Bruce Pardy @PardyBruce

@Shawnbuckleylaw calls it “the shakening” he, @PardyBruce and Leighton Grey are talking about it in a few minutes. nhppa.org Go to the three bars, select media, live media, in 6 minutes.

Congratulations to Let Alberta Decide, who has raised over $120,000, in their first week, and Pathway to Independence, who has raised over $70,000, in the first month of the referendum campaign. Those are incredible numbers — and they show something very important: Albertans are engaged. Albertans care. Albertans want their voices heard. We are also pleased to announce that The Lavigne Show TPA is closing in on $20,000 raised. Because of your support, we have already been able to: ✅ Print 2,000 lawn signs ✅ Power 3 billboards around the Alberta Legislature ✅ Organize a 3-day public input tour with Bruce Pardy, Dennis Kalma, and Matthew Rowley And we are just getting started. There are still 3.5 months left in this campaign, and we need to reach as many Albertans as possible before October 19th. Our goal is to raise $100,000 to fund more signs, more advertising, more events, and more outreach across Alberta. Every contribution helps. Every lawn sign matters. Every conversation moves this forward. Please contribute today: TheLavigneShow.com/tpa Together, we can do this. @LetABDecide @CoryBMorgan @PardyBruce @DennisKalma @mrowley1987

Who really controls your land? What rights do landowners have? And what can Canadians do to protect them? Join the conversation this afternoon with NHPPA President Shawn Buckley, constitutional lawyer Leighton Grey, and law professor Bruce Pardy. 📅 Saturday, June 27 🕧 12:30 PM MT / 2:30 PM ET 📍 Onoway Community Hall, Onoway, Alberta (Admission by donation) 📺 Watch live at nhppa.org/live

Tomorrow: Who Really Controls Your Land? If you're a farmer, rural landowner, or simply concerned about the future of property rights in Canada, this is a conversation you won't want to miss. Join constitutional lawyer and NHPPA President Shawn Buckley, renowned constitutional lawyer Leighton Grey, and law professor Bruce Pardy for an afternoon exploring the legal realities surrounding property rights, land use, and constitutional authority in Canada. How are current and emerging policies affecting agricultural land? What rights do landowners have? And what can Canadians do to protect them? 📅 Saturday, June 27 🕧 12:30 PM MT / 2:30 PM ET 📍 Onoway Community Hall, Onoway, Alberta (Admission by donation) 📺 Watch live anywhere at nhppa.org/live Your land is more than property... It's your livelihood. Your legacy. Your freedom. Join the conversation. #NHPPA #PropertyRights #Farmers #LandRights #FoodFreedom #RuleOfLaw #Canada

Welcome to Canada’s New Blasphemy Regime Bruce Pardy saw this coming. Bill C-9 “criminalizes an emotion.” Prof. @PardyBruce warned us: C-9 defines hatred as “detestation or vilification” — stronger than mere “dislike.” Who draws that line? The authorities. Wherever they want. To punish speech the government dislikes. This isn’t about stopping real threats (already illegal). It’s about shielding one set of religious practices from ordinary pushback. Freedom of speech exists to criticize power — including religious power. When that’s gone, everything else follows. rairfoundation.com/welcome-canada… #BillC9 #FreeSpeech

They torpedoed the AB independence movement, they are backdooring censorship through the courts (@nulamoonsnail, @VoteCanadaCom) & they are introducing tyrannical bills. They are playing with people who can no longer afford to play @jasonjamesbnn @PardyBruce

c4sif.org/2026/06/bylund… @PerBylund

Mises Media @mises_media

2 days ago

The argument for intellectual property—that nobody would invest in uncertain ideas without legal protection—applies to all entrepreneurship. Every business is an investment in something of uncertain value. It doesn't stop entrepreneurs. It never has. @PerBylund

1 6 22 5K 5

🚨 Bill C-34 isn’t just another law — it’s the blueprint for Canada’s managerial state. 🚨 Professor Bruce Pardy breaks it down: Bill C-34 creates a powerful unelected Digital Safety Commission with sweeping authority to decide later what counts as “harmful content,” who gets banned, how AI must behave, what platforms must censor, and how to “protect kids” — all with hazy definitions pulled straight from controversial hate speech expansions. This is how Canada now governs — Parliament passes vague frameworks, then unelected commissions fill in the blanks in back rooms. Elections and courts won’t fix the structural disease. Only a fundamental shift in how we design government can. This conversation with @RealNicoLagan and @PardyBruce is one of the clearest, most chilling explanations of where this is all heading. ➡️ WATCH HERE: youtube.com/watch?v=2InSkT… #BillC34 #DigitalSafetyAct #FreeSpeech #CanadaPolitics #Censorship

Canada’s property system is built on ONE thing… and it’s breaking. Law professor Bruce Pardy explains why uncertainty over land title could ripple through the entire economy. Watch the full episode on YouTube. youtu.be/3i6q4je22-A @FrontierCentre @PardyBruce

Most Canadians are focused on Bill C-34. Before that it was Bill C-22. Before that it was Bill C-9. And that is exactly the problem. Professor of Law at Queen's University @PardyBruce just explained why fighting each bill one by one will never fix Canada. The bills are not the problem. They are the distraction. The real problem is the system that keeps producing them — a governing structure that allows elected politicians to hand unlimited power to unelected bureaucrats who answer to no one and serve indefinitely. Until Canadians understand that, nothing changes. Watch the full conversation here 👇

@PardyBruce hits the nail on the head. We either support @ABDanielleSmith, or we support an independent Alberta. Can't do both.

Ron Voss @RonVoss5

3 days ago

An Interview with Bruce Pardy that Many in the Independence Movement Would Probably Rather Not Watch According to Bruce’s straight up analysis of the current situation: “The bottom line is that independence is probably not going to happen with the present provincial leadership

18 46 83 8K 15

Dr. @PardyBruce is correct. More people are accepting this truth: You can either have @ABDanielleSmith as the Premier; or you can have a fair question on a ballot for Independence, but you can't have both. She has her thumb and her ass on the scale and she isn't hiding it!

Ron Voss @RonVoss5

3 days ago

An Interview with Bruce Pardy that Many in the Independence Movement Would Probably Rather Not Watch According to Bruce’s straight up analysis of the current situation: “The bottom line is that independence is probably not going to happen with the present provincial leadership

18 46 83 8K 15

An Interview with Bruce Pardy that Many in the Independence Movement Would Probably Rather Not Watch According to Bruce’s straight up analysis of the current situation: “The bottom line is that independence is probably not going to happen with the present provincial leadership that you have. Because they don’t want it and they are telling us all explicitly that they don’t want it and they will prevent it…You are being led down the garden path.” “She has declared her colours and the question…is for those independence supporters, who support her…are you going to continue to support two things? Because those two things are now in conflict. The two things are independence or Danielle Smith leadership. If you insist bought those things must stay, you have decided Alberta will not become independent.” youtube.com/watch?v=msLgZ3…

Bill C-34 may be the bill everyone is talking about. But according to Professor @PardyBruce, it is not the real problem but It only a symptom. In this episode, Bruce Pardy joins Nico Lagan to discuss Bill C-34, the Digital Safety Act, the proposed Digital Safety Commission of Canada, and the much bigger system behind it. What started as a conversation about online safety, harmful content, age verification and internet regulation quickly became a much deeper discussion about unelected commissions, delegated authority, bureaucratic power, the managerial state, COVID, censorship, Alberta independence, and whether Canadians are fighting the wrong battle. Because the real issue is not the one bill. The real issue is the system that keeps producing them. Watch the full conversation 👇youtube.com/live/2InSkTdDz…

🔥 What if our constitutions got it completely backwards? Instead of starting with “government exists for the common good / general welfare” (aka unlimited power with a few polite exceptions), what if we flipped it? Government should be powerless… EXCEPT for: ✅ Resolve disputes ✅ Protect the country’s borders and security ✅ Anything not on the list - Not their job. Full stop. @PardyBruce nailed it: We have to design constitutions assuming the people running the state will eventually be the wrong people — ambitious, self-interested, or just mediocre. Not saints. Not visionaries. So give them almost nothing to work with. #LimitedGovernment #Constitution #Liberty @TheLavigneShow with guests Bruce Pardy, Dennis Kalma, & Matthew Rowley: youtube.com/live/k_VAv-gJA…

For decades, governments controlled what Canadians saw and heard through television and radio. Then the internet changed everything. According to law professor @PardyBruce , Bill C-34 is part of an effort to bring that control back. Watch the full conversation: 👇

No Independence Without Revolution w/ Bruce Pardy and Brave New Normal host @jasonjamesbnn The 10th question on the Oct. 19 provincial referendum is a double-barreled trap favoring the status quo.  Liberation requires rejecting the trap entirely and embracing the disruption inherent in breaking from a dysfunctional federation. Without that mindset shift, says Professor Pardy, the status quo persists.  If you want change, “you want disruption because you know the situation that you’re in is not working. If your objective is to keep things mostly the same, then what is the point of this?” ~@PardyBruce What does that mean for Alberta independence?  No political saviors. Success historically comes from organized, persistent citizen action that forces or replaces reluctant elites, not hoping current ones will deliver despite their statements and actions. Albertans must shed Canadian risk-aversion and preference for middle-ground “naive” federalism.  Can Albertans unpack the Canada they carry in their psyches in order to pack up and leave? The discussion lives here: youtube.com/watch?v=msLgZ3…

@dman0067 @Speaking4m @echipiuk Yes, the CHA is federal. But healthcare is under provincial jurisdiction. Alberta is bound by the CHA only because it takes federal money. The CHA is the condition of the bribe. Alberta can run its healthcare system any way it wants to. Instead, it chooses to take the bribe.

@originalkmiller @Speaking4m @echipiuk Alberta could reform its healthcare system any way it wishes. Healthcare is under provincial jurisdiction. The CHA binds Alberta only if it takes federal money. The money is a bribe. Provinces that take the money must abide by federal conditions, like the CHA.

Out Now! ⤵️ youtube.com/watch?v=msLgZ3… @PardyBruce in conversation with @jasonjamesbnn

Jason James @jasonjamesbnn

4 days ago

No Independence Without Revolution w/ Bruce Pardy Right here in full tomorrow at 9am EST. See you then.

2 12 30 2K 1