Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

Joined February 2025

Tweets

1K
Followers

213
Following

4K
Likes

7K

Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie

2 hours ago

The House is scheduled to vote this week on a National Defense Authorization that would integrate our military tech & supply chains with Israel’s. Today, the Rules Committee will decide whether my amendment to strip section 219 will get a vote. RT to support the Massie amdt.!

343 5K 12K 125K 197

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

18 hours ago

@its_The_Dr He insider trades like all of them. lol

0 0 2 34 0

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

3 days ago

@SHoomwitter Well Jay Z is literally a demon so yes

0 0 2 701 0

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

3 days ago

@MrRelatable88 lol

0 0 0 25 0

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

4 days ago

@DineshDSouza These people keep making Jews more than Jesus. It's all they care about. Everything is about them. Hallow be HIS name! Let YOU'RE glory show Lord Jesus!

0 0 0 2 0

View Details

The Hormuz Report @HormuzReport

5 days ago

BREAKING: Iran sent a private message to JD Vance during Switzerland talks, warning that Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff were "abusing" negotiations — more interested in profiting from insider knowledge than reaching a deal, per Drop Site News. Iran calculated $9 billion in profits from market manipulation by "individuals close to Trump" — and formally requested $4.5 billion of that sum be allocated to Iran through intermediaries. The Iranian official added: "The exchanged texts will ultimately become part of the historical record." Iran also raised concerns that Kushner and Witkoff "talk almost every day to Netanyahu" and the Mossad chief — feeding Israeli intelligence with inside information from the negotiations. The Trump administration denies the claims. Iran says the evidence will be made public. If confirmed, this is one of the most significant financial scandals in modern diplomacy.

692 11K 43K 1.9M 4K

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

5 days ago

@themichaelowen Yep, they played not to lose and ended up with the L. Play to win, take it to them.

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

6 days ago

@footyinsider247 This is how I know you're a fraud.

0 0 0 11 0

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

7 days ago

@Polymarket Israel tell him this?

0 0 0 11 0

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

a week ago

@Joshpeelfc He scores zero goals in a second league and zero in World Cup.

0 0 1 8 0

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

a week ago

@LFCTransferRoom @el_GOLDIGITAL No, dude never scores goals.

1 0 0 79 0

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

a week ago

@roman_igwebuike Let's GO!!!

0 0 0 46 0

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

a week ago

@SteveOnSpeed Rape

1 0 0 41 0

View Details

Matthew Rosenberg @Learn2ThinkMatt

a week ago

@ViKu1111 Pure gold and further confirmation he's in on it.

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

Vivian Kubrick @ViKu1111

a week ago

Andrew Let me offer advice. Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention. When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction. Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed. That is not a rebuttal. It is containment. Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do. Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not. You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it. That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss. So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat. Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible. You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead. @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @JohnMappin @ImMappin @joekent16jan19 @TRobinsonNewEra @LionelMedia @IanCarrollShow @AwakenWithJP @jimmy_dore @OwenBenjamin @leahfiles @realstewpeters @EstulinVz @RealAlexJones @HarrisonHSmith @BlakeSNeff @TPUSA @DonaldJTrumpJr #TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel

Andrew Kolvet @AndrewKolvet

2 weeks ago

See, your big problem is that this entire thing is not about you, Candace. It’s about Charlie. It’s about Erika. It’s about his kids and his legacy. But time and time again you’ve hijacked Charlie’s story by smearing and slandering his wife, his org, and his friends (and