liv @OLangell

@SWAGaming4184 @jerseyh0mo @NigarPatti9130 @TheMapleLass @GemmaNoiosi So kids chose childhood cancer? I chose to have a brain tumor at 14? Children choose to be abused? Women choose to be beat by their husbands/boyfriends? Babies choose genetic/congenital disorders? Boy am I excited for whatever answer you are going to come up with.

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@youngbl17183080 @13moonshinee @NigarPatti9130 @jerseyh0mo @TheMapleLass @GemmaNoiosi Awww you thought you ate with this! Wake up idiot. Yall all worship the same God. Jews, Muslims and Christian’s alike. They all worship the God of Abraham.

1 0 2 26 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@iowagolddsm @OrevaZSN the ratification argument is a legal theory, not an established fact. every branch of government has treated the 14th amendment as valid law for over 150 years, even if you disagree with how it’s been interpreted.

0 0 0 21 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@iowagolddsm @OrevaZSN whether the 14th amendment was properly interpreted is a fair debate. Claiming courts adopted that interpretation to “import voters” is a separate claim that requires evidence. You are jumping from constitutional interpretation to a political motive claim.

1 0 0 23 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@iowagolddsm @OrevaZSN then we’re back to interpretation, not ratification. “The courts interpreted it wrong” and “the amendment isn’t law” are two different arguments

1 0 0 27 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@iowagolddsm @OrevaZSN but earlier you said you don’t believe in judicial supremacy so the point I just made surely won’t mean anything to you.

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@iowagolddsm @OrevaZSN thats Adams, not Madison. and you’re answering why you oppose Islam, not what constitutional principle would prevent a state majority from establishing it

1 0 0 18 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@iowagolddsm @OrevaZSN The actual disagreement here is that you reject the 14th amendment.

1 0 0 18 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@iowagolddsm @OrevaZSN congress. so your answer is yes—a state could establish Islam if the majority wanted it. that’s the logical consequence of your position.

1 0 0 15 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@iowagolddsm @OrevaZSN I find you only like this theory when it supports christian outcomes. do you still like it when it doesn’t ?

1 0 0 18 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@iowagolddsm @OrevaZSN So if georgia established christianity , utah established mormonism, and another state established islam, you’d consider all of those constitutional?

1 0 0 22 0

View Details

liv @OLangell

a month ago

@iowagolddsm @OrevaZSN Georgia using God in their preamble is vastly different than forcing me to attend church every Sunday, is that your point? That states are allowed to use religious language in legal work?