Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

Almere / Amsterdam Joined March 2009

Tweets

242
Followers

109
Following

820
Likes

6K

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

2 months ago

@robertrioux Don’t let the comments get to you. Everyone can post on X, but most of the negativity is just people trying to lift themselves up by tearing others down. Keep doing what you do — it’s inspiring.

0 0 0 14 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

2 months ago

@robertrioux Hi Robert! Hey, just wanted to say I respect and appreciate you very much. Your incredible work at the major film studios, the stuff you share online, and everything you create is genuinely fantastic.

1 0 0 99 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

2 months ago

@javilopen Hi Javi, Great to hear that Freepik is now called Magnific—especially since the old name could easily cause some unintended confusion in Dutch. Does this also mean that former Freepik customers get access to Mystic 3? I always felt that this, reg aesthetics, came closest to MJ.

0 0 0 25 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

3 months ago

@agustin_prod @freepik Hi Agustin, the test files (blend, obj+ mtl + texture and glb) can be downloaded here: we.tl/t-WBwUryuMb5Ov…

1 0 0 114 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

3 months ago

@StupendousNatur I didn’t know Köln was called Ghent now.

0 0 1 56 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

3 months ago

@freepik Thank you Agustin. Tomorrow I will share them. For the test, I used a simple Suzanne (Blender standard object) with a random texture from my library. What is the best way to share it with you?

0 0 0 29 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

3 months ago

@freepik I did a test and indeed there is an option to upload the mtl and the textures separately. Unfortunately, when chosen, the textures aren’t visible. Am I doing something wrong?

3 0 0 85 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

4 months ago

@javilopen Although it is still in an alpha phase, the quality appears—for now—to have declined significantly. Hands, shapes, and people are often distorted, and what used to look like a photograph now sometimes resembles an oil painting in parts.

0 0 4 458 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

7 months ago

@javilopen Hi Javi, this looks very interesting for photographers. I read that it will also be available on Freepik. If Freepik users will be granted access as well, then I’d be interested in running some tests.

1 0 1 63 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

8 months ago

@freepik This works, thank you!

0 0 1 246 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

8 months ago

@javilopen I got the same result with objects that were in motion. Motion blur still seems to be a challenge.

0 0 0 29 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

8 months ago

@awheintz @javilopen I was initially a bit skeptical, but after some testing, I have to say I got surprisingly good results. The output mainly seems to add extra details rather than changing things — unlike the more creative upscalers (which can also be very useful or necessary at times).

0 0 3 7K 3

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

9 months ago

@javilopen Hi @javilopen, could you tell me a bit more about the settings for these results? I’m trying to sharpen a photo that isn’t completely in focus, but the effect is barely noticeable (Freepik, Magnific v2 Photo).

1 0 0 23 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

10 months ago

@dreamingtulpa

0 0 0 16 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

a year ago

#nieuweprofielfoto

0 0 0 87 0

View Details

Louis van Amerongen @Louisva

a year ago

@freepik That’s great news! However, it’s disappointing to see that only Premium+ members can access this. Will there be an option for Essential members to use this feature as well?