Merrick @MerrickLegal

By law, she did not exist. 🇬🇧 So she rewrote the law. ✍️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 In 1836, a married woman in England could not own, could not sue, could not sign. Even her children were not hers. Her name was Caroline Norton. A poet, and Sheridan's granddaughter. When her marriage collapsed, her husband took their 3 sons and kept every pound sterling she earned by her pen. The law gave a father absolute custody. It left her one thing it could not confiscate. Her voice. Pamphlet by pamphlet, she put the law itself on trial. The Custody of Infants Act 1839. The Matrimonial Causes Act 1857. By 1882, a married woman finally owned what was hers. Her arguments were inside those laws. She wrote, to the Queen: "I do not ask for my rights. I have no rights. I have only wrongs." The law said this woman did not exist. The statute book carries her fingerprints anyway. Britain's freedoms were so often written by the very people denied them. We put their names back, free, for anyone who wants the truth. If you can afford to support our mission: proudofus.co.uk/support Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

If you are separated, making arrangements for your child can feel difficult. New free GOV.UK tools can help you agree practical details like the time children will spend with each parent. Start with the Child Arrangements Planner on GOV.UK. ⬇️

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Watch to find out how we’re piloting a new AI listing assistant for judges to help them make progress on cases that need actioning and to speed up processes. We're working with @HMCTSgovuk to modernise court processes, cut delays and help deliver swifter justice for victims.

Before William Garrow, a criminal trial in England lasted minutes. ⚖️ No lawyer for the accused. The judge asked the questions. Hearsay counted as evidence. Confessions beaten out of people were read aloud in court. If you were poor, you were guilty before you opened your mouth. In 1783, a twenty-three-year-old barrister walked into the Old Bailey. 🏛️ Son of a clergyman. No money. No connections. He chose to defend the poorest people in London. Murderers, thieves, prostitutes, servants accused by their masters. And then he did something no one had ever seen. He fought back. ⚔️ He tore into prosecution witnesses. Exposed lies. Demolished weak evidence. He told the court: you cannot testify to what you heard. Only what you saw. He challenged confessions extracted by violence. He insisted the prosecution must PROVE its case. Judges tried to silence him. He kept going. Prosecutors feared him. The establishment resented him. He won cases that should have been unwinnable. And he kept saying the same thing. Every person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. He didn't invent the idea. It existed in law books. He made it real. In courtroom after courtroom. Case after case. In 1948, "innocent until proven guilty" became Article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 🌍 Every common law country on earth. Britain, America, Canada, Australia, India and more. All use the adversarial system he pioneered. Over 2 billion people live under his legal principles. A clergyman's son from north London. Did they teach you his name? 🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

In case you missed it, we’ve launched our third animated film for #children in #FamilyCourt proceedings. It’s designed to help them feel more confident & comfortable when sharing their wishes, feelings and experiences with their Cafcass worker. Watch now: shorturl.at/dRyOV

It’s a lengthy but this is magnificent from @Geoffrey_Cox on the importance of jury trials. A true orator among giggling simpletons

I’ve written to every Member of Parliament today. Proposals before Parliament would remove jury trials from offences carrying up to three years in prison. Freedoms rarely vanish overnight. They are chipped away in the name of efficiency. Juries did not cause the crisis in our courts. Removing them will not fix it. When the state seeks to take someone’s liberty for serious offences, the judgment of ordinary citizens should never be optional. This is close to becoming law. Please read the letter. Contact your MP now.

PRESS RELEASE: HIGH COURT GRANTS HISTORIC PERMISSION FOR @TMOFCharity The Maggie Oliver Foundation TO CHALLENGE GOVERNMENT ON FAILURE TO ACT ON CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AND EXPLOITATION This morning the High Court granted permission for charity, The Maggie Oliver Foundation, to challenge the Government on its failure to implement the recommendations of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). The judgement is a moment of profound significance for survivors of child sexual abuse and for every child in this country whose safety depends on the Government honouring its commitments to reform. The Court found that following promises from consecutive governments, over the last almost four years, to learn lessons from IICSA to drive improvement in the policy and legislation protecting children, there is a legitimate expectation for them to deliver the inquiry’s twenty recommendations. The judge specifically highlighted the continued permission of use of pain inducing restraint techniques on children, a practice described as amounting to torture by IICSA, as an area where the Government has not justified its failure to act. The case will now proceed to a full substantive hearing. Maggie Oliver (former Detective and founder of the Maggie Oliver Foundation) will say: “Today is a historic day, not just for the Foundation, but for every survivor who has testified, waited and hoped. And it is for every child now and in the future, and for everyone who believes the state’s primary duty is to protect its citizens, especially the most vulnerable. When governments make promises to act and then walk away, children pay the price. Today the court has said, those promises matter.”

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

If you think you’ll never need a jury: think again. I’ve represented: University students, business owners, teachers, prison officers, police officers, local politicians, nurses, mothers, builders & lawyers. Juries aren’t there for other people. They’re a safeguard. For you.

1670, London. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 Two men were arrested for preaching on a street. That was illegal. One of them was William Penn. They were put on trial at the Old Bailey. The judge told the jury to find them guilty. They said not guilty. He sent them back. They came back. Not guilty. He sent them back again. Not guilty. So the judge locked them up. No food. No water. No toilet. For two days. He brought them back into court. Starving. Exhausted. Humiliated. He asked for their verdict. Not guilty. The judge fined every juror. Eleven paid. One didn't. His name was Edward Bushel. He refused to pay. And he sued the judge. He won. The court ruled that no jury can be punished for its verdict. Ever. A jury answers to its conscience — not to the judge. That's still the law. Today. Because one Englishman refused to pay a fine. And twelve more who were starved, locked up, and humiliated. Still said no. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧 Proudofus.co.uk #proudofus

Thrilled to share that Our Dance by @YuenLokling has been longlisted for the #KlausFluggePrize 2026 🏆✨ The first UK picture book about child contact centres - we're proud to be collaborating with Circle & @graffeg_books on this impactful project📚 🔗 bit.ly/46oJ9Pw

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

They were starving. The cotton was right there. They refused to touch it. Lancashire, 1862.🇬🇧 The cotton mills that clothed the world. The cotton came from American slave plantations. Then the Civil War began. Lincoln blockaded the Southern ports. The cotton stopped coming. 331,000 people lost their jobs. The most prosperous workers in Britain were queuing for charity soup. Children went hungry. Everyone expected them to break. Demand the government side with the slaveholders. Get the cotton flowing again. They didn't. New Year's Eve, 1862. Manchester Free Trade Hall. Workers packed the hall. Hungry. Unemployed. Freezing. The Manchester Guardian told them not to come. They came anyway. They voted to support Lincoln. To keep the blockade. To keep starving. They refused to buy their survival with someone else's chains. Lincoln wrote back. He called it "sublime Christian heroism which has not been surpassed in any age or in any country." Then he sent ships full of food to Lancashire. There's still a statue of Lincoln in Manchester. His words are still on it. But here's what most people don't know. That hall, the Free Trade Hall, was built on the exact site of the Peterloo Massacre. In 1819, cavalry charged into working people on that same ground. Demanding the right to vote. At least fifteen killed. Same ground. Same working people. Two generations apart. In 1819 they were cut down for asking to be heard. In 1862 their children chose to starve for someone else's freedom. Lancashire. Every time. Help us get the stories of our ancestors out of the archives and into the people. 👉 proudofus.co.uk/support No sponsors. No ads. Just us. Be part of us. Be proud of us. 🇬🇧

Before this, they decided if you were guilty by making you hold a red-hot iron bar. If you burned, God had spoken. You were guilty. They called it trial by ordeal. It lasted centuries. Then in 1215, on a riverbank in England, they wrote something down that changed the world forever. No free man shall be imprisoned except by the lawful judgement of his peers. Not the king. Not the church. Not a lord. Twelve ordinary people. In 1670, a judge locked up a jury for refusing to convict. Starved them for two days. They still refused. One juror, Edward Bushel, took it to a higher court. And won. From that moment, no judge in England could ever punish a jury for its verdict. Over fifty countries use trial by jury today. All because eight hundred years ago, ordinary people decided that guilt was too important to leave to kings. If you think this should be taught in schools, help us reach more people: proudofus.co.uk/support Be part of us Be Proud Of Us 🇬🇧

Please write to your local MP (again, if appropriate) to voice your concern on the government's plan to restrict jury trials. We’ve updated our template letter for you to send to your local MP with the latest data from the Institute for Government and our response to Part 2 of Sir Brian Leveson’s report. Download the letter and find your MP⬇️ bit.ly/4bKjRPs

I have heard similar stories to this by @Gabriel_Pogrund of fraud on the Land Registry and the Probate Registry, of stealing title to an elderly man’s home and forging a will and probate in his lifetime. If you own property, set up a Land Registry alert thetimes.com/uk/crime/artic…

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

We are pleased to acknowledge the start of @FamMedCouncil's #FamilyMediationWeek to improve awareness of mediation processes. Find out more about how mediation can benefit children and families facing separation on our website: shorturl.at/1zabV #FamilyJustice

With the Law on Our Side: How the Law Works for Everyone and How We Can Make It Work Better, new book by Lady Hale reviewed in The Observer today. We hear you, my Lady, with plans for our next initiative already well advanced! #lawforgood #AccessToJustice #FamilyLaw

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Wishing you an egg-cellant Easter Sunday!

Next week’s TV includes this on Tuesday night #legaladvice #criminaldefence #RepresentationMatters

Just an African cheetah family posing for a family portrait in the golden-hour glow.