T 🌋 🌪 🦇 🔊 @tree_chain

The former head of the UK's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, told Boris Johnson in early 2020 that the Covid virus escaped from the Wuhan lab. That means that the US, UK, Chinese, & German governments all knew the truth, covered it up, and spread disinformation. Case closed.

Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger

3 years ago

After years of official claims to the contrary, strong new evidence suggests the virus known as SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a Chinese lab. According to multiple sources, the researchers who led gain-of-function research, which increases infectiousness, were the first to be infected.

1K 8K 29K 11.4M 3K

Let me get this straight. Fauci’s NIAID and @USAID sent over $40M in U.S. taxpayer “support” to a scientist in Wuhan who was working on “bat coronavirus emergence” research, who also became “patient zero” for COVID-19? And the completion date for that funding was … in 2019??? This document was obtained via FOIA by @WhiteCoatWaste. Give them a follow. @elonmusk

NEW. HISTORIC MOMENT IN AUSTRALIA. The action that results from this could end up sweeping the World A new motion brought by the Port Hedland Council, in Western Australia, gets a 5-2 majority vote to "Call for an immediate suspension of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 products". Here's some IMPORTANT POINTS of the motion that was passed by majority: ◻️All 537 Local Councils Australia Wide will be notified that they have called for the immediate suspension of covid mRNA vaccine, providing also the evidence and research around DNA contamination ◻️ "That Council forthwith deliver the letter seen at Annexure 1 to the Prime Minister" ◻️ "That Council forthwith circulates to all registered health practitioners and medical clinics operating within the Port Hedland Local Government Area" ◻️Councils will “Circulate to all other Australian Local Government Councils and shires [informing] all Councils and Shires about the findings” ◻️“Council strongly urges to practitioners to share this information with patients contemplating receiving any Pfizer or Moderna Cvoid mRNA vaccines” ◻️The CEO and their delegates contact the Commonwealth Minister for Health and Aged Care, Mark Butler, presenting Dr. Speicher’s Special Council Meeting Agenda” ◻️“The Council request a formal and public response from Minister Butler", the Australian Federal Health Minister These councillors discuss "the seriousness of the matter" around DNA contamination of both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines [which showed] levels 145x higher then levels deemed safe by the TGA. The councillors say there is "Clear scientific evidence that millions of Australians" could be, or have been, exposed to these risks: (4:34) Second Councillor Speaks. Votes FOR. Mentions that the silence from the Government and Health Officials is "QUITE ALARMING" (13:33) This is a Historic Motion (14:49) Nurse with 47 years experience. Votes FOR (16:21) Fourth Councillor votes FOR (16:57) Deputy Mayor. Votes FOR (21:15) Closing Remarks by Cr. Adrian McRae and final Vote. Adrian mentions BRIEF OVERVIEW FROM TRANSCRIPT: "Evidence [shows] levels of synthetic DNA contamination [is] up to 145 times higher [than] the TGA's own safety limits. For those unfamiliar the TGA limits are there for a reason, because synthetic DNA has been shown to integrate into human cells, leading to potential longterm health risks, like cancer genomic instability, vascular thromboses and blood clotting.....as well as immune system disruptions. These findings are alarming, but they are also far from isolated. Independent studies now in Canada, Germany and the US have all confirmed similar levels of contamination. International experts including some of the world's leading oncologists, geneticists, virologists, immunologists, microbiologists, and biochemists have joined forces to warn governments around the world, including our own government, about the dangers these contaminants pose. This is why the honorable Russell Broadbent MP, the Federal Member for Monash, has written multiple letters to the Prime Minister urging an immediate investigation and suspension of these vaccines. Yet the response from our government has been nothing but silence, not a word from the Prime Minister, not a word from the minister of health, despite receiving clear scientific evidence that millions of Australians could be at risk including those folks right here in Port Headland who were forced to take these experimental shots" "Sure health is not in the remit of of local government, but looking after our people most certainly is.....Tonight it was certainly not doing anything other than asking questions.....I would like to think that most of the people here are are not scared to ask questions of our bosses or of our state governments, or federal governments....we're all people no matter, you know, we're all just making our way through and I just think [that] this motion tonight [could] be the ripple that um creates a bigger wave across the country, and perhaps across the world. So there are a lot of people watching this, I know all over the world, pretty much every continent is covered and it's been a honour to talk with you guys about it, and it's an honour to represent you guys on such an issue.... [but] I just hope that everyone votes the right way and [I think] most people here know what the right way is so thank you" This really could be the beginning of a grass roots movement within the smaller government councils, notifying smaller communities Australia wide, pushing the Federal and State governments to take real action

WOW: A study involving 1.7 million children has found that myocarditis and pericarditis only appeared in children who had received Covid mRNA vaccines. Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from these heart-related problems. This is absolutely shocking.

Questioning the safety of mRNA vaccine biotech? Just watch this: @PierreKory @thecoastguy @P_McCulloughMD @JesslovesMJK

🚨 BREAKING: A study released today of excess mortality in 125 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic found the major causes of death globally stemmed from public health establishment’s response, including mandates and lockdowns that caused severe stress, harmful medical interventions and the COVID-19 vaccines. They said the theory that the virus caused the deaths is propped up by mass virus-testing campaigns that should be abandoned. Instead, they found that in many places, there was no excess mortality until the vaccines were rolled out, and most countries showed temporal associations between vaccine rollouts and increases in all-cause mortality. Based on their analysis and interpretations, they concluded, “We are compelled to state that the public health establishment and its agents fundamentally caused all the excess mortality in the Covid period.” childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/exces…

CDC Director at the time C-19 vaccines were rolled out just admitted what would likely be criminal if not done by our gov't: "there was inappropriate decisions by some to try to underreport any side effects because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated."

MORE LEAKED AUDIO: Australians in Shock Over Former President of Australian Medical Association Prof. Kerryn Phelps' Leaked Audio on Vaccine Injuries "I've never seen so many young people having cardiac MRIs in my entire career. There are people who've had heart damage, myocarditis, they've had heart problems" This is perfectly consistent with my clinical practice. A war zone of cardiac vaccine injuries--so many in young men. @_aussie17 aussie17.com/p/more-leaked-…

Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the world’s leading vaccinologist, and his disciples, have just capitulated. After decades of claiming vaccine safety is robustly studied, they just admitted it is not, neither before nor after licensure. But don’t be fooled – read my stack or this long tweet for details! Plotkin Article: nejm.org/doi/full/10.10… It is amazing that after decades of Dr. Stanley Plotkin and his vaccinologist disciples insisting vaccines are the most well studied products on the planet, they just penned an article admitting precisely the opposite. They just admitted vaccines are not properly studied—neither pre-licensure nor post-licensure. They admitted, for example, “prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes [and] follow-up durations” and that “there are not resources earmarked for postauthorization safety studies.” That is an incredible reversal. But let me provide context so nobody is fooled at what they are clearly up to: For decades, the medical community insisted vaccines are the most thoroughly studied product ever; for example, Dr. Paul Offit said, "I think we should be proud of vaccines as arguably the safest, best tested things we put in our body.” For decades, parents of vaccine injured children, vaccine injured adults, and other stakeholders contested these claims only to be shunned and attacked by the medical community and health agencies. In 2018, I had the unprecedented opportunity to depose the architect of our vaccination program and the Godfather of Vaccinology, Dr. Plotkin, and lay bare the evidence that showed what these authors are now finally admitting about the utter lack of vaccine safety trials and studies. See thehighwire.com/ark-videos/the…. After this deposition is made public, Dr. Plotkin goes on a tirade, making demands that FDA add “missing information on safety and efficacy” in vaccine package inserts and that CDC exclude harms from its Vaccine Information Sheets, “lobbying the Gates Foundation to support pro-vaccine organizations,” working to have WHO list vaccine hesitancy as a global threat, lobbying AAP, IDSA and PIDS to “support training of witnesses” to support vaccine safety, etc. See icandecide.org/article/dr-sta…. The problem is, it doesn't work. It doesn’t work because, at bottom, there are no proper safety studies. So, there is no safety data to add to the FDA package inserts, and hiding harms by removing them from CDC inserts doesn’t make them go away. Parents and other adults don’t simply stop believing what they have seen with their own eyes because CDC, WHO, the Gates Foundations, etc., won’t acknowledge them, or worse, they attack them. That brings us to the present in which Plotkin and his disciples realize they can’t cast voodoo on the public. They can’t hide the truth. So, their only option is to try and co-op the truth they have lied about for decades by now admitting that the studies to show vaccines are safe do not exist. But in making that admission, they conveniently fail to admit that for decades they lied, gaslit, defrauded (and I don’t use that word lightly) the public by claiming that vaccines are probably the most thoroughly safety tested products on the planet and that people should rest assured, no stone on vaccine safety was left unturned. Thus, in their article just published, they pretend they never lied about vaccine safety. They pretend they are now just pointing out vaccine safety has never really been conducted, as if that was not known to them before. Don’t be fooled. Their real agenda is plain, and it is not to study vaccine safety, but rather to confirm that which they already believe. This is crystal clear from the fact that, while their article admits the studies have not been done, they write in the same breath that serious vaccine harms are “rare.” But if the studies have not been done, how do they know that? The answer is, they don’t, and they don’t care to know the truth. Their goal is to protect the products they have spent their careers defending and worshipping and that have brought them fame and riches. They also ignore the mountain of studies and data which already exist that clearly show serious vaccine harms. Just take a moment to review the large body of science around one of the adjuvants used in vaccines which multiple studies show can cause serious harm. See pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38788092/. Finally, just look at their proposed solution. After making the a priori conclusion that harms are “rare,” ignoring all the existing studies showing harm, these folk have the audacity to want to raid the federal vaccine injury compensation fund to presumably pay themselves and their compatriots hundreds of millions of dollars to conduct the studies that would, no doubt, seek to confirm their prior conclusion that vaccine harms are “rare,” while ignoring the studies that already show serious harm. So, with that in mind, and sorry for the long wind-up, here are the things they admit in this article for maybe the very first time: “[T]he widespread vaccine hesitancy observed during the Covid-19 pandemic suggests that the public is no longer satisfied with the traditional safety goal of simply detecting and quantifying the associated risks after a vaccine has been authorized for use.” Comment: The parents of vaccine injured children, vaccine injured adults, and others were never “satisfied” with seeking to assess “risks after a vaccine has been authorized.” “Postauthorization studies are needed to fully characterize the safety profile of a new vaccine, since prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes, follow up durations, and population heterogeneity.” Comment: Let me translate: the clinical trials relied upon to license childhood vaccines are useless with regard to safety since they virtually never have a placebo control, typically review safety for days or weeks after injection, and often have far too few participants to measure anything of value, just see icandecide.org/no-placebo; amazingly, I just had a dispute with a Plotkin disciple not long ago in which they were clearly still not ready to admit the above truth x.com/AaronSiriSG/st…. “It is critical to examine adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) that have not been detected in clinical trials, to ascertain whether they are causally or coincidentally related to vaccination.” Comment: No shit and you have been claiming for decades this was being done! “When they are caused by vaccines (vaccine adverse reactions), the risk attributable to vaccination and the biologic mechanism must be ascertained. That science becomes the basis for developing safer vaccines, if possible, and for determining contraindications to vaccination and the compensation that should be offered for AEFIs.” Comment: Again, no shit, and you have also been claiming for decades this was being done! “Currently in the United States, when the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends a new routine vaccine, the only automatic statutory resource allocations that follow are for vaccine procurement by Vaccines for Children (VFC) and for the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). Although the ACIP acknowledges the need, there are currently no resources earmarked for postauthorization safety studies beyond annual appropriations, which must be approved by Congress each year.” Comment: Again, no shit! But nice of you to finally admit it after decades of gaslighting. “Progress in vaccine-safety science has understandably been slow — often depending on epidemiologic evidence that is delayed or is inadequate to support causal conclusions and on an understanding of biologic mechanisms that is incomplete — which has adversely affected vaccine acceptance.” Comment: More gaslighting because had a proper clinical trial been conducted pre-licensure, we would know the safety before it is unleashed on babies and we wouldn’t need to rely on confounded-biased-conflicted-post-authorization “epidemiological” studies you now want to conduct which you make clear you only suggest because you want to avoid “public concern and consequent decreases in immunization coverage,” not because you actually care about safety. “In 234 reviews of various vaccines and health outcomes conducted from 1991 to 2012, the IOM found inadequate evidence to prove or disprove causation in 179 (76%) of the relationships it explored, illustrating the need for more rigorous science.” Comment: Again, no shit, and I would appreciate if you would please properly cite to the ICAN white paper from 2017 from which you have plainly lifted this point icandecide.org/wp-content/upl…. “Identifying the biologic mechanisms of adverse reactions — how and in whom they occur — is critical for developing safer vaccines, preventing adverse reactions by expanding contraindications, and equitably compensating vaccinees for true adverse reactions.” Comment: Shameless to pretend you have not for decades ignored or attacked those calling for these studies while pretending a mountain of such studies showing the foregoing don’t already exist. “[T]he budget for vaccine-safety monitoring at the CDC (which is responsible for the majority of U.S. federal efforts) has remained stagnant … at about $20 million per year” which they write is an “inadequate level of funding.” Comment: Again, shameless to pretend parent groups have not been yelling about this issue for decades only to be ignored and attacked. “The public [now] also wants public health authorities to mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse events – which no longer seem rare when vaccines are given to millions or billions of people.” Comment: They have always been given to millions or billions of people, and the studies showing the harms they cause are not rare and they already exist, but you don’t really care about that reality as vaccine safety is not really the goal. If they are really interested in the truth about what injuries vaccines cause and the rate at which these injuries occur, then they should welcome convening a bipartisan panel which could first review all the very concerning studies and hard data that already exists on this topic (often by scientists not on pharma’s dole) and we could design additional studies together and have them run in the open so everybody has to live with the result. (Among other reasons to demand the study be conducted in the open is that I have witnessed firsthand what happens when a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children in large multi-million person datasets, using historical insurance data, showed vaccinated children had multiple times the rate of numerous chronic diseases – the study gets buried hence the need to do it in the open.) Plotkin and company should welcome studies which can show vaccines have not contributed to the rise in chronic childhood disease (many of which are immune mediated diseases) from 12% of children in the early 1980s (when CDC recommended 7 routine childhood injections) to over 50% of children now (when CDC recommends over 90 routine childhood injections). And I think they do welcome such studies if they can assure that the outcome would show vaccines do not cause these harms. Alas, the reality is that (as they know) studies showing vaccines contribute to this rise already exist. But their goal, in any event, is not to really study safety. Rather it is to prove their prior assumption that vaccines are safe and harms are “rare.” This approach is how they designed VAERS, V-SAFE, VSD, and every other “safety” system. As is transparent from their article, the only reason they even pretend to care about vaccine safety is that they want to avoid reduction in vaccine uptake – not actually assure safety. That all said, if they are really well-meaning, I would welcome collaborating. To be fair, I will email all four of them to request a meeting to review existing science and design studies mutually agreed upon. If they are really interested in vaccine safety, they should welcome that (I have no hard feelings despite their attacks on me and I hope they can rise above any hard feelings they have for the sake of protecting children). Most importantly, I'm willing to live with the results of those studies. Are they?

Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG

3 years ago

Dr. Offit, your revised definition of "placebo" as "immunologically inert" would focus on testing efficacy, not safety, which is precisely the substantive concern raised by @RobertKennedyJr and others when explaining that childhood vaccines are virtually never licensed based on

344 2K 7K 1.6M 907

BREAKING - New study finds all-cause death risks to be higher for those vaccinated with one and two COVID-19 vaccine doses compared to the unvaccinated and that the booster doses were ineffective. They also found a slight but statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with 2 or 3/4 doses. The subjects vaccinated with 2 doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during the follow-up considered. mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/7… Read analysis on Courageous Discourse: shorturl.at/de4jc #MFScholar

🚨🚨🚨 Just in: On Australia's Mainstream Media 7News Former Australia Medical Association President Professor Kerryn Phelps and her partner Jackie talks about vaccine side effects Highlights Professor Kerryn Phelps: A week after I had the vaccine. Having never had any problems with my heart or my blood pressure ever, my blood pressure went extremely high, my pulse rate went extremely high. I woke in the night with my heart pounding, being able to hear my pulse in my ears, something called pulsatile tinnitus. I lost some hearing in my left ear. I went through a period of time where just walking across a room, my pulse rate would go up enormously. And that affected me terribly. And I became very breathless. I had a whole lot of investigations and nobody could really tell me what it was until I had testing for dysautonomia which is a problem of the nervous system and the way it interacts with the heart and the vascular system. And that is one of the recognition side effects of Pfizer. Jackie: I'm not an anti vaxxer. I've had anaphylaxis to foods before and I was really worried about an anaphylaxis. So we went along to the hospital where they had medical help, if I had anaphylaxis and they gave me the needle, within five minutes, my head nearly blew off my body. My face went bright red, my vision was impaired, I couldn't hear, my feet went numb, my hands went numb. I had paresthesia all over my body. And from that minute, my hair started falling out. I could hardly walk. For the next three years, it's three years on the 15 May this year since I had that Pfizer shot. It has ruined my life. It has made me hide away from people because my specialists have said if I catch COVID that'll be the end of me. So I can't have any more vaccines and I wouldn't go near them with a ten foot barge pole. It is neurological, rheumatological, it's caused ongoing problems for me. Professor Kerryn Phelps: There is so much to learn. There's an incredible lack of medical curiosity about investigating this. The TGA, take the reports. Apparently there have been 144,000 adverse reaction reports. But that's a drop in the ocean compared to the number of actual adverse reactions that there are, because a lot of them aren't being reported, because certainly in the early days, they weren't being recognised. So there is so much that needs to happen to engage with people who have suffered vaccine injuries and for us.

RFK jr stuns Dr Phil with the level of kickbacks Fauci and the NIH get on the Moderna vaccine. Not only does the NIH own half of that vaccine, several high level officials under Fauci collect $150000 a year forever as long as that MRNA technology is on the market. A topic banned from discussion on MSM!

GP Dr David White gives an excellent lesson on the findings from the Pfizer/BioNTech trial. Every doctor should hear this. Every politician should hear this. Every patient should hear this.

IT NEVER WAS A VACCINE - IT ALWAYS WAS A GENE THERAPY... Covid mRNA injections: Ever since news that a "covid vaccine" was on its way, honest physicians and scientists have argued that the mRNA products are NOT vaccines, but rather, GENE THERAPY Many of us were doled out repeated social media bans and even de-platforming for uttering the words Not only does the term "gene therapy" dissuade the masses from rolling up for just another vaccine... It significantly alters the regulatory requirements for manufacturers. If the mRNA products are labelled a vaccine, they are automatically conferred immunity from liability should they turn out to be maiming and killing people (!!); under the USA Prep Act A recent paper in the Nature Journal should make it clear once and for all that the injection your government assured you was "just another vaccine", was indeed a NOVEL GENE THERAPY Having their mRNA products classified as a Vaccine, not Gene Therapy, handed a "get out of jail free" card to manufacturers who were subsequently EXEMPTED from performing the plethora of safety and toxicity tests required for Gene Therapy The injection that you were repeatedly told was "safe and effective", actually had been exempted from the following safety and toxicity testing required for Gene Therapy Genotoxicity (does it damage DNA) Genome integration (can it be integrated permanently into your DNA) Germ-line transmission (can it integrate into your egg or sperm and be passed to your offspring as a permanent mutation) Insertional mutagenesis (can it cause permanent mutations in your DNA) Tumorigenicity (can it cause tumours and cancers) Embryo/fetal and perinatal toxicity (is it toxic to your fetus and newborn) Long-term expression (does the mrna code go on expressing indefinitely) Repeated toxicity (does it become more toxic with subsequent doses) Excretion in the environment, such as shedding through seminal fluid or breast milk. You may have been mislead to believe that all of the testing above was completed before you were assured that your injection was "safe and effective" It wasn't done It wasn't a vaccine It was and is a GENE THERAPY (links in comments)

A powerful commentary by actor Tim Robbins on the horrendous demonisation of those who questioned the response to Covid.

🚨 Happening now in Australia. Senate hearing on Excess Deaths: Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan (@DrJKunadhasan) shares how Pfizer manipulated trial results by hiding deaths in the vaccinated arm. "At the pivotal point of Pfizer's vaccine approval in December 2020, there was a gross misrepresentation in what was presented publicly. Instead of the six deaths publicly disclosed, four placebo, two vaccinated, suggesting a benefit of vaccination. There were in fact eleven deaths with more deaths in the vaccinated arm. Six we found undisclosed deaths, especially in the vaccinated arm of this clinical trial, in contravention to legal and ethical obligations of trial sponsors."

🧬Professor Dalgleish - "I've really lost my faith in the journals". His research was accepted by a Biophysics journal, which understood exactly the point he was making, about how the actual "CHARGE was affected [which] would NEVER EVER occur in normal evolution" ◻️ "I was first to pick up it had escaped from a lab" ◻️ "It had 6 x insertions round it, we thought THEY NEED TO KNOW THIS" ◻️ "We submitted it and it went to cabinet [and] they chose to ignore it" ◻️ "It altered the charge and the whole infectivity" Professor Dalgleish said he sent all this scientific research to the top journals, because it was important to know for future modelling of vaccines. He sent it to: ◻️ Nature ◻️ Science ◻️ Virology ◻️ Lancet "And we got the same reply back [saying] we've nothing against the science, but it is not in the public interest to publish your paper". Nikolai Petrovski went through the same thing when he was trying to publish research about the virus being perfectly adapted to Human ACE2 receptors, from DAY 1. Isn't it interesting how the powers controlling all the scientific publishing of research were actively suppressing important research?

BREAKING - New study finds "the ready-to-use mRNA vaccine Comirnaty (@pfizer) contains DNA impurities that exceed the permitted limit value by several hundred times and, in some cases, even more than 500 times... the applied qPCR (by governments) is designed so that a massive under-detection of DNA impurities appears to be the result." This study corroborates findings by @Kevin_McKernan et al (osf.io/preprints/osf/…) and @DJSpeicher et al (osf.io/preprints/osf/…). @FLSurgeonGen Joseph Ladapo's call to halt COVID-19 vaccines is scientifically justified. @CDCgov @US_FDA #MFScholar Full study: mdpi.com/2409-9279/7/3/… @P_McCulloughMD @JesslovesMJK @denisrancourt @stkirsch @DrAseemMalhotra @MakisMD @joeyvantes @JohnBoweActor @brownstoneinst @ChildrensHD @EpochTimes @zerohedge @VigilantNews @VigilantFox @RealAmVoice @OANN @TheChiefNerd @DrNoMask @drcraigwax @MdBreathe @TuckerCarlson @TCNetwork @joerogan @elonmusk @RandPaul @RealAlexJones @infowars @OwenShroyer1776 @RealCandaceO @WhiteHouse @NIH @COVIDSelect