Just The Facts, Please @BoxFreeThinker

@MidWestDag9 @MW4Liberty In the way it’s utilized I’ve never asserted anything to the contrary. However, legally speaking, it remains perfectly legal. Don’t like that fact, but it is still a fact.

@SenWarren They charge this much because they can, because they know they have a government contract and they can bump the price as much and as often as they like. Now do the ACA.

@jeffersonation1 If you would sacrifice you principles and vote for something you are against to play the "enemy of my enemy" card, I'm not sure you understand Liberty at all.

@trampledbyzebra @MW4Liberty That's not at all what we were given access to in the PNW. Didn't even know they went cross-juristictional. Now I have questions. Thanks for the info. I appreciate it.

@trampledbyzebra @MW4Liberty Oh nice! No, every time I've had access it was under strict supervision and various forms of data were required. This is new, and now I want in... :)

Only if you're cooking it. And no they are not doing it NOW and no there is no bill at any state, local or federal lever as yet to pursue it. If there were, I would love to help you fight against it. Look, I don't like what we have NOW, but it's not what people are claiming it to be. What you do when you act as though it is only causes more people to get bad ideas from wrong information and causes more distrust, furthering the divide between "us" and "them" needlessly. If all you want is to take the mess we are in and stir the pot, at least be honest about it.

I didn't respond to take part in the conversation of them, but to point out that it is completely different than what we have. Yours is much closer to what we have currently (stationary monitoring) but it's still way too far outside the norm to be a concern worthy of discussion. IF, and I don't think it's possible without becoming a one party nation, we did have coverage of "100% of public spaces", the nation, and it's law enforcement agencies, would grind to a standstill. Catch up, mustard.

No. Because where I was a) too many were using it as a hustle to make it something anyone needed to TAKE and b) why be gay AND a rapist? I'm not sure where you were housed, but it sound repugnant. The convicts I was around would kill a rapist, and it wouldn't matter how or why. BEST case scenario, you get scalped or heavily scarred and sent to lock up until you could be transferred. Worst case, you just died. But rape? No, never saw or heard of it from anyone with anything but disgust.

@ragingcvntress @JillFilipovic Juvie? Bro, we played chess, hall ball, cards, watched movies and tried to score linen closet time with girls in the Hall. We were talking about PRISON.

Alpha is a new beast, and the thermal and low light have nothing to do with reading of license plates, though it may have some impact on that. Those are geared toward FRTs, and again have nothing to do with facial recognition or targeted surveillance. I don't have to try harder if you continue to make false assumptions and pair it with a lack of understanding the point of the conversation before you.

@LibertarianLars That does not look like a bond, and companies were born and grew long before the stock market existed. Will they explode like they do NOW?Now. And that's the entire point.

@pinktink49 @SkepticalAss @MW4Liberty Never said they did. Please read an entire thread before making assumptions. It will save us all a lot of time. I responded to very direct statements, and made very few assertions of my own.

@Newmex_e_kanr @SkepticalAss @MW4Liberty Never said it wasn't.

Then take on partners. Slowly build via other smaller endeavors. Talk with philanthropists. Asking people to double your money in 12 months is laughable, even with the current market. Not saying some companies wouldn’t offer it, if they have that much belief in their enterprise, but to expect that as a normal thing is ludicrous. No one year bond has a 90% yield. If those existed, no one would purchase anything else.

@TheTalkWatcher @nxt888 How? If I was wrong I would.

@t3nsor @RandyGay15 @NSKinsella How is being placed in the safest place you CAN be in a prison “inhumane”?

@alter3d @MW4Liberty Sorry but I only deal in facts, not hypotheticals. It’s also apples and airplanes to what flock cameras actually DO, which is something no one here seems to understand. Flock. Cameras. Do. Not. Monitor. People.

@trampledbyzebra @MW4Liberty Again, flock cameras track vehicles. They do not track people and they do not store data on “anyone in view”, nor do they use facial recognition.

But you’re not harmed and your original sentence cannot be extended pat the actual limit of time sentenced to. Again, a lot of these things that make prison more comfortable are things the general public don’t even know exist. And what are tablet privileges? I’ve never seen a PHONE, let alone a tablet in a prison. Hell you had to wait in line to make collect calls from a pay phone and HOPE your turn hit before the next roll call. Never see any personal electronic devices outside of a 13” or smaller TV or an AM/FM radio, and that’s if you were lucky enough to afford one. Also, you had to use headphones and the primary speaker was disabled.

@Olivia0945 @omgsidewalks It’s actually and factually not though.