C👀Prince @JavaKairo

Why is Tinubu k!lling children? Last night, Nuhu ribadu’s islamic brothers k!lled 15 children and atleast 20 adults in fresh attack to advance total Islamization of Nigeria. The attack happened at Naridon Village in Kamaru Ward, Kauru Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Yoruba government has failed!

10 225 277 4K 3

View Details

C👀Prince @JavaKairo

2 days ago

@HardBStrain Both

0 0 0 446 0

View Details

Avril Amaka @avrilamaka

2 days ago

I have never been in a physical fight, I am a lady, not a komodo dragon. One question per post, don't be greedy 😂

Avril Amaka @avrilamaka

5 days ago

This is a safe space 🌝 ngl.link/avrilamaka21141

2 6 24 46K 1

7 5 31 1K 0

View Details

Abia Daily @myabiadaily

2 days ago

Hello Enyimba City!

Abia Daily @myabiadaily

2 days ago

Hello Umuahia!

4 21 262 16K 1

9 52 468 13K 8

View Details

C👀Prince @JavaKairo

2 days ago

@myabiadaily I wish Abia tower will look like these @alexottiofr @kepukepunews

1 0 3 176 0

View Details

Abia Daily @myabiadaily

3 days ago

Abia Daily is suspecting that this character is very close to a local government chairman and he’s hoping to fix his pipe through that person to suck Abia’s resources. But that won’t happen. Every fund coming into Abia must be used judiciously. NO MORE STOMACH INFRASTRUCTURE! It’s over. Get something doing.

Chikwere @NwekereNdoki

3 days ago

@myabiadaily Imagine wetin a whole Governor dey do Chai..... This is really unfortunate Otti is really mistepping. What is the work of the LGA Chairmen they spent money to do elections for? Ukwa East allocation can buy transformers for all communities in Ukwa East LGA 2 months God 🤦‍♂️

9 0 3 12K 0

10 21 123 9K 5

View Details

C👀Prince @JavaKairo

3 days ago

@BestofDem_szn Difference dey o

0 0 0 31 0

View Details

C👀Prince @JavaKairo

3 days ago

@Youthinprocess @ARISEtv Loud it but I am sure 95% of them will prefer going to religious tour

0 0 1 2 0

View Details

_agobbs @agobbs_

3 days ago

The Igbo women assaulting their maids are currently in church falling under anointing and kabashing in tongues sherimama shantaraba 😹

1 3 2 135 0

View Details

C👀Prince @JavaKairo

3 days ago

@TheDamiForeign Poor me 😞

0 0 1 12 0

View Details

aloy ejimakor @AloyEjimakor

3 days ago

This video is poignant. It contains very serious allegations of a creeping tribal (not religious) genocide in the core North, plus much more alarming things. And it bears a trove of public intelligence that deserves the immediate attention of the authorities.

33 381 500 12K 55

View Details

King JB @ala_nso

3 days ago

Dear sir @PNMbah stop giving ungrateful tribalistic id!ots igbo jobs! We have reputable hands to manage our things! Please don’t use people’s lives to play! Ewedu people are incompetent in everything they do!

12 27 103 2K 0

View Details

C👀Prince @JavaKairo

3 days ago

@lydiaavian256 🤣

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

C👀Prince @JavaKairo

3 days ago

@BestofDem_szn 🤣

0 0 1 14 0

View Details

Lilian Ogechi @Adaigboglobal

3 days ago

Abia State Security Operatives Arrest Samuel Taiwo, from Ogun For Stealing Wires At Nnenna Otti Bus Terminal, Ụmụahia

160 643 2K 58K 73

View Details

aloy ejimakor @AloyEjimakor

3 days ago

Tinubu’s US fund forfeiture is a moral question, not criminal By ALOY EJIMAKOR Tinubu’s US fund forfeiture raises moral question but it’s not criminal. I know this for sure, because I trained and practiced law in the US for several years, during which I represented a handful of Africans (mostly Nigerians and Cameroonians) in similar forfeiture proceedings. And barring a few, the rest forfeited some money but lived happily ever after as un-convicted persons. To be sure, under U.S. law, the distinction between a criminal conviction and a civil asset forfeiture is foundational and statutorily distinguished from each other. The certified record of the pertinent proceedings in the Tinubu case show that the 1993 forfeiture of $460,000 from bank accounts linked to President Tinubu was strictly a civil in rem proceeding, not a criminal in personam conviction. Strictly governed by 18 U.S.C. § 981, civil forfeiture targets property based on its connection to alleged unlawful conduct, rather than establishing personal criminal liability. It is under this law that the US government (in United States v. Funds in Account No. 263226700 et al., No. 93 C 4483 (N.D. Ill.) filed a CIVIL complaint directly against the Tinubu funds or bank accounts, thus resulting in a compromised settlement without a judicial finding of guilt. Contrast with the very next provision, to wit: 18 U.S.C. § 982 which specifically deals with CRIMINAL forfeiture and thus requires a finding of guilt and a personal conviction. Truth be told, this is not what happened in the Tinubu matter. But even in the US, the matter was controversial until 1996 when, in United States v. Ursery, 518 U.S. 267 (1996), the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that civil in rem forfeitures are civil, non-criminal remedial actions against property, distinct from criminal punishment which is considered in personam. It was under this principle that the Tinubu funds were considered property, connected to alleged unlawful conduct, but sans criminal liability. While critics are free to leverage the underlying allegations of narcotics proceeds to argue moral turpitude or fitness for public office, the legal reality remains distinct, and that is: Tinubu was never charged, tried, or convicted of a crime. Therefore, conflating his civil asset forfeiture with a criminal guilt misinterprets statutory mechanics and the binding judicial precedents on point. And this is just an unbiased restatement of the black letter law, not any support for President Tinubu. After all, his men harshly detained me for several days in October last year for allegedly participating in the #FreeNnamdiKanu protest, for which I am still on trial that comes up on 31st July. #AloyEjimakor.