Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

@ReverseRBLX Woah I totally assumed it was going to transfer, that’s ridiculous. Anyone who supported Roblox in its infancy deserves it (let alone the fact that the product itself literally promised lifetime membership….) I’m sure they’ll get sued for this if they don’t follow through

2 2 31 3K 1

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

3 months ago

@r4y319 This is slightly inaccurate if I remember correctly; whoever you had as friends became followers (and people you followed) and whoever you had as best friends became the new friends (which are now connections lol)

3 2 169 10K 8

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

3 months ago

@Rolimons Actually ridiculous they released this before they nailed all the 1:1s, and not only that but the expensive faces should have 1000% been done first. The only good opportunity here is if someone buys YUM and they fix it later they’ll make a ton, but it’s risky

7 0 181 11K 0

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

3 months ago

@superproxgamer It might be you but I’m still thinking 👀👀👀

8 0 57 11K 0

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

3 months ago

Today someone that likes this will get my Dominus Infernus or Domino Crown, the winner can pick tonight 🔥📈

626 80 6K 167K 151

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

4 months ago

Hoping it was an accident or at least a misunderstanding and @Roblox looks at this appeal closely. A massive trader shouldn’t be deleted over accidentally obtaining one small item that was previously stolen or people will lose faith in creating massive collections. Just remove that particular item from the inventory. If it was a consistent trend of him collecting stolen items I’d understand but there needs to be progressive discipline here

6 2 152 10K 6

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

5 months ago

@ottd0 @Roblox I agree, if they are serious they need to do a better job before this feature comes out and make sure there actually is a 1:1 likeness. The static version of the faces should literally be the exact images that are being used now on classic faces

2 2 68 5K 2

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

5 months ago

Small piece of good news / clarification from @roblox posted on the devforum regarding limited faces. That being said, I still find making a dynamic ON/OFF toggle for faces & heads to be the simplest solution and it should have been done from the start..

21 61 1K 45K 145

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

5 months ago

@Roblox devforum link to this reply: devforum.roblox.com/t/completing-t…

2 1 20 11K 3

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

5 months ago

@l77stdbd @Roblox yeah I think a lot of people feel how you do and it makes sense because it's sad. @Roblox should be preserving their history not shredding it, and that's what this feels like. This also goes against previous statements of theirs that they'd always preserve classic items

2 1 114 16K 0

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

5 months ago

hey @Roblox before you cook classic faces, one of your most desirable & memorable features, consider answering this:

97 687 8K 284K 896

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

5 months ago

@LeiS8n @Rolimons @Roblox my honest advice is not to sell any faces you've been holding because 1. decisions can change and 2. panic sales are always an overreaction to news so you lose when the rebound occurs (usually quickly after)

5 0 254 35K 12

View Details

Linkmon99 @Linkmon99

5 months ago

@Bolt_NotReal @Roblox Hard to say, mainly because we don't know how this will impact the sale and trade of these faces since @Roblox didn't explain it - what we do know is there will still be the same amount of super super happy faces, just that they will look different (arguably not as good...)