look at this guy @Knucc

@Venrae45 @Doowan_ @GhaelWindss Though with their erratas worded similarly enough, I could see it ending up in the direction opposite my initial answer.

0 0 0 38 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

2 months ago

@Venrae45 @Doowan_ @GhaelWindss and if it is finalized after Hook plays the Legion unit, then Legion was not met when the card was played and it wouldn't trigger.

1 0 0 39 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

2 months ago

@Doowan_ @GhaelWindss Of course, assuming the Legion ability is a "When you play me..." and

0 0 0 381 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

2 months ago

@Doowan_ @GhaelWindss -unit with Legion is played, the Legion condition remains unfulfilled and the Legion ability on this unit will not trigger.

1 0 0 394 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

2 months ago

@Doowan_ -the chain, a new round of priority is created. You can play Janna after one of the Rex triggers has resolved to heal the 4 damage from your 5M unit.

0 0 0 180 0

View Details

@Doowan_ Rex and Karthus die. As per the steps of cleanup, Karthus is still present when Rex's Deathknell goes pending, so a pending copy is created. The triggers are placed onto the chain, two separate instances of 4 damage to your 5M unit. Whenever and item resolves and is removed from-

1 0 0 1K 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

2 months ago

@Doowan_ Immortal Phoenix does not care about cost versus effect in regards to a spell. All it requires is that it is in the trash during the resolution of a spell, and that spell deals damage that will be lethal or instructs you to kill a unit outright.

0 0 1 2K 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

3 months ago

@BobbyBarone0 As mentioned already, it only works this way as of March 30th, it's not difficult to remember these changes once you become privy to them but not everyone has a complete breakdown of patch notes that are released semi frequently for a physical card game.

0 0 6 387 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

3 months ago

@manganimist root reference

0 0 0 3K 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

4 months ago

@JumaoSp @TheEtiologist @Js65750134 @NamelessMTG The fact that it's a cast trigger? It only triggers once each time its trigger condition is met

0 0 1 24 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

4 months ago

@ogata_takenari @SCButterMeUp @NovaRiftbound Prior to these rules updates, within the steps for conquering and establishing control after a combat showdown, the Attacker designation (and by extent the Assault bonus) is removed before the battlefield is conquered.

1 0 1 176 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

4 months ago

@MillThat I think this will see play, but I think it was put best when someone said that purple is too modal and efficient, and when purple holds up 2 at EoT (which they often do in Sets 1&2), you have too many cards you could need to play around. This costing 3 is a blessing in disguise.

0 0 0 29 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

4 months ago

@Kuvi_Lor make this green and give Yasuo what he deserves

0 0 1 164 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

4 months ago

@The_UncannyGirl @itsDuulan @Challengertcg It will mostly likely initiate a showdown, and more than 1 Baron cannot score you more than 1 point because Baron only creates Pit if it doesn't already exist. Also, you can score from battlefields regardless of how many other ones you've scored unless it's the victory point.

0 0 0 21 0

View Details

look at this guy @Knucc

4 months ago

@voidyfrown I feel like nobody in these replies is mentioning that there will not be a banlist in set 2, like that particularly is just blatant misinformation