Emily @Emilyjbronte

I now think that Deb Roberts isn’t just being aggressive, controlling, condescending and lacking in emotional awareness of the impact of her behaviour towards others. I now think she is causing harm. @Annalisevigor1 : I’m so sorry for your loss, and sorry you have been exposed to the distasteful, repugnant comments you have from this woman. I hope you choose to address this through more official channels, as it won’t stop, and she is risking harming other people who post on here.

Annalise @Annalisevigor1

7 hours ago

@DebRoberts22249 I am Archie’s mother. I find it beyond disgusting you would even suggest there be any dishonesty about his life and death and even HINT at it being false. You seriously need to take a look at what you’re doing & saying and wonder what for. Before your causing more harm than good

2 6 46 1K 1

@DebRoberts22249 I am Archie’s mother. I find it beyond disgusting you would even suggest there be any dishonesty about his life and death and even HINT at it being false. You seriously need to take a look at what you’re doing & saying and wonder what for. Before your causing more harm than good

That shows all the babies on the indictment during the indictment period . Archie was outside the indictment period because they were only looking at when Lucy was on the unit Lucy had been placed on clerical duties when Archie was born and transferred and before operation hummingbird was launched Get your fact straight girls

Deb cannot and will not change her stance on Lucy Letby’s guilt, even if she’s exonerated, even if they had CCTV footage to categorically prove innocence, even if, in an ideal world, the consultants had a change of heart and confessed to going down a rabbit hole of fixating on Lucy Letby’s guilt rather than reflecting on broader hospital failings and their own inadequate practices. She’s too invested, and too singularly fixated on Letby being guilty. I don’t know what is personally driving her obsession, but that is not a healthy to be. Nothing will ever come from trying to reason with her, challenge her or shame her. It best to leave her be to live with herself and give her crazy ramblings no further oxygen.

Exactly. This case is not just about Lucy Letby. Its about the parents of the babies who passed away who need to know all the facts about what happened in the ward In addition its critical that everything that did happen in the ward is disclosed and whether anything that may have contributed to the deaths has been rectified Because it things have not been rectified then there may be a case of negligence not only in relation to the babies who passed away but the babies that may still be passing away because the need to cover up has become more important than the need to fix the system that may have contributed to the deaths in the first place🙏🙏🙏

@FMcclement32366 @DebRoberts22249 It's distressing to read this. This is the erosion of humanity seen when conspiracy theory really takes hold of someone. The parents at Sandy Hook were told they were ACTORS by conspiracy theorists. There really is no bottom to this.

Hi @FMcclement32366 Firstly I wanted to say how very sorry I am about your grandson, Archie. Secondly, please listen. No matter what you say to this woman, she has no shame and will stop at nothing and sink to any low in order to justify her narrative. Your story of poor care with your grandson threatens her & her narrative so much that her reaction typifies what has become her ever increasing unhinged hostility toward any such challenge. Quite frankly, she's an absolute disgrace. Block her, ignore her, you will not achieve anything by continuing to converse with this person. You shouldn't be made to feel guilty about asking questions and seeking the truth for your loved ones. Take care, Fiona, my best to you and your family X

@

57 years ago

0 0 0 0 0

Deb Roberts should understand that there is a line between expressing an opinion and publishing false or damaging claims about a real person and their family. Questioning my credibility and casting doubt on whether my grandson Archie even existed is not something I am prepared to ignore. Everything she has published is being documented. If she continues to make false statements or insinuations about me, Archie or my family, I will take legal advice and consider the appropriate action. She is entitled to her opinions. She is not entitled to invent her own facts about my family

I have unblocked you because I have nothing to hide. How date you even question whether my grandson Archie existed or whether my story is genuine. He did exist. He died aged 13 days after being transferred from the Countess of Chester Hospital to St Mary’s Hospital in Manchester with Echovirus 11. That is a matter of medical record, not opinion. I have never claimed Archie was one of the babies in the Lucy Letby indictment. My concerns relate to the care Archie received before his transfer, the questions surrounding his diagnosis and treatment, and comments that were made to his family. Those are separate issues that our family is entitled to raise. You are free to disagree with me, but implying that I am inventing or exploiting my grandson’s death is both false and deeply hurtful. If you are going to write about me publicly, please stick to facts rather than speculation about my motives or my family. Archie deserves better than that.

Inspections around the time Lucy Letby was in custody found huge oversight problems with the local CPS CCU units. The guidelines were then changed. Allegations that bear a strikingly specific resemblance to Lucy Letby's must now NOT be investigated by local units. (8/8)

There has never been an answer as to why the CPS broke their own rules in the Lucy Letby case. The recent decision to not press any further charges was made by the correct central SCCTD unit. The original charges were incorrectly handled by CPS North West.

Debbie Kennett 🧬🌳 @DebbieKennett

2 days ago

@RachelMaddiso15 @redrosesgrow @JulieYa10842350 @ClarkeMicah I don't know what rules would apply. In any case the local CPS broke their own rules as a high-profile case like this involving multiple alleged "murders" should have been investigated by the Complex Casework Units. x.com/DebbieKennett/…

2 5 16 2K 0

@rosiew5 I note that Dr Gibbs preached sermons on medical ethics. I wonder if he still does so knowing that Dewi Evans started with an outcome and worked backwards to construct a cause of harm? #Letby premierchristian.news/en/news/articl…

In general, reports no longer refer to LL as ‘serial child killer’ etc. This is major progress.

BBC North West @BBCNWT

3 days ago

Families of six babies lose bid to challenge Letby ruling bbc.in/4fSJs94

11 5 11 22K 1

@gigi7943170752 @redrosesgrow @Barry_19967 @mellycatslave @hairyairey @ContrarianJolly @RoseCaporale Are you this deliberately obtuse in the real world. Do you ignore/override expert advice from people like Doctors, Electricians, plumbers, solicitors etc. In areas you have no expertise in? These stupid word games you Letby Witchunter Cults play are moronic!

"Malcolm McHaffie, head of the CPS special crime division said: 'An extensive review of the case by a prosecutor independent of the original decisions, involving a re-examination of substantial evidence and material, has now been completed. "'Six offences of attempted murder were reconsidered in relation to six babies, but the review upheld the original decision not to bring any further criminal charges. "'The Crown Prosecution Service has written to the families involved and will offer meetings to answer any further questions.' "Letby was twice denied permission to appeal against her convictions in 2024. "However, the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which investigates potential miscarriages of justice, is considering evidence presented on her behalf by an international panel of medical professionals, who said poor medical care and natural causes were the reasons for the babies collapsing. "A public inquiry led by Lady Justice Thirlwall into how the neonatal nurse was able to commit her crimes is due to publish its findings later this year, on a date yet to be announced."

BBC North West @BBCNWT

3 days ago

Families of six babies lose bid to challenge Letby ruling bbc.in/4fSJs94

11 5 11 22K 1

@RichardHor54460 Notice Dewi Evans says breathing tubes can be dislodged easily in this report. Changed his tune again !

A new research report by Geoffrey Chase and Helen Shannon that may have relevance for the Lucy Letby case: "Inverted insulin to C-Peptide ratios in neonatal intensive care: is there something we don't know?" frontiersin.org/journals/pedia…

@maggiem67582865 @guyrowlanduk To me it hints that these families have been led to believe by police / lawyers that their babies were deliberately harmed before any such thing was established. Unforgivable.

After an appeal, the CPS say it is a "final decision" that there will be no more charges against Lucy Letby. They have offered to meet with parents to explain their decision. They previously said none of the charges met the evidential standard. dailymail.com/news/article-1…

Here's the list Gigi. The institutions involved are who I distrust, and they earned it themselves, and honestly, I think the whole thing has been a shambles from beginning to end, looking at all that has come to light. Starting at the beginning. This didn't start with forensic evidence pointing at a person. It started with suspicions raised inside the hospital, by the senior clinicians responsible for care on a unit whose care was itself failing. The staff warnings about that unit in real time are on record. The Royal College review is on record. The people who raised the alarm weren't neutral witnesses to events. They were part of the thing that was going wrong. The whole case grew from inside a building with every reason to want the explanation to be one person. And it came out that there was documented history between Lucy and her accusers. A grievance, resolved in her favour, an apology ordered. Yet those same accusers were treated like expert witnesses by the police and not suspects or at least hostile to the accused, as they should have been. Then the process. The above, kept from the jury. The defence asked for records and didn't get them, and the prosecution's own expert now says they should have. The same expert now under massive scrutiny. The swipe data was wrong and got reinterpreted after a jury had already failed to agree. What else got ruled in or out is for her lawyers and the CCRC, but it has not been an open and honest process with all facts before the jury by any estimates. And underneath all of it, a hospital that we know from our own lives does not volunteer the truth. Not to families. Not to anyone. So I don't hold one person responsible. I hold the culture of these institutions responsible. The culture of sitting on the truth until someone from outside comes looking. The culture of focusing on making evidence fit a predetermined narrative and burying the rest. The culture of our secretive and opaque justice system. Every institution in this story has it, the culture of treating us plebs like fools that don't deserve the truth. and until one of them breaks it, the distrust is on them. In other words; it's the boy who cried wolf. Lie to me a handful of times, or get caught lying a few times and all your credibility is gone for good. These institutions will lie to protect themselves at the cost of pretty much anything. And we've caught them many times. I don't think this situation is likely to be any different. And it is all coming out slowly but surely. If you were hoping for names, sorry to disappoint!