MJerky32 @Mjerky32

@aiyukisfree @OurSf49ers "I formally request reinstatement from the reserve/left squad list to active status," accompanied by the player's signature and identifier details. And he’s freed Does he even know that? lol

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

Underdog @Underdog

2 months ago

💰 BONUS CASH GIVEAWAY 💰 We're adding money to the pot for UFC 329: McGregor win by KO +$2000 McGregor win by TKO +$1000 McGregor win by decision +$500 10 followers will split the final prize pool. To enter, just 1️⃣ Follow us @Underdog 2️⃣ Repost this

123 1K 547 58K 13

View Details

Underdog @Underdog

2 months ago

💰 BONUS CASH GIVEAWAY 💰 We're adding $1,000 to the pot every time a Switzerland goal is overturned by VAR against Argentina tomorrow. 10 followers will split the final prize pool. To enter, just 1️⃣ Follow us @Underdog 2️⃣ Repost this

113 780 502 52K 8

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@DKSports @DraftKings 1A

0 0 0 23 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@Underdog 🇺🇸

0 0 0 5 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@anammostarac That is wrong VAR didnt overturn it Matanović’s touch establishes that Pašalić was in an offside position- that alone isn’t yet an offside offense. Veiga’s contact is what decides it: deliberate → onside, no offense = goal Non-deliberate/incidental → the offside stand

1 0 0 143 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@hughiemachrins @roscoe_p_ny @TedBuddy8 Subjective call to overturn a goal? lol

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@chiesadinho @calcioxtra Renato Veiga bent down & headed it the microchip proved a Croatian player touched it = irrelevant the ref ruled ***Veiga's header as a split-second reflex reaction to a deflection rather than a deliberate play Are you saying the Veiga header was accidental?

0 0 0 19 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@SKantekar @markvalorian Renato Veiga bent down & headed it the microchip proved a Croatian player touched it- irrelevant the ref ruled Veiga's header as a split-sec reflex reaction to a deflection rather than a deliberate play This is the debate- most eyes say it was a deliberate play & goal counts

0 0 1 59 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@CanadasLeafs The entire legal debate hinges on Renato Veiga's header, yet the public conversation remains completely distracted by the sensor data from the Croatian player. You do realize he is not offside if they ruled the Portugal header was not incidental?

0 0 0 48 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@Primo__Verde @pisto_gol The touch does not make it offsides Are you saying Veiga’s header was unintentional because if it was deliberate, that makes Pašalić onside and Matanović’s touch doesn’t matter. Which is it?

0 0 0 19 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@ZwebackHD Are you saying Veiga’s header was unintentional because if it was deliberate, that makes Pašalić onside and Matanović’s touch doesn’t matter.

0 0 0 27 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@v_gaaX @ReadMe1Tab @l3d1c Are you saying Veiga’s header was unintentional because if it was deliberate, that makes Pašalić onside and Matanović’s touch doesn’t matter. Which is it?

1 0 0 36 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@v_gaaX @ReadMe1Tab @l3d1c Your not making sense His hair did touch it that didnt create the offsides Why are you not understanding the ruling?

0 0 0 22 0

View Details

MJerky32 @Mjerky32

2 months ago

@v_gaaX @ReadMe1Tab @l3d1c If Veiga’s contact was a deliberate header, not just an incidental deflection off his body, that makes Pašalić onside, and Matanović’s touch is irrelevant. Veiga’s contact being treated as incidental/deflection, not a deliberate play- insane to say this was clear offsides