KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

Joined April 2024

Tweets

2K
Followers

2K
Following

155
Likes

32K

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

5 days ago

@DocStrangelove2 What is that chambered in?

1 0 0 82 0

View Details

@ConeOfArc Of the primary 3 mediums of the war (T-34/M4 and P4) the Sherman had the best armor and most room for growth. The P4 has an advantage over 75mm armed Shermans at longer ranges and the T-34/85 has a more capable HE shell than the 76mm armed M4 but the M4 really is just fantastic.

0 0 3 166 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

2 weeks ago

@WKoumrian @JimmyThomist That’s my take as well, in addition they’re remarkably short ranged compared to say a 12.7x108mm cartridge. You don’t want a short effective range against kamikaze drones.

0 0 3 29 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

2 weeks ago

@JimmyThomist Provided they hit the fragile motors or propellers/struts sure. But that’s a difficult target on a fast moving drone which will be rapidly closing through the short effective range envelope of your .22lr machine gun. Meanwhile a .50cal has to hit it once.

0 0 4 57 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

2 weeks ago

@yugoslav_luka @saturn74954 Bulsae-4A is one of the names I’ve seen attached to the Tandem Warhead Bulsae-4, there is also the original 2006 Unitary warhead known as Bulsae-4 and there’s a Thermobaric warhead as well but I don’t know much about it.

0 0 0 25 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

2 weeks ago

@GreatPoppo @315th_IGNIB Which unit is it then?

0 0 2 109 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

2 weeks ago

@KrypTanko That’s an excellent design, wonder why it failed selection as a SPAAG

0 0 2 301 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

3 weeks ago

@saturn74954 It’s the 2016 model, improved guidance for longer range (the missile can receive guidance out to about 4km), tandem warhead instead of unitary.

1 0 2 108 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

3 weeks ago

@saturn74954 I see, those are Bulsae-4A specifically Bulsae-3 isn’t well defined beyond potentially being the NK produced Konkurs

1 0 2 81 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

3 weeks ago

@saturn74954 No Bulsae-3 is likely but unconfirmed, the DPRK Konkurs.

1 0 2 103 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

3 weeks ago

@Luumusaha @T_90_M_2024 Previously it was believed to be a 30mm but Oryx is saying it’s a Juche 40mm and I trust his judgement.

1 0 2 36 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

3 weeks ago

@Jumpy_Quirrel @Korea_Defense The Songun has a 2A46M 125mm. The Chonma 20 is likely either a very high pressure 115mm or a bespoke 125mm as it has unitary ammunition unlike every other 125mm gun. Though there is a low possibility it’s a 120mm.

1 0 9 105 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

3 weeks ago

@saturn74954 I’m talking about the rifles. Type 68 is a common designation over in the DPRK. But yes the tanks are Type-59s

0 0 1 23 0

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

3 weeks ago

@yugoslav_luka @IndexSabot It wouldn’t shock me if once once SPGs and Missiles take priority over these.

0 0 2 125 0

View Details

Iron Heart @saturn74954

3 weeks ago

North Korean Type 59 tanks during an exercise, late 1970s. Troopers are armed with AK-47s, AKSs, and Type 73 machine guns. They are supported by fire from MiG-17s.

4 56 330 12K 99

View Details

KPAWeaponsTracker @KPAWeapons

3 weeks ago

@Death1nFire I genuinely wonder how long those satellites will stay up in a war between people capable of space flight. Seems like a no brainer to begin knocking them out of orbit.