Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

Blenheimheath upon Durdlebury Joined May 2011

Tweets

3K
Followers

93
Following

44
Likes

5K

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a week ago

What you reckon to this: search.brave.com/search?q=site%… (Google the only search engine to block it so far that I can see) @UK_Daniel_Card

0 0 0 22 0

View Details

@Glassdoor have you actually tested your workflow to login on mobile to Glassdoor? If you have the indeed app, the token doesn't transfer back to Glassdoor. You login to indeed..and that's it.. Please hire some people who know what they are doing..

0 0 0 15 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

7 months ago

@princessakano AI slop

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

A £30 TrainPal's Gift is waiting for you—click to help, and we’ll share the prize!t.trip.com/awNPcoc

0 0 1 14 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@MiddleearthMixr Guy managed to get the entirety of the British Military in one photo.

0 0 0 47 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@RupertLowe10 You are the man of the hour, every hour.

0 0 0 15 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@lumbago223 @CraigJo98153674 @aswren Simply put, it's a private transaction between two individuals. You're a communist.

1 0 0 21 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@sunny051488 @CBRobber @thomasforth @HiddenYorkshire Agree with that. But offering a paid service has absolutely no relevance to what you're saying. If the cars were free it would be completely different.

0 0 0 15 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@lumbago223 @CraigJo98153674 @aswren It's a private transaction between a private person and a private company. No government money is spent. The cost is ZERO. You have an an issue with PIP, not the scheme. The two are connected only because the government imposes a price cap. That's it.

1 0 0 22 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@CBRobber @thomasforth @HiddenYorkshire Abused? It's two private citizens making a transaction. If you don't like the cars they get, ask the gov to lower the mobility element of pip. here's no cost to the tax payer or ukgov. You're clearly arguing in bad faith and I have no time for it.

1 0 0 15 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@CBRobber @thomasforth @HiddenYorkshire Then you have a problem with PIP mobility amount and not motability the scheme. How are you not getting this lmao.

0 0 0 26 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@stod76496 @thomasforth @HiddenYorkshire Yes, let's bring back communism. The free market solution to pip claimants travelling that costs us zero is to make the producer of this car infinite money and have them inaccessible to 90% of claimants. Then pay £1,000 per week per claimant for their travel like we do with kids.

0 0 0 111 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@lumbago223 @CraigJo98153674 @aswren 20% of a lower number of new cars sold. The same people would not be buying new cars. If you got rid of motability then you'd shut down car production and servicing centres. The cost of the taxpayer is zero. It's a private company operating this, not the UK gov.

1 0 0 22 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@CBRobber @thomasforth @HiddenYorkshire You are talking about PIP payments. It's completely irrelevant. The cost of motability to the tax payer is zero as they person on PIP still receives the money if it goes away. You're refusing to understand facts. That's nobody's issue but yourself.

1 0 1 29 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@purrrrrrrfectx @thomasforth @HiddenYorkshire That's great but no private person should have to explain themselves for this. I'd rather pay zero for you to have a car and for the government to profit from the scheme than fork out £1000s each week for you to receive a taxi everywhere. We both win, it's as simple as that.

0 0 3 157 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@CBRobber @thomasforth @HiddenYorkshire Cost to the taxpayer is zero. It's also a net positive for the government as they acrue tax on all of the leases and from the employees of the private company. The waste is in PIP, not motorbility. You've just spouting the same nonsense over and over. The facts are clear.

1 0 1 23 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@Wierdy1024 @thomasforth @HiddenYorkshire So the same effect, every company is subsidised in your reasoning. People can spend their pip on anything. There's nothing stopping a private company opening up the same company offering the same to everyone other than the ukgov.

0 0 2 92 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@CBRobber @thomasforth @HiddenYorkshire All that you are showing is envy and lack of understanding of market relationships.. If you offer a 15k car, you can't charge the full amount of mobility as evidenced by some cars being on offer for less than the claimant receives. If it made them more money they'd do it.

1 0 1 20 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@lumbago223 @CraigJo98153674 @aswren Something to fix, definitely. It's probably one of the only companies offering the ukgov value for money though. Again, I'm not a claimant.

1 0 0 20 0

View Details

Godwinson Dalliard @Acidmong

a year ago

@CBRobber @thomasforth @HiddenYorkshire I'm not eligible for anything on motorbility. Neither is anyone I know. I work full time and am a net contributor to the country. I simply understand business. People against this have no idea what they are talking about. Again, fix the cause i.e dodgy PIP claimants.