Julian Conradson @JCConradson

@monk_guita39679 @paleochristcon @ComicDaveSmith I've addressed it - repeatedly. You have no comeback but Egyptian planes and other bullshit. You are not even a person, you are a sackless annon who cant form their own opinions or have an original thought. Who white nights for Andrew wilson🤣😂😭

Sure, there kept their noses somewhat clean. Its undeniable that Charlie Kirk was Israel's last and most vocal defender when it comes to the young political movement in this country. His text messages/actions before the assassination were showing a clear break from that. If Kirk had turned on them publicly, it would have been a catastrophe of the highest order. Ergo, it is completely valid - even if you have to couch it in a hypothetical - that ISRAEL BENEFITTED from this murder. Especially considering all of the immediate skinsuiting and damage control in the immediate aftermath. Netanyahu didnt have to announce kirk was dead before Trump as just one example. But this is what the zionist does. They cannot help themselves. The hysterical finger pointing and denial by the cavalcade of shekel slaves and Israelis just adds fuel to the legitimate speculation that they had a hand in this. As for Andrew shilling for them - yeah by proxy via tpusa. Do you know who their donors are? Not that you could comprehend anyways.

@WillWalton67 @redsteeze Lol. Love the cope. Only a total sackless cuck would be demoralized. And yes. I know I know. Nothing - and I mean nothing - will get you to put down the kosher Kool-Aid and face reality. Good goy.

@WillWalton67 @atwaSDOK @redsteeze Wait till midterms.

Fair enough. That is more than most of these clowns would admit to. But, we have seen multiple things come to light (and mostly provided by candace by way of hard receipts like video/photos/witness testimony) that would indicate something more than the official narrative is at play here. Nobody is simply citing "feelings" here. Granted? There are certain aspects of this case where evidence has either been tampered with, not given, or lied about to an extent where you may have to infer, but that is because the feds/tpusa are not being transparent on this. Furthermore, Which accusation is baseless? The outright lies from ek and the rest of tp are verifiable. As for the semantics of saying she stated those words specifically - like I said meaningless. But that was cited by you and a big contention by Andrew in the debate. Again, irrelevant. And if you want to talk about baseless claims - the 'candace is doing it for the money' one you cite is just about as baseless as anything. Where do you get that from other than jew puppets on social? Pushing bullshit for clicks is literally a kosher talking point. And she doesnt back down to the challenge - she attempted to debate tpusa, she attempted to go toe to toe with others - they backed out. Andrew was the first to actually go into the room and duke it out - a fucking whole year later. As I said in my op - if this was overwhelming as every zio propagandist new x media shill says it is, this debate should have been a cakewalk. It wasnt because candace has delivered receipts over and over. Texts, witness testimony, photos, videos, tips, pinpointed whereabouts, etc. - most of which were verified by tpusa themselves because they were arrogant enough to think they could get away with lying about it. Lastly on the only doing it for the money accusations - 100+ million from israel to TPUSA being taken away because charlie is breaking on the jewish lobby and now they are just not interested in any questions and have been lying like its going out of style vs Candace's best friend being murdered in cold blood in questionable (to say the least) circumstances and demanding answers. If anyone is doing it just for the money its not candace.

@monk_guita39679 @paleochristcon @ComicDaveSmith From copy paste the same slop arguments to this ridiculous cope. Lol. I think we can call it here. You are unbearably goyish.

Cite the study. Where is it? In my experience, people like to skim/not even read shit they are provided with/talking about. Case in point - Andrew shitting the bed when asked to name a single charge against robinson lol. And no shit, a soft point bullet could theoretically fragment I mid air on the way to charlie before impact, but the unlikelyhood of that vs the likelihood of the 30-06 bullet doing what it normally does - meaning blow a hole through a damn moose - sounds like coping with feels to me. You clowns cant help the projection. Also, if you know anything about ammunition, softpoint rounds penetrate deeper and with more force because the partial metal jacket breaking apart keeps the bullet core tip from breaking apart. Plus a 30-06 weapon fired at that range on a downhill trajectory is humming with as much force that gun is capable of. Not only that, but in the deleted - and since revelaed by candace - footage of the shooter positioning on the roof and taking the shot, there is no obvious kickback on the rifle, which is immense with that weapon.

Hey fucktard - Doctored pics. And yes, that would tend to indicate to most sane people that something is not as it seems here. And you fell for jew slop again. There is the original doctored image released to the public, then there was the photo Candace released that was in HD and unedited, and finally (in frantic and poor damage control that only works on goyish fucks) a photoshopped version of the HD image was circulated on Social showing the distortion you mentioned. Plus they doctored the stairwell/outdoor parking lot images in the same way, compressed & degraded. And just want to ignore the completely cut video of the shooter climbing into position?

Lol. Just like andrew getting hung up on this in the debate - its meaningless. If you cant understand the notion of being careful with specific wording to avoid unnecessary legal action, then you are just, idk, dumb? And Show the clip. It never happened. She would have been sued into the stone age by now. And if im wrong and she did, That's even worse for your argument because if ek had no involvement and Candace said that on her platform and they havent sued her - that means they are terrified of discovery because they cant hide that shit if they give candace an open Crack at it in court. So since im apparently the one who doesnt care about evidence, you tell me as the guy claiming the states case is virtually bulletproof - what is the evidence that convinced you? The fact he is a leftist? Keep in mind that the bar to clear is Robinson acting alone, not that he was involved that day - no shit he was there and wrapped all up in this. Nobody is disputing that. Even candace at 0% that he pulled the trigger has him on/around campus before during and after the assassination.

Its been 12 straight months of debunking tpusa lies and fed slop bullshit. And you uncritically accept it as a "huge preponderance of evidence" like a good goy. And no. You, like Andrew are trying to dunk on candace because she is, what? a woman who says dumb shit and gets too in her feels sometimes? Newsflash jackass. Tis what a woman does. She shouldnt have to be the ONLY MOTHERFUCKER WITH ANY BALLS OUT THERE THAT IS PUBLICLY GOING TO WAR ON THIS ISSUE. And good on her she should be skeptical UNTIL IT IS PROVEN WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT that robinson acted alone. Anything short of that is fucking jew cucked treachery when it comes to the people in Kirks orbit.

She has never said "erika was complicit in her husbands murder" and rightfully so, at this point in the game - that is easy picking for tpusa's jew lawyers to throw the book at her. Obviously if ek is complicit in the cover up, she is complicit in the murder. That goes without saying/incriminating yourself. Why else do you think Andrew spent the entire debate trying to coax specific lyrics worded statements, because he was on a mission to make it an easy law suit. And just like the debate overall, He failed at that too. And I know, I know. Cleverness and critical thinking are not big in the @paleochristcon's manosphere of dipshits. Refreshing, no?

I think I have listed out my entire argument on this thread pretty clearly. And just like that shekel clown @paleochristcon, you go straight to bullshit obfuscation. Lol. You coping about Egyptian planes does not invalidate the legitimate questions and greviences I and countless others have about this case. But hey, what else can you expect from some Low IQ kosher cucked dipshit who is white nighting for 'debate overlord' shekel clown @paleochristcon.

@Akacd10 @ImperiumFirst Future truth tellers? Like a psychic? 🔮 😭😂🤣 Cope harder.

How credible is Seal Team 6 veteran Robert O'Neill? He says just about the same thing - something is off here. If anyone has credibility to speak on potential black ops/network, its him. Is @mchooyah a con artist? And as for the DNA on the gun, you can thank the prosecution's expert witness for admitting Tyler's DNA was the most degraded sample on the rifle.

Redacted @RedactedNews

2 days ago

ROB O’NEILL: “THE MORE I LOOK AT IT, THE LESS IT MAKES SENSE” Former Navy SEAL Robert O’Neill is challenging the official account of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, arguing that the tactical and forensic details raise more questions than answers. How did Tyler Robinson allegedly

131 1K 4K 81K 642

Holy shit, you just dont know what you are talking about at all. Candace was so out of favor with Charlie that he was prepping to have her speak at an upcoming TPUSA event on stage, and was texting with her about his most intimate and personal problems, including about his management of TPUSA and pressure by donors to Cut all ties with her - to which he said hell no. If anything this portion of the case establishes an extremely solid motive/incentive for Israel/Jewish Lobby to take him out. Especially considering the fact that he TURNED DOWN 100 MILLION from netanyahu to take "tpusa to the next level" and resisted several large jewish donors pressure to fall in line at the expense of millions more in funding. Since all you can do is shout mountain of evedince and spew kosher bullshit talking points to demean Candace, let's try this. In the hypothetical, what proof would you need to see that Robinson is a patsy? Because just like her concession, Andrew admitted he could be a patsy.

The pictures were degraded in quality and they were compressed. The full HD photos show a man with twice the build as Robinson in the garage. That's doctored. Furthermore, the video of the rooftop was also degraded and cut to show only the aftermath of the shot. Almost everything coming from the prosecution/feds has been suspect/edited in some way.

I would assume that would be THE very clear video evidence that shows its Tyler robinson taking the shot from a different view that these TPUSA/Israel aligned influencers like paramount tactical keep saying they have seen. Or a total verbal admission of guilt and that he acted alone during the trial. The likelihood of either happening? Virtually zero because we have corruption in our federal agencies of the highest order.

@Jonesy_2292 @paleochristcon @ComicDaveSmith Yeah? Admit their mistakes when proven wrong? thats what a normal person does who isn't on an agenda tapdancing for shekels. Like I said, she wont be proven wrong. Robinson did not act alone here.

So just to be clear, your overwhelmed by: Potentially fabricated texts that dont even prove he acted alone. Doctored/cut Video evidence that doesn't even look like robinson on the roof or in the garage. And Ballistic evidence that contradicts the norm of a 30-06's destructive force. Good goy.

@paleochristcon @ComicDaveSmith You did absolutely nothing to disprove the allegations and spent most of the time obfuscating on semantic bullshit. If the evidence is "overwhelming" as you claim, this debate should have been a cake walk, but here we are. You didn't earn your shekels on this one, clown.