Kayla Rae @MsKaylaRae

It was really cool to get a DM from a well respected former judge who wants the public to understand the role of a judge in a way that can get lost in some of these trials… including Karen Read x2

Carol Erskine @TheCarolErskine

a year ago

My thanks to so many of you for encouraging me to speak out! Very excited to spend some time with Peter Tragos on "Lawyer You Know" next Thursday June 26th at 10 AM. Hope you will join us.

144 146 2K 105K 59

60 95 2K 63K 35

View Details

David Yannetti @BostonDefender

a year ago

@Bederowlaw Word.

172 104 5K 167K 24

View Details

Lawyer You Know @LawyerYouKnow

a year ago

Wait what???

Karen Read Updates @kreadisinnocent

a year ago

PROCTOR SPEAKS OUT FOR THE FIRST TIME TONIGHT ON ABC 20/20.

541 225 2K 1.2M 429

585 166 3K 326K 219

View Details

Kayla Rae @MsKaylaRae

a year ago

@LawyerYouKnow Holy shit

0 0 1 393 0

View Details

Law&Crime Network @LawCrimeNetwork

a year ago

A jury found Karen Read not guilty of second-degree murder in the death of her then Boston cop boyfriend, John O’Keefe. But received a guilty verdict for operating under the influence of alcohol. The jury deliberated for about 20 hours.

80 188 2K 148K 116

View Details

Karen Read Updates @kreadisinnocent

a year ago

NOTTTTTTTTT GUILTYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!! HOWS EVERYONE FEELING???????

208 117 3K 93K 10

View Details

Karen Read Updates @kreadisinnocent

a year ago

Not. Guilty.

38 61 1K 95K 23

View Details

Lawyer You Know @LawyerYouKnow

a year ago

It’s a real shocker the jury is confused with count 2 lesser includeds

Ted Daniel @TedDanielnews

a year ago

The jury's 3rd question is related to "charge 2". This is what the note said: "does convicting guilty on a sub-charge, example offense 2 number 5, convict the overall charge?" Lawyers meeting privately to discuss the responses they want to give to jury. Everyone is due back

29 16 169 189K 11

83 59 1K 130K 21

View Details

Bederow Law @Bederowlaw

a year ago

to the surprise of absolutely nobody, the jury appears confused on count 2 and the lesser includeds, most notably the OUI. It does appear the jury is entirely focused on the OUI based on all 3 questions, which seems to be a very bad sign for the prosecution. However, the inclusion of the OUI does seem to be making at least one juror consider that off-ramp rather than a full-blown acquittal. All in all, didn't sound great for a conviction on any of the homicide-related charges.