Zano @OTLSZano

Fantasy Football tragic and family man. Joined December 2013

Tweets

4K
Followers

319
Following

516
Likes

4K

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@hasumpstuffedup Come on now. That’s a clear holding the ball. Had a chance to try and dispose of it. Didn’t even try. Fair tackle. Holding the ball. As an umpire coach if I saw this let go I’d reef the umpire. This is as clear a HTB as it gets.

0 0 2 184 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@DEBOCODEB @hasumpstuffedup So by saying the impact was incidental would mean you are saying there was contact. Therefore by your own theory it must be a free kick. Accidental or not is irrelevant.

0 0 0 17 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@hasumpstuffedup He was clearly ahead of the mark so technically it’s a 50m penalty. However a quick warning from the ump to come back wouldn’t go astray. Then if he doesn’t different story.

0 0 0 77 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@Chardy53102203 @itsjackknight @hasumpstuffedup Not talking about the undoing. That’s too late. Watch the replay. Shiel leaves the ground first making that the 75th. The question is about using the injured player rule. But that can only be used if you need a 76th. Shiel was already on the bench.

1 0 0 59 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@will_guy @hasumpstuffedup Play is stopped at the first break in play and free kick taken from there.

0 0 0 187 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@itsjackknight @hasumpstuffedup Shiel came off first making him the 75th. Then the other player came off after, who wasn’t hurt or injured, making it the 76th. So sadly the rule doesn’t refer to the 75th change, only the 76th or after.

1 0 0 97 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@jasic11967423 @hasumpstuffedup @UmpireFanatic @UmpireAFL I’ll wait for you to show me where any of that is in the law book.

1 0 1 28 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@thefrontbar7 Kouta vs the entire Essendon team in the last quarter of the ‘99 prelim.

2 0 5 1K 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@hasumpstuffedup @UmpireFanatic @UmpireAFL This is a very old view of the current model. In the old 3 and 2 umpire system you would be correct. However in the new 4 umpire system this is not only encouraged it is expected. It’s the exact reason why it was brought in. Umpire 1 was unable to get a clear view. Ump 2 did.

0 0 1 106 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@hasumpstuffedup Not acceptable at any level.

0 0 2 726 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@hasumpstuffedup How can he break the tackle if he’s not tackled to start with? You’ve actually proven he was tackled by breaking the tackle 🤷‍♂️

0 0 0 67 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@JoelSweet20 @hasumpstuffedup Came in as a part of the stand rule.

0 0 1 22 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@stellacats1528 @FreoPope @Eden_Richards @hasumpstuffedup @vegetablesgooff Because it came in with the stand rule. Prior to that there was no 5m protected zone behind the mark. Stand rule came in well after 2018.

1 0 0 64 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@heath_buck I love the kid. But he’s not even top 5.

0 0 1 118 0

View Details

Zano @OTLSZano

3 years ago

@TynecastleP @vcg47 @jrcphotographic @Adelaide_FC No. The signal is just to acknowledge the umpire has heard the siren. The game ends when any field umpire hears the siren. The signal is irrelevant based on timing. Has no bearing on when the game actually ends.