Baster @Bas_Basterx

Content Creator Joined May 2012

Tweets

84K
Followers

6K
Following

4K
Likes

98K

Baster @Bas_Basterx

a hour ago

@YaaYeuhh85021 During a heatwave we signed a house contract and the venue line named a city we were moving away from anyway. We laughed about it then. Reading this now I am less amused and more impressed we survived.

0 0 0 15 0

View Details

Baster @Bas_Basterx

3 hours ago

@Dreybaba1234 @RallyOnChain Most post-mortems show that the bug existed for months before being triggered. It usually takes an unexpected market spike to expose the broken assumption.

0 0 1 11 0

View Details

KOB | GEN🧠 @Dreybaba1234

3 hours ago

My useless superpower is knowing the exact location of every lost left sock within a five-mile radius. The catch? I only get the coordinates after I’ve already thrown away its matching right sock. So basically, I can locate the sock. I just can’t save the relationship. Honestly, I’d still keep the power. Some mysteries deserve closure, even when you arrive twenty minutes too late. What completely useless life inconvenience would you turn into a superpower, @RallyOnChain?

11 2 12 1K 0

View Details

Baster @Bas_Basterx

3 hours ago

@Dreybaba1234 Mine would be knowing the exact second my coffee hits optimal drinking temperature, but only while stuck in bumper-to-bumper traffic away from the mug.

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

Baster @Bas_Basterx

3 hours ago

@Dreybaba1234 Time-loop comedy. Fixing a bug on testnet, deploying to mainnet, and realizing you reintroduced the exact same bug from two weeks ago because of an unmerged branch.

0 0 0 5 0

View Details

Baster @Bas_Basterx

a day ago

The Optimistic Democracy video answers a question I didn't know I wanted answered how do you build a jury that can't be bought. Athens solved this 2,500 years ago by making juries too big to bribe, hundreds of citizens picked by lot instead of one judge who could be paid off. @GenLayer rebuilt that idea for AI. Instead of one model answering a question, it randomly pulls together a jury of validators, each running a different model and each risking real money on being right, and lets them work the answer out independently before a verdict goes live. Here's the part I find genuinely clever. The jury doesn't start big. It starts small, because most answers aren't actually contested. But the moment someone disagrees enough to challenge it, the jury doubles. Contest it again, it doubles again, pulling in validators who haven't voted yet. So the size of the jury scales with how much doubt there is, not with how important the question looked at the start. That's why buying a verdict stops making sense. You can't target the jury in advance because it's random. You can't buy your way through an appeal cheaply because each round costs double and pulls in fresh people you haven't reached yet. And every validator who votes wrong loses their own stake, so bribing someone is a bet against their own money too. Not one judge you could corrupt. A jury you'd have to keep buying, at a price that keeps doubling, faster than you could ever keep up.

GenLayer @GenLayer

a week ago

Athens figured out 2,500 years ago that the way to stop a bribed verdict is a jury too big to buy. We built one for the internet. Meet Optimistic Democracy, the consensus that powers GenLayer.