James A. Smith @JamesASmith12

A nine-year-old girl sat down and wrote a letter to President Trump and @FLOTUS. Not to her principal. Not to the school board. To @POTUS. Her name is Brooklyn Rivera. She’s in third grade. In her own handwriting she told them what happened: a boy peeked under her stall and then pushed the door open while she was sitting there. She cried. The school did nothing. They told her boys can use the girls’ bathroom. And now she feels scared. @TheJusticeDept @usedgov

"I hate Mackinac so much." Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed is facing backlash over a resurfaced clip showing him repeatedly criticizing Mackinac Island, one of the state's most iconic tourist destinations. The footage, filmed during his 2018 gubernatorial campaign and later released in a 2020 documentary, shows El-Sayed saying he's "hated" the island every time he's visited. The clip is now going viral and drawing sharp reaction online, though some supporters argue his criticism was aimed at the Mackinac Policy Conference rather than the island itself. Fox News Digital reached out to El-Sayed's campaign for comment but did not receive a response.

🚨 THIS IS HOW ELECTIONS GET STOLEN 🚨 Scott Presler just DROPPED THE TRUTH on live TV at the York State Fair in Pennsylvania… and the establishment is TERRIFIED. While registering voters with Early Vote Action, he looked straight into the camera and DESTROYED the “noncitizen voting is tiny” lie: “In 2008, Al Franken was elected by 312 votes. In New Jersey, Governor Mikie Sherrill admitted 6,600 illegal aliens are on the voter rolls… and 400 of them VOTED. 400 is MORE than 312. Anyone who says 400 is a low number is LYING to your face. Congressman John Duarte lost by 187. Michelle Steel lost by 653. Mariannette Miller-Meeks won by SIX votes. I KNOW MY STATS.” Close elections are being decided by margins SMALLER than the number of noncitizens ALREADY documented on the rolls. Scott isn’t posting about it from a couch. He’s on the GROUND in Pennsylvania RIGHT NOW — cleaning the rolls, registering legal voters, and exposing the rot in real time. This is the work that actually saves elections. Support Scott Presler. Follow @ScottPresler. Amplify every post. Demand the SAVE America Act so ONLY CITIZENS decide the future of this country. America First starts with SECURE ELECTIONS. Everything else is noise. Share this like your country depends on it.

2018... President Trump. Let's beat this. Get the market up and finish Iran.

@overton_news So, will Jimmy Kimmel come on and talk... Inquiring minds want to know?

@SqSehrish 005

@hicasamadim 15 kg. Monkey...And that's one Gordo gatto...

Democrat Pride Month vs. Patriot Pride Month Sound on. Send it…🇺🇸🔥

@Gosleepriya 116

Even Arab leaders admit it. Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see. Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective. Ok, so let us set that aside. Now watch this. In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada. Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance. He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises. The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978. This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel. When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias. The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return. This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today. If you value the truth, please share.

@RightScopee Yes

@MikeBales The saddest part is there are those who actually think this is a good ticket...

BREAKING | Dit is de echte waarheid over Donald Trump — let goed op. Want onlangs stond een man genaamd Rand Paul — met tranen in zijn ogen — voor de hele wereld. En hij zei iets over Trump waar ik nog steeds van moet huilen. Senator Rand Paul voerde in 2015 bijna 200 staaroperaties uit in Haïti. Bij mannen en vrouwen die in volledige duisternis hadden geleefd. Mensen die al jaren het gezicht van hun kinderen niet meer hadden gezien. Mensen die elke ochtend wakker werden in een wereld die voorgoed grijs was geworden. En toen Rand Paul financiering nodig had voor die missie — pakte hij de telefoon en belde hij Donald Trump. Die nog geen kandidaat was. Die er niets bij te winnen had. Die geen stemmen te winnen had en geen camera’s achter zich aan had. En Trump zei ja. Onmiddellijk. Hij werd een van de grootste financiers van die hele reis. En hield er vervolgens volledig zijn mond over. Geen enkele post. Geen enkele aankondiging. Geen enkel woord. En toen, jaren later, stond Rand Paul in NBC's Meet The Press, met tranen in zijn ogen, en vertelde hij de hele wereld wat Trump had gedaan. Hij zei: "Ik weet zeker dat Donald Trump heel veel om de mensen van Haïti geeft. Omdat hij hielp bij de financiering van een reis waarbij we 200 mensen hun gezichtsvermogen konden teruggeven." Tweehonderd mensen. Die op een ochtend wakker werden – terwijl het verband langzaam werd verwijderd – en hun families voor het eerst in jaren weer zagen. Een oude man genaamd Saint Fleur zat volkomen sprakeloos. Toen fluisterde hij: “Ik zie. Ik zie.” En hij reikte met trillende handen uit – en omhelsde iedereen om hem heen. Dat ene moment gebeurde omdat Donald Trump stilletjes een cheque uitschreef. Zonder camera’s. Zonder erkenning. Zonder aankondiging. En hij heeft er nooit iemand iets over verteld. Mijn vrouw hoorde dit vanavond, pakte mijn hand en zei: “Een man die 200 vreemden hun gezichtsvermogen teruggeeft en het aan niemand vertelt – dat is geen show. Dat is gewoon wie hij werkelijk is.” Bid vanavond voor die 200 mensen in Haïti die de wereld weer konden zien. En bid nog harder voor de man die ervoor zorgde dat ze dat konden. Is er iemand in je leven die stilletjes iets voor een vreemde heeft gedaan dat alles heeft veranderd – en daar nooit erkenning voor heeft gevraagd?

@WallStreetApes @Terrij7Terri Damn right. Indictments, convictions, and sentencing. Nothing else will expose this.

@Real_RobN @JtShaggy @CIADirector Unless the public sees indictments AND Convictions the media will deny deny deny and the left die hards will never believe a word. Trials and Conviction with extreme punishment is the only answers.

🚨Peak Obama hypocrisy just hit different.🚨 Watching Barack Obama lecture President Trump about the “dangers” of weaponizing the DOJ against political opponents — with ZERO remorse for what his own side did — proves exactly what a colossal hypocrite he is. Here’s the actual record of lawfare they unleashed on Trump and Republicans: Obama laid the foundation: • Crossfire Hurricane: FBI launched a full counterintelligence op on the Trump campaign using the fake Steele dossier (Clinton-funded dirt). FISA abuse on Carter Page, spies in the campaign, illegal unmaskings. Obama was briefed. • IRS scandal: Conservative and Tea Party groups systematically targeted, harassed, and delayed for years while liberal ones got fast-tracked. Lois Lerner and the rest weaponized the tax code. Biden turned it into all-out war: • Four bogus indictments designed to bankrupt, gag, and jail Trump during the campaign — Manhattan hush-money zombie case, Georgia RICO election nonsense, Jack Smith’s two federal cases. • Coordinated raids, leaks, gag orders, and endless lawfare from DOJ, local Democrat prosecutors, and the White House. • Hunter Biden sweetheart treatment while Trump world got the full Gestapo. They tried to remove him from ballots, brand him a “convicted felon,” bankrupt him, and lock him up — all to rig the election. Then Obama has the nerve to lecture about “democracy” and “norms”? No apology. No sympathy for the victims. Just more gaslighting. This is why trust in institutions collapsed. Americans watched the Russia hoax, IRS abuse, two impeachments, and lawfare circus in real time — and they rejected it. Trump survived it all and won anyway. The American people saw through the weaponization of justice. Share this far and wide. The hypocrisy needs to be called out every single time. No more pretending. 🇺🇸 #ObamaHypocrisy #Lawfare #WeaponizedDOJ #TwoTieredJustice #TrumpWon #DeepStateExposed #AmericaFirst #HypocriteInChief

Alright. I need everyone to look at this. Not skim it. LOOK AT IT. Because what happened in the last 24 hours on this platform is one of the most breathtaking displays of coordinated dishonesty I have ever seen from elected officials -- and I have been watching these people for a long time. I am a science teacher. I grade papers for a living. I know when someone copied. They ALL copied. Let me show you exactly what I mean. @SenWarren: "safe and effective" @PattyMurray: "safe and effective" @RonWyden: "safe, full stop" @RepJohnLarson: "safe and effective. Full stop." @RepBeccaB: "safe and effective" @RepDelBene: "safe & effective" @RepGregStanton: "safe and effective" @SenatorHassan: "safely used for years" @SenatorHick: "safe and FDA approved" @TeamPelosi: "access to mifepristone" SenatorCantwell: "safe medication" SenMarkey: "SAFE and LEGAL" repdeliaramirez: "safe and reliable" That is not a coincidence. That is a MEMO. Someone in the DNC wrote those words, sent them to every caucus member, and these supposed independent representatives of the American people just... pasted it in. Changed a word here. Added an exclamation point there. Slapped their name on it. And then had the audacity to call YOU their constituent. Here is the part that should make your blood boil regardless of where you stand on abortion: these people are telling you -- openly, demonstrably, provably -- that they either did not read the court ruling, are not smart enough to understand what they read, or are perfectly fine lying to your face because they think you are too stupid to check. Pick one. Those are the only options. Here is what the ruling ACTUALLY says -- you know, the document none of them apparently opened: The Fifth Circuit issued a TEMPORARY STAY of the 2023 FDA rule change that allowed mifepristone to be mailed without any in-person medical visit. The drug is NOT BANNED. Not restricted from in-person dispensing. Not removed from any shelf anywhere. It is back to the rule that existed for TWENTY YEARS from 2000 to 2023 -- a rule that nobody called a "nationwide abortion ban" at the time because it was not one then and it is not one now. The ruling was triggered by the FDA's OWN ADMISSION that the 2023 rule had "procedural deficits" and a "lack of adequate consideration." Biden's Autopen's own agency admitted it FAILED to adequately study whether mailing the drug without in-person oversight is safe. The court held the FDA to its own documented standards. That is not extremism. That is administrative law. But sure. Tell your constituents it is a nationwide abortion ban. His dog's trying to teach him new tricks and getting nowhere. Now. Let me go through the highlight reel. @PattyMurray and @SenatorHassan and @RepGregStanton. Oh boy. Sen. Murray wrote "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." Sen. Hassan wrote "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." Rep. Stanton wrote -- I want you to read this carefully -- "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." WORD. FOR. WORD. Three separate officials. Three separate states. One brain between them and they are sharing it on a rotating schedule. Isn't it dangerous to use your whole vocabulary in one sentence? Because apparently they only have the one. @SenWarren decided that "a conservative court packed with Trump-appointed judges" was the headline -- except, Senator, one of the three judges on that panel is a George W. Bush appointee. That is a fact available to anyone who spent thirty seconds on the first page of the ruling. You did not spend thirty seconds. You spent zero seconds. And then reported to your constituents anyway. Running on dial-up in a fiber-optic world and mad at the court for having internet. @RonWyden called it "a nationwide abortion ban." Full stop. Thirty years in the Senate. The man has been in that chamber since 1996. He has seen more legislation than most people have had hot meals. And his contribution to this moment is a tweet calling a mailing rule stay "a nationwide abortion ban." Thirty years of accumulated nothing. I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and poop out a more accurate legal summary than that. @repdeliaramirez called for making "#RoeVWade the law of the land." In response to an Administrative Procedure Act ruling about an FDA mailing regulation. These are DIFFERENT CASES. Different courts. Different legal questions. Different decades. She does not even know what she is commenting on. More confused than a chameleon in a bag of Skittles and still found a way to get 2,000 retweets on it. @RepBeccaB actually said -- and I quote -- "Whether it's taken at home or in a medical setting has no impact on that fact." No impact. The FDA's own label reports 2.9 to 4.6 percent of women prescribed mifepristone IN PERSON require emergency care. The court record explicitly states mailing without oversight INCREASES those risks. The setting has a documented, quantified, FDA-certified IMPACT on patient safety outcomes. She told her constituents the exact opposite of what the FDA's own documentation states. That is not a misunderstanding. That is a lie with a congressional letterhead. @SenMarkey said "blocking access to it isn't about safety -- it's about control." Senator. The court's ENTIRE analysis -- all 18 pages -- was about safety. Specifically the FDA's own admission that it never adequately studied the mailing safety. The court cited the FDA's documented safety failures. You told Massachusetts the court ruling about safety is not about safety. I genuinely do not know what your problem is, but I am guessing it is hard to pronounce. @TeamPelosi -- the former Speaker of the House of Representatives -- said Republicans "don't like birth control." Mifepristone is not a birth control medication. Birth control PREVENTS pregnancy. Mifepristone terminates an EXISTING pregnancy. These are pharmacologically and legally distinct categories that a Speaker of the House should be able to distinguish. The pilgarlic performance from someone who once wielded the Speaker's gavel is genuinely something to behold. @amyklobuchar -- to be fair -- was the ONLY one who got close to accurate. She said "by mail" instead of inventing a ban. She gets half a point for basic literacy. The bar is subterranean and she barely cleared it but she cleared it. You bring everyone so much joy, Senator. You know, when you leave the room. But still. @CAgovernor Gavin Newsom joined the party. Not a member of Congress -- a governor. But same talking points, same memo, same lies. Newsom is the same guy who apparently once said Governor Greg Abbott "doesn't have the backbone." Governor Abbott, for anyone who does not know, is paralyzed from the waist down due to a severed spine from a 1984 accident. Newsom has more nerve than spine, which is apparently the qualification for running California into the ground. Here is the thing that keeps me up at night. Not the politics. The PATTERN. If a CITIZEN lies to a member of Congress, that is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. Up to FIVE YEARS in federal prison. Substantial fines. That is what happens when YOU lie to THEM. If a member of Congress lies to 335 MILLION citizens? That is just a Friday. And that Friday apparently comes with a DNC memo and a coordinated social media rollout and zero accountability whatsoever. Trying to reason with some of these folks is like trying to baptize a cat. But I am going to keep doing it anyway -- because SOMEBODY has to drag these lies into the light, and I have tenure, a science background, and nothing but time. @RepPressley @SenWarren @RoKhanna @PattyMurray @RonWyden @SenatorCantwell @SenatorHassan @RepJohnLarson @RepBeccaB @RepDelBene @RepGregStanton @amyklobuchar @repdeliaramirez @SenMarkey @SenatorHick @TeamPelosi @CAgovernor You are all on record. Every lie. Every talking point. Every copy-pasted word. And I am just getting started. America was founded by geniuses. These people are proof the trend did not hold. But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher and Army combat medic who read the 18-page ruling, can define arbitrary and capricious agency action, knows the difference between a mailing rule and an abortion ban, and understands that when fifteen elected officials post the SAME WORDS on the SAME DAY about a ruling NONE OF THEM CITED -- that is not democracy. That is a poltroon parade dressed up as representation. IF THIS MADE YOU THINK: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this -- every single share matters. There is someone on your timeline right now being lied to by one of these names. COMMENT "YES" below if you want me to keep calling them out by name. One by one. With receipts. Because I have all of them. JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. Subscribe to my account -- about the cost of a cup of coffee a month. Your support keeps this classroom open. And I promise I will never run out of material as long as the left keeps trying to out-dumb itself. @JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2 #MAGA #Veterans #Trump Let me add one more thing. And yes, I am going to repeat it. Because it is THAT important and some things deserve to be said twice. Quinn's Law Number One: "Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent." Read that again. Every. Single. Time. These fifteen officials told you they are fighting FOR women. They told you they are protecting women's health. They told you this ruling puts women's lives at risk. But here is what they did not tell you -- because not one of them read the ruling. The FDA's OWN safety label states that 2.9 to 4.6 percent of women prescribed mifepristone IN PERSON require emergency care. The court record -- the 18 pages none of them opened -- explicitly documents that mailing the drug WITHOUT in-person medical oversight INCREASES those emergency care risks. Louisiana showed $92,000 in Medicaid costs from real women who ended up in real emergency rooms from mifepristone complications in 2025 alone. Nearly 1,000 cases per month. The court reinstated in-person oversight BECAUSE women were being harmed. Let that land. The ruling these members of Congress are calling an "attack on women" was issued BECAUSE women were getting hurt WITHOUT proper medical supervision. The in-person requirement they are screaming about EXISTS to make sure a doctor is present when complications occur. Reinstating it is not a war on women. It is a basic medical safety standard that these officials -- in their coordinated, memo-driven, copy-pasted outrage -- are actively fighting to REMOVE. Quinn's Law Number One. They say they are protecting women. Their position, if it succeeded, would result in MORE women in emergency rooms with NO doctor present. The exact opposite of their stated intent. Every single time. Without exception. You could set a watch by it. I want to say that one more time for the people in the back who are still reading the talking points memo instead of the court document. THEY. ARE. FIGHTING. TO. REMOVE. MEDICAL. OVERSIGHT. FOR WOMEN. While telling you they are protecting women. And here is the part that should stop you cold. Not one -- NOT ONE -- of the fifteen names I tagged in this post can tell you what a woman IS. Their party spent years insisting that only a biologist can define a woman. Well. I am a science teacher. I will do it for free. A woman is an adult human female -- the sex of an organism that produces large gametes, organized around ovarian development and the reproductive anatomy that supports gestation. That definition comes from developmental biology, evolutionary biology, endocrinology, and medicine. It is in the textbooks. It is not controversial in any field that studies living organisms. But ask @SenWarren. Ask @PattyMurray. Ask @RoKhanna. Ask @repdeliaramirez -- who cannot even identify which court case she is commenting on, let alone which biological category she is defending. They cannot define a woman. They cannot tell you what a woman is. But they are absolutely certain -- CERTAIN -- that they know what is best for women's bodies, women's healthcare, and women's lives. And they know it so thoroughly, so completely, so confidently, that they do not need to read the ruling. They do not need to check the FDA's own safety data. They do not need to acknowledge the real women in Louisiana emergency rooms. They do not need to define their terms. They just need the memo. Paste it in. Hit send. Collect the fundraising email donations that go out twenty minutes later. That is not advocacy. That is not protection. That is not fighting for anyone. That is using women as a political prop by people who cannot even name what a woman is -- while simultaneously fighting to strip away the medical supervision that exists specifically to keep women safe. Quinn's Law Number One. The exact opposite. Every time. I am a science teacher. I have spent my career explaining how the natural world actually works rather than how people wish it worked. Reality does not care about your talking points. Biology does not care about your memo. And the women in those Louisiana emergency rooms do not care about your fundraising email. The truth is the truth whether or not fifteen members of Congress choose to read it. But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher who can define a woman, read a court brief, interpret FDA safety data, and identify when the people claiming to protect someone are actively making the situation more dangerous for that someone. Apparently a rare combination on Capitol Hill. Comment YES below if you want me to keep going. Because I have more names, more lies, and more receipts than they have talking points. @JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2 #MAGA #Veterans #Trump

@BskiMike22802 YES

Dear Senator Sanders, Oh, this is RICH. This is so perfectly, exquisitely, weapons-grade rich that I had to put down my anatomy exams and just... appreciate it for a moment. The man who got thrown out of a SOCIALIST HIPPIE COMMUNE in Vermont in 1971 — after THREE DAYS — for refusing to do any actual work while everyone else planted, harvested, and hauled water, is out here telling me the OLIGARCHS want to control everything. Three. Days. The communists gave you a longer trial period than most employers give to someone who steals from the register. Here is what Jim Quinn's Law Number Two says, and I want every single person reading this to tattoo it somewhere useful: "If you want to know what liberals are up to, pay attention to what they accuse conservatives of doing." Senator, you OWN THREE HOMES. A Burlington residence. A D.C. townhouse. A $575,000 vacation lake house in North Hero, Vermont — purchased in 2016, the same year you were touring the country telling college students the system is rigged. Your net worth sits somewhere between $2.5 and $3 million. You have pocketed over $2.5 MILLION in book royalties since 2011. That elevator is clearly not stuck between floors for you, is it. And then — THEN — during your "Fighting Oligarchy Tour" with AOC, you spent over $550,000 in CAMPAIGN FUNDS on PRIVATE JET TRAVEL. Half a million dollars on luxury jets to lecture working Americans about the dangers of wealth. When Fox News caught you boarding a Bombardier Challenger 604 — a jet that runs up to $15,000 PER HOUR — you did not apologize. You did not even blink. You looked directly into the camera and said, and I am quoting this verbatim because it is the most accidentally honest thing you have ever said: "You think I'm gonna be sitting on a waiting line at United?" Senator. THAT IS OLIGARCHIC THINKING. That is TEXTBOOK "the rules apply to you people, not to me." That is the elevator music of every single billionaire you have spent 35 years pretending to oppose. In a battle of wits with your own stated beliefs, you showed up completely unarmed. Thirty-five years in Congress. You know what your personal legislative output looks like? Eight bills passed. EIGHT. In three and a half DECADES. That works out to 0.23 bills per year. I have produced more graded anatomy exams in a single semester. Your two greatest solo legislative achievements — the ones with your name on top, the thing YOU actually DID — are the naming of a post office in Danville, Vermont, and the naming of a post office in Fair Haven, Vermont. You named. Two. Post offices. You are as useful as a screen door on a submarine when it comes to actually passing legislation, but you want me to believe you are the vanguard of the working class. That sounds like a YOU problem. Quinn's Law #25: "Liberals are great at giving away other people's money." You have been living PROOF of that law for 35 years. You give away everyone else's money — from a vacation home on a lake — while spending half a million on jets because you are far too important to wait in line with the taxpayers funding your lifestyle. You want to talk about oligarchs controlling the media? You have been IN the media for four decades. You just finished a $75 million documentary. You have a book deal. You have a podcast. You HAVE the megaphone and you are using it to tell people that other people have the megaphone. The gene pool really needed a lifeguard for THAT particular reasoning. I am a high school science teacher in Northeast Ohio. I support a family of six on a teacher's salary. I am not particularly impressed by a man with three houses, $550,000 in jet receipts, and 0.23 bills per year telling me he stands with the working class. More famous than wise, Senator. More famous than wise. The hippie commune knew it in 72 hours. How long is it going to take everyone else? IF you agree: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this. COMMENT below — do YOU think a man with three homes and a half-million dollar private jet habit speaks for working Americans? Tell me. And if you want MORE of this — the data, the history, the science, the stories — JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. But what do I know — I am only a science teacher who can actually do math, a retired Army combat medic who knows what genuine sacrifice looks like, and apparently one of the few people left who finds it suspicious that the most vocal enemy of oligarchy just cannot bring himself to wait in line at the airport with the rest of us. @JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2 #MAGA #Veterans #Trump

🚨 REP. WESLEY HUNT (R-TX) just gave the PERFECT response: Q: There won't be any black Republicans left in the House? HUNT: "It's not relevant." "I'm not here because I'm black." "I am here because I am a qualified representative for Congressional District 38." "The American people choose who they want to choose." "I don't want to get into this game of RACE BAIT all day, every day." "If there's 4? If there's 10? If there's NONE." "I represent a white majority district that President Trump would have won by over 20 points, and I won by over 25 points." "I'm being judged not by the color of my skin, but the content of my character." 🇺🇸🇺🇸 📽️ @PabloReports @WesleyHuntTX