Ben 🌲 @Lewified

the Truth will set you Free venice.ai/chat?ref=OG1mp4 Private LLMs: Joined April 2013

Tweets

14K
Followers

1K
Following

2K
Likes

98K

David Sacks @DavidSacks

3 days ago

Kimi K3 just fixed 15 critical security bugs that Codex and Fable refused because of “cyber guardrails.” There’s no reason to limit American models on tasks that Chinese models handle without issue. We’re only making ourselves less competitive.

calle @callebtc

4 days ago

I have a report full of security issues of a software I'm working on. Codex won't fix them because of Cyber guardrails Fable won't fix them because of Cyber guardrails Kimi K3 fixed them all. No restrictions, just gets the job done. This will end badly for OpenAI & Anthropic.

268 1K 13K 2.0M 2K

629 2K 21K 2.1M 3K

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

3 days ago

Crazy stat: 0 players have been able to dribble around @cucurella3 in the knockout rounds 🛡️ ⚽️

0 0 0 41 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

3 days ago

saying the quiet part of DC lobbying out loud

Dean W. Ball @deanwball

5 days ago

Some observations on Kimi: 1. It's a very good model! I don't think its performance can be explained away by distillation or anything like that. In agentic coding sessions, it seems pretty much on par with the best public models of Q1 2026. In my fairly limited use, it also

2K 926 8K 11.1M 9K

0 0 0 21 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

7 days ago

x.com/mxavi53467/sta…

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of…

0 0 0 7 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

England’s ⚽️ attack after their first goal

1 0 0 39 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

@GhostofWhitman 👋

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

@JMetz08 @appltrack Local inference of large models like at that point, GLM 7, MiniMax 6, DeepSeek V6, etc

0 0 0 153 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

best photo of the Cup ⚽️

1 0 0 16 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

@ericweinstein Lindsay was old

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

@__donmateo @LogansTwitty @ACChampionship @bakermayfield “our” 😂

0 0 0 14 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

@CorySwan What’s wrong with a business that buys them low (wholesale, bulk) and then sells them in smaller qtys at higher prices?

1 0 0 28 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

@jonatanpallesen mass govt education is one heckuva drug

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

@jfwong they look like ducks, not cobras

0 0 0 11 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

@BillAckman he looks very old

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

a week ago

@WallStreetApes What is wrong with doing this?

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

2 weeks ago

@denverbitcoin good thing gas cars can’t blow up!

1 0 1 385 0

View Details

Ben 🌲 @Lewified

2 weeks ago

@denverbitcoin same as gas tanks

0 0 2 100 0

View Details

Melissa Chen @MsMelChen

2 weeks ago

The US men's national soccer team is being subjected to the same kind of legalized plunder that defines too many divorce proceedings in this country. After grinding through qualifiers, earning their spot in the World Cup, and generating the massive FIFA payout that only the men's game can produce ($12.8 million in this case), the players are now forced to hand over a huge chunk of that money to the women's team under the "equal pay" collective bargaining agreement. The women didn't play a single minute of those matches, didn't draw the crowds, didn't sell the tickets, and didn't create the revenue - yet they still get a cut of the men's prize money while the reverse transfer remains a fraction. Yes the women are more successful (having won the Women's World Cup several times) but the prize is much smaller. Why? It reflects differences in global interest, sponsorship, viewership and actual performance. This is all under the guise of "parity" between "equivalent work." But in reality, it's more like subsidizing one program with the output of the other, just like the ex-spouse cashing checks from earnings she didn't generate. "Equal pay" sounds noble until you realize it erases differences in market value, risk, audience draw, and results. It disincentivizes excellence on the men's side (why push harder if your windfall gets redistributed?) and removes pressure on the women's side to grow their own commercial appeal. Like divorce settlements that trap high-earners in perpetual support roles, this policy treats men's soccer as a piggy bank for "fairness," not a business rewarding what fans and sponsors actually value.