DX-23 @DX23__

Price action trader. I post trades, discuss investment/trading strategy & like and RT useful info. London, England Joined October 2017

Tweets

2K
Followers

298
Following

1K
Likes

224

DX-23 @DX23__

2 years ago

@nishikoripicks It was for sure a gooooooood draw

0 0 0 236 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

2 years ago

@nishikoripicks Does it follow the same trend?

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

2 years ago

@liron @DavidDeutschOxf @FitzClaridge If GPT-4 wrote a best seller, it would be because of the creativity of people who made GPT-4 and provided the promt/prompts.

1 0 3 379 0

View Details

@seeley_nigel @premsportsplays @seancalvert1 Yeah it's very annoying. Also happened to me when backing Sock at 66/1 for the Paris Masters in 2017 because Federer withdrew 😭 (thanks @seancalvert1, I believe you tipped it?). With Tsitsipas, I got back £193.75 from a £5 ew bet (£10 total), which I believe is a 30% reduction.

0 0 0 50 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

2 years ago

@seeley_nigel @premsportsplays @seancalvert1 The suggested bookie was Betvictor - their terms below. "Should a player withdraw and not hit one ball in the specified tournament then all bets placed will be made void and any outright market which is affected by the withdrawal will be subject to a Tattersalls rule 4."

2 0 0 168 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

2 years ago

@quenio @ExplainsDeutsch @DavidDeutschOxf @DeutschExplains The answer is no, you cannot. "Hard to vary" is a theory about what makes an explanation good, and like any theory it is a fallible conjecture open to criticism. Validation in the sense you desire is not possible, which is what Deutsch is highlighting above.

1 0 0 64 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

2 years ago

@ellieekerr @Tesco @Tesco I have the same problem. Tried reinstalling, no difference. What is wrong with the app?

0 0 0 21 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

3 years ago

@nishikoripicks Qualies (all rounds) are even worse than 1st/2nd rounds. Finals also worse than the middle rounds. Sweet spot seems to be third, fourth, quarters, semis. Notably, this is true across all tours other than Grand Slams, where 3rd round is worse than 1st/2nd. (OnCourt data)

0 0 0 101 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

3 years ago

@nishikoripicks What's the average juice by odds range?

0 0 0 28 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

3 years ago

@TheBases5 @nishikoripicks Indeed, though you'd defo have got a fill at >8.5 given it spiked to 10, so his point is valid

0 0 0 27 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

3 years ago

@mansfield_pablo @arjunkhemani "From each as they choose" Everyone chooses how they spend their money, time, etc. "To each as they are chosen" Everyone receives from others what others choose to give them.

0 0 1 29 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

3 years ago

@SchoolerSport @SLSport_ Thank Andy. Do you know if any book other than Ladbrokes/Coral is offering a decent prices on Hurkacz most aces?

1 0 0 38 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

3 years ago

@nishikoripicks What about: big 3 priced 2+

0 0 1 534 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

3 years ago

@AdamHGrimes Good example of the two pullback entry types too. First, the failure test of the original high created after the 3 pushes. Second, the outside bar breaking below the lows of the consolidation. As you have said, one can build their entire trading framework soley around pullbacks.

0 0 4 248 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

3 years ago

@dela3499 👆

1 0 1 135 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

3 years ago

@Dan_Jeffries1 Bryan's argument is essentially that he does enjoy it. Hard to believe, but if we take it at face value, then 🤷

0 0 0 30 0

View Details

DX-23 @DX23__

3 years ago

@AriDavidPaul Thanks Ari. If you haven't read already, I'd really recommend David Deutsch's two books, Fabric of Reality and Beginning of Infinity. Covers many topics, most of which I feel you'd enjoy, and several of which have direct or indirect implications for how one understands morality.

0 0 1 43 1

View Details

Matjaž Leonardis @MatjazLeonardis

3 years ago

My argument against recursive self improvement is that "improve" is not a verb like "cook". It isn't something you can just do. All intentional efforts at improvement eventually get stuck and the only way to move past them is to stop trying to improve.