Kevin Mak @KevinLMak

Yeah, it’s definitely not an auction, despite that making some sense. At IBKR they assign the buy-in pro-rata across every account that is short. At many “typical” prime brokers it is far worse, where they profile customers, age of their short position, etc and discriminately pick who gets bought in etc. Market opaqueness always favors the person running the market. No different from ipo/secondary allocations etc (which also doesn’t closely resemble a fair or efficient market) cohenmilstein.com/case-study/sto…

How do Robinhood investors do in aggregate? Not very well. They manufactured more than 15% in negative alpha per annum between 2020 and 2025 for more sophisticated investors to harvest. Plot below of aggregate Robinhood returns against a 13/76/11 SPX/QQQ/BTC fitted benchmark. The real cost of access to zero-commission platforms for retail investors is perhaps best understood as a behavioral one. These investors can’t help themselves, trade way too much and don’t seem to have market timing ability. Maybe they’re just having a bit of fun but this seems like an expensive pastime. thetwocents.substack.com/p/modern-day-r…

@SpaceGrammys @LeoSat248 @DefinitionsNew I take no pleasure in other people’s losses.

@gaBrieleTC21 Wait till you see my next write up ;)

I’m not a crypto maxi or crypto anything, but isn’t the point of a lot of this stuff not to discriminate? Seems weird to want to discriminate against big capital. Also seems weird/hard to really distinguish one guy with 10,000 small accounts versus one big account, I assume this stuff I’d generally supposed to be pseudonymous… On the “big corps take billions from degens every year” claim… just wanted to point out it’s the disintermediation of the friction that you’re solving. Yes mgm makes lots of money, but a large portion of that money is distributed to shareholders. These shareholders are, by and large, general society as a whole. Pension, endowments, insurance companies, mutual funds, etc. From that pov, your system is generally more efficient (zero administration costs/frictions) but is not entirely different.

This is the most practically useful application of defi/crypto I’ve ever seen.

Finn Hulse @finn_hulse

2 months ago

in the future, casinos won't make money a single (huge) crowdfunded pool will power millions of near-fair bets across apps and AI agents all house profits will flow back to everyone's buy-ins automatically providing the best yield in the world to its owners testnet now live

34 19 140 78K 83

A quick one on a name I don't hold and am not looking at: I don't understand the obsession with the recent short-squeeze/corner on the car rental company. I think the ownership dynamics made it kinda cute, but from a market perspective it seemed not terribly spectacular. A big part of it is just optics: a $100 stock going to $700 sounds enormous. But $1 stocks go to $7 on a weekly basis with comparable or higher trading volume and get no coverage. This is a recurring behavioral quirk with stock prices that shows up in lots of contexts. My guess is very few short funds felt real pain here. Short books are much smaller in the post-GME world. Being short at 50bps into a 7x run is anxiety-inducing, but it's a different universe from 100-200bps GME shorts watching 10-20x runs. The tells: borrow rate barely flinched (~10%, nowhere near the 300%+ HTB levels that cause actual squeeze pain), and Markit's real-time short interest rose through the move rather than falling, suggesting shorts were net adding, not getting blown out. If the data's accurate, that's the opposite of a squeeze signature where the shorts capitulate at the top. Maybe this saga isn't over so writing this is too early. Disclosure: No position.

I've received a handful of "where'd you go" DMs. I'm still around and lurking, and I have a lot to say.... But sadly I've got to update a bunch of compliance disclosures and stuff before I can resume posting in any detail about individual securities. Hopefully be back in the next week or two.

Fintel data comes from Interactive Brokers (IBKR). IBKR has realtime lending data that updates as people use the inventory. However, IBKR is showing both their "box" (This is the name for share inventory that is held at the brokerage by other IBKR lending accounts), AS WELL as data contributed by other brokers that they can access "borrow from the street". So an example is IBKR shows 2.5M shares available to borrow on their interface (and fintel grabs that data). That is comprised of: 500k shares from IBKR internal inventory ("the box") 1m shares from some external broker 1m shares from a second external broker. Sometimes intraday, a broker will update their data and say "actually we don't have 1m available to borrow anymore". That could happen for many different reasons, and that is the most likely reason why IBKR would suddenly drop their shares available by a large quantity.

Updating this chart through today. The Y-axis is rescaled and a couple tickers got ----Q'd, but the composition is ~90% the same. What stands out: the index is basically back to where it was in May 2025, despite being up ~50% from April 2025 lows. In other words, if you bought and held the basket of “hyped, low/no earnings story stocks” through the full cycle, you’re roughly flat. But that likely overstates the experience of the typical participant. In practice, people size up as they win and trade more actively as volatility increases. A $10 → $30 → $20 path is not a “+100%” outcome for most traders. By the time it’s back to $20, many are already flat or down once you account for sizing, turnover, and options usage. Layer on the fact that taxes on 2025 gains are coming due shortly for U.S. investors, and there’s a real possibility that a large share of participants who showed peak gains of 50–300% last year are currently underwater on a net basis.

Kevin Mak @KevinLMak

8 months ago

Fun trade/portfolio management thing. Over the past 10 days I've put on a $10M short position in a basket of "trash". My view is that this current run is finally over and I'm willing to call, at least a local if not more enduring, top on it. Note that the Beta of my portfolio

44 2 195 115K 97

Just 6 months ago the dominant narrative was that Single Manager life was dead and Pods were the only option. This article suggests things are starting to move in the other direction?

@blondesnmoney It's economically elegant and socially distasteful. I prefer the former and accept the latter.

@BradGuidry Haven't looked at it, but generally don't follow OTC stuff.

@JaredKubin "These are the [most overfitted] risk models on the planet having a tough time..." FTFY 🤣

@Vanilla_btc That reaction was priced in 🤣

$SPHR Bloomberg article about Nashville Location being considered. Stock +4% in reaction. IMO nothingburger/priced in, they're actively having conversations with 10+ cities, finding out Nashville is one of those 10 doesn't change anything. If it was a signed contract, that would be a different story. From a visibility perspective, this helps convince more people on the sidelines that multi-expansion Sphere is really happening. So it helps the market price get "closer to" fair value, without actually changing fair value.

@angular_thesis If this announcement was "Nashville signs deal to build a Sphere" I'd buy up every share below $120.