Keir Starmer is a good man. A family man. He transformed the Labour Party and took us back to power. People don't see it yet, but history will judge him well. Whoever we choose to lead next will have my loyal support, like Keir has had, as we go on serving the country we love.

385 53 328 251K 10

Starmer calling Corbyn's Labour morally bankrupt in his resignation speech — from a man who defended collective punishment in Gaza, fed intelligence to Israeli génocidaires, and had activists trying to stop it arrested as terrorists. Not a decent man. An indecent sociopath.

In 6 months - 2,800 arrests were made in the UK for supporting Palestinian Action. None were made for over 2,000 British-Israeli dual nationals who have served in an IDF that's slaughtering thousands of innocent children in Palestine & Lebanon. Please RT until this is reversed.

I think this sums up the perfectly the direction of travel our country is heading 😭 or should I say we've already arrived . 😭 #authoritarianregime @BBCNews @SkyNews @itvnews @Channel4News any MSM reporting on the threats to our democracy? That would be a No then?

The Govt is obsessed with people being in work so they get forced into a job, come off benefits but do not earn a living wage becuase their employer refuses to pay one, so have to - claim benefits. The 'benefits bill' will in no way go down, in fact it will probably go up.

All of those things are illegal. All of those things have laws which make them illegal. All of those things were put before a jury - in some cases twice. The jury convicted on all of those things. The sentencing judge, after the jury had convicted under the relevant laws, decided he was going to chuck in "terrorism" for good measure, just cos. Are you really so stupid as to not see how wrong it is to do that? Or should people be sentenced according to what judges have decided they have done rather than what they have been charged and convicted for?

Keir Starmer's Labour Party love banging on about 'change' don't they? Well, now they are trying to change their stories as the tidal wave of truth wipes them out. The Labour Party's quislings (and there are a lot of them) are trying to revise their complicity in Israel's genocide against Palestinians. To each and every one of you, we will never forget what you did, we will remind you of what you did til your dying days, and beyond that, your families will be reminded as well.

Emily Thornberry has today said the government has let down the Palestinian people, and allowed Israel to act with impunity. The audacity. Here she is in October 2023 refusing to condemn Israel cutting off power and supplies to Gaza. Don’t let these people rewrite history.

Tony Blair could have lived a quiet life as a retired war criminal but instead he feels compelled to pop up from time to time to remind everyone how evil he is, just to feel like he’s still relevant.

The establishment refuses to learn anything. Nearly 20 years after the financial crash of 2008, the generation that grew up in its shadow is now being punished by the system that promised them success if they simply followed the rulebook. Meanwhile, the architects of this crisis, like Mandelson, are rewarded with money, power and status. There is something very wrong with this county. theguardian.com/politics/2026/…

Tony Blair is the living embodiment of what happens when political office becomes a down payment on future plunder. Ejected in 2007 by his own MPs as a massive liability, he bequeathed Britain a wild casino economy primed for the 2008 crash. And when the British economy crashed and burned, Mr Blair kept quiet while honing his skills at securing power by other means. His first job, after his ejection from 10 Downing Street, was as the West’s Middle East envoy, with a supposed emphasis on Gaza. It took six painful years for Mr Blair’s tenure to prove a failure so profound it amounted to active complicity in Israel’s ethnic cleansing, in Palestinian erasure, and in paving the ground for the ongoing genocide. Soon after, the Chilcot Inquiry demolished Blair’s Iraq lies, exposing him as a liar, a chancer and a war criminal responsible for countless corpses of Iraqis, but also of British soldiers. Then came Blair’s real innovation: the financialisation of the ex-premiership itself. The Tony Blair Institute, fuelled by £130 million from Oracle's Larry Ellison—coincidentally, the largest individual donor to the Friends of the IDF—became a shadow state, brokering governance contracts for autocrats and companies like Palantir that weaponise AI to produce mega-death abroad and full-on surveillance of Western populations. Now, in May 2026, this corporate fixer issues a 5700 word tantrum demanding that Labour embrace Trump even more than Starmer already has, denounce what is left of Labour’s betrayed Green New Deal, and trash the remnants of workers' rights. This is not the wisdom of an aging statesman. It is the frantic squirming of a man fearing his grip on oligarchic power might soon wane and whose entire post-10 Downing Street existence depends on preventing the many from ever reclaiming what the few have plundered. theguardian.com/politics/2026/…

Absolutely. To paraphrase Frankie Boyle: Blair is perfectly entitled to his opinion. I just happen to think he should be giving it from the Dock in The Hague.

Saul Staniforth @SaulStaniforth

2 months ago

.@faizashaheen: "Firstly on Blair, he should be held accountable for what he did with the Iraq War, when he lied to all of us, I just find it shameful that he can come out & expect to give us advice on anything" Spot on.

55 2K 5K 90K 136

What the information below shows is that Josh Simons lied to the public repeatedly when trying pathetically to defend himself from his appalling activities on behalf of Keir Starmer. If @AndyBurnhamGM utilises Simons in any role whatsoever it will be a clear signal that Burnham is no different to Starmer: mendacious, dishonest & bent. We can but hope!

Paul Holden @pauleholden

2 months ago

Final upload of the evening, but many more to come. This is the 'case summary' and 'intelligence and investigations offer' submitted to @joshsimonsmp by APCO worldwide in November 2023. It plainly indicates that I am a journalist and will be investigated (bit catty on the

10 275 412 23K 40

Joint Statement: Paul Holden and Andrew Feinstein Regarding Labour Together, APCO and the Labour Party On Wednesday last week we received documents from Labour Together following Subject Access Requests that we submitted to Labour Together in February 2026. The documents provided by Labour Together are deeply disturbing. They show that Labour Together and APCO targeted us, our colleagues, our associates and Paul’s family with utterly false and highly defamatory allegations, and that this was done with the knowledge of the highest levels of the Labour Party. Indeed, we are now of the view that the operation to investigate us, our families and associates was effectively a joint operation run by the Labour Party, Labour Together and APCO. This highly invasive campaign was launched because of Paul’s factually accurate reporting. This reporting raised serious questions about whether Labour Together and Morgan McSweeney deliberately failed to report £730,000 in donations to the Electoral Commission in violation of the law. It is now plain that Sir Keir Starmer benefited from the work funded by these donations and that they facilitated his rise to power. We are calling for a full inquiry into Labour Together. We also call on Sir Keir Starmer to clarify his role in this scandal. Considering the documents that have been disclosed to date, we find it nearly inconceivable that Sir Keir Starmer did not know about this despicable project that included Labour Together reporting us to the National Cyber Security Center (NCSC), a part of GCHQ, based on utterly false and highly defamatory allegations. These highly defamatory allegations were then shared with at least one major newspaper outlet. The newly released documents reveal six important facts. First, they show that Morgan McSweeney and Paul Ovenden were aware of the APCO and Labour Together investigation into us from at least January 2024. McSweeney was the Labour Party’s head of campaigns and subsequently Sir Keir Starmer’s Chief of Staff in Number 10. Paul Ovenden was the Director of Labour Party communications and subsequently Head of Strategy in Number 10. The emails show Simons arranging a meeting between himself, Ovenden, McSweeney and Tom Harper, a senior APCO employee, to discuss the investigation into us. A third Labour employee was copied into the email, but, because of redactions, we do not know who this is. We ask the Labour Party to confirm who else was copied into this correspondence. The excellent @PeterKGeoghegan and Democracy for Sale have confirmed with a Labour Party source that the intended meeting did take place. Second, they show that APCO’s Tom Harper actively coached Josh Simons and Labour Together on how to submit a ‘crime complaint’ about us to the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), a part of GCHQ. Harper provided text for Simons to submit to the NCSC. The decision to complain about us to the NCSC was made only days after Simons had emailed McSweeney, Ovenden and Harper about APCO’s upcoming report into us, asking for a meeting to discuss its contents. Third, Josh Simons has repeatedly claimed in public that he appointed APCO to investigate a ‘hack’ of Labour Together materials. But the new documents show that Labour Together and Simons did not conduct any meaningful cybersecurity review to establish whether materials had been hacked from Labour Together, or where else they may have been sourced from. Labour Together did, however, appoint a cybersecurity expert to review a potential hack in late 2025. This review, a summary of which has now been disclosed to us, shows that there was no ‘hack’ of Labour Together. This is obviously true, as we have repeatedly explained that the investigation into Labour Together was based on documents legally leaked from the Labour Party by whistleblowers concerned about misconduct by the Party’s most senior officials, open-source materials, and Freedom of Information requests. Fourth, they show that Josh Simons and Labour Together told the NCSC that they were reporting us because they were concerned that Paul’s reporting ‘may be a co-ordinated effort to discredit Labour Together in order to undermine Mr McSweeney and by extension, Mr. Starmer in the run-up to next year’s general election.’ It is our view that this joint Labour Together, Labour Party and APCO operation was launched because Paul’s factually accurate reporting would have shed light on the highly problematic and unlawful aspects of Sir Keir Starmer’s rise to power. Fifth, they show that APCO had sent a ‘case summary’ to Josh Simons of Labour Together on the 20th of November 2020, on the basis of which APCO were contracted by Labour Together two days later. The ‘case summary’, setting out a proposed scope of work, clearly identified us as journalists. From the very beginning, therefore, APCO and Labour Together knew that they were looking to investigate journalists – the very journalists who were reporting accurately on Labour Together, Morgan McSweeney and undeclared donations. Sixth, they show that Simons wrote to an unknown person at the Labour Party in November 2023 asking for ‘intel’ on us. This shows that Simons’ immediate response to announcement of Paul’s book was to seek the assistance of the Labour Party. At the time, we were both Labour Party members. The reply to Simons’ request has been redacted in our documents. We call on the Labour Party to release all documents to us relevant to this scandal, and to confirm whether Josh Simons, Labour Together or APCO were provided with any of our private, personal information.