ModelDrift @ModelDrift

@sudoingX What's the different between VS Studio + Claude vs Cursor? Is there anything life-changing that the VS Studio + Claude doesn't do in a way that's comparable to Cursor??

@Teknium OK, but what kind of hairstyle can your CEO get away with?

@willdepue Very interesting. @willdepueplease fFollow me so we can converse in the future. I have been working with a project I dubbed "Machine Readable Me." I'm an far behind you in implementing the concept, but I find it very interesting.

@sudoingX Include Mac as well. A lot of people are starting their local LLM journey on a Mac. That's your intake funnel.

@ileppane @0xMovez Thank you. I hate YouTube embeds.

@stevencasteelX @slash1sol Thank you. I have no use for collecting X videos, they are a very poor substitute for the YouTube originals. It annoys the f out of me that we don't get the link to the original. Thanks for doing the right thing.

That's interesting. In the begining were word, words begat reasoning, reasoning begat concepts and emotions... I keep hearing pundits say that LLMs are a dead end, but it seems to be more of a building block for higher order thinking and even, possibly, consciousness?

TFTC @TFTC21

a month ago

Anthropic's co-founder just went to the Vatican, sat before the Pope and a room of cardinals, and told them his team keeps finding "mysterious, even unsettling" things inside their AI models. What he's referencing: Anthropic published research in April showing that Claude

1K 4K 13K 2.3M 8K

@ai_with_wy @DanielMiessler linkedin.com/in/cytoyue

I didn't know I needed a robot until today.

The Humanoid Hub @TheHumanoidHub

2 months ago

Atlas hauling a 50 lb mini-fridge - Practiced the maneuver for millions of hours in a virtual environment. - Focused the training policy on full-body engagement rather than just hand-grasping, allowing the robot to leverage its entire frame for the lift.

53 278 2K 112K 397

Ilya Sutskever just told the AI industry why scaling is finished. One word built it. One word is about to break it. Sutskever: “Scaling is just one word, but it’s such a powerful word because it informs people what to do.” For five years, that single word replaced an entire research culture. Nobody needed breakthroughs. They needed bigger checks. Sutskever: “If you mix some compute with some data into a neural net of a certain size, you will get results, and you will know that it will be better if you just scale the recipe up.” That’s not science. That’s a recipe. Sutskever: “Companies love this because it gives you a very low risk way of investing your resources.” The most transformative technology in human history ran on the same logic used to franchise a restaurant chain. More locations. More ingredients. Same recipe. Predictable returns. You didn’t need researchers who could see around corners. You needed accountants who could approve purchase orders. But recipes expire. Sutskever: “At some point though, pre-training will run out of data. The data is very clearly finite.” Five years of infrastructure. Five years of hiring. Five years of investor decks. All built on top of something temporary. Sutskever: “I don’t think that’s true.” The co-founder of OpenAI. The mind behind the breakthroughs that made this entire era possible. Saying more money won’t solve it. Sutskever: “In some sense we are back to the age of research.” Most of the companies racing to build AGI were never research companies. They were scaling companies. They hired for execution. Not discovery. They optimized for throughput. Not insight. The talent pipelines. The investor pitches. The board decks. All built around one assumption. That the recipe would never expire. It’s expiring. And the companies that spent five years perfecting the art of spending money are about to discover something. The next era demands what capital can’t purchase. An original idea.

Some people's minds are on a completely different level, like @poetengineer__. I want to be like her when I grow up. Her Patreon project page: patreon.com/posts/touchdes…

Kat ⊷ the Poet Engineer @poetengineer__

2 months ago

trying to use topological data analysis to map the shape of my x bookmarks through mapper + embedding extraction and generated 3 views: - density: where attention

138 639 6K 773K 5K

Seedance 2 has entered its Chuck Norris era (from u/orichalchem) --- reddit. com/r/aivideo/comments/1sh5gt6/the_almighty_chuck_norris/

I'm sorry, but I've seen this and now you must see this as well. H/t @Presidentlin

It was my fault. I started talking Orbital Physics with ChatGPT. But ChatGPT had a closing shot that had me giggling out loud... Me: "Being an orbital physicist must be really boring." ChatGPT: "At times, probably yes. A lot of it is: “Relative to what?” “Which frame?” “Is that velocity, radial velocity, or delta-v?” “Congratulations, your intuition is wrong again.” Spaceflight is one of those fields where reality refuses to be user-friendly. That said, the non-boring part is that these people can take what looks like abstract mathematical punishment and use it to fling humans around the Moon and bring them back alive. That is a pretty decent party trick. So: boring in the day-to-day details, deeply cool in the aggregate. Like accounting, but with fire and vacuum."

Very interesting. Cognition is the new Context. Or Prompt? It's part of the next big thing. After my coffee kicks in, I now have something to play with.

CMEM.ai @Claude_Memory

3 months ago

x.com/i/article/2042…

0 7 50 18K 78

x.com/i/article/2042…

The post gives some really good insights as a context for the article accompanying it. Read the post before jumping into the article. Or just read the post. Or the article. Or get another coffee. Do whatever makes you happy.

Akshay 🚀 @akshay_pachaar

3 months ago

What does every big company think about the agent harness? Anthropic, OpenAI, CrewAI, LangChain. They all build agents. They all wrap their models in infrastructure to make them useful. They each call it the harness. But they agree on one thing. And disagree on everything else.

67 179 1K 182K 2K

Oh, I've so been waiting for this. The command line is useful, but planning is not where it shines. Drafting a plan at the command line is better left to Lisp programmers, EMACS zealots and guys with neck beards. (Which as often the same thing...)

Thariq @trq212

3 months ago

New in Claude Code: /ultraplan Claude builds an implementation plan for you on the web. You can read it and edit it, then run the plan on the web or back in your terminal. Available now in preview for all users with CC on the web enabled.

534 650 10K 1.3M 6K