peter hotrum @Photrum

@mitchellvii Aged like a gallon of milk

@cybrtrkguy I barely lost to a motorcycle one time and immediately regretted not getting the beast.

Modern Christians have a poor working knowledge of historic heresies and how popular they were in their heyday. Polemics Santa can testify to that. Arianism dominated much of the European empire and most Germanic tribes for about 250 years, and for a while, seemed destined to win. Pelagianism boomed in its heyday and dominated much of Christendom for about 200 years, continuing to resurrect itself in parts of Europe every few centuries. Monophysitism lasted for 200 years. Monothelitism lasted about 150. Montanism - the original hyper/proto-charismaticism - lasted 200 years. Donatism lasted for a whopping 300 years in North Africa, before the advance of Islam. The Social Gospel of Rauschenbusch ruled the church for 60 years before dying out, only to be reborn recently. British Israelism, pre-dating Hebrew Roots, lasted for 70 years in the UK. Liberal Protestantism has lasted about 120 years, and is on its deathbed and will be gone in our lifetime, losing momentum exponentially every decade as fag and female pastors spend the last remaining savings from a bygone era preaching to empty buildings, selling off properties to pay their salaries just a few more years until it all dries up. We laugh now at some of these. But for a minute, they all seemed like dominant and unbeatable movements sure to squash the historic church. For a while, they seemed to meld the minds of Christians everywhere. But in the end, they had an expiration date that was waiting. So, what happened? Why do none of them last? When doctrinal novelties are invented, they all solve a supposed problem, answer a difficult question, or serve a specific purpose. That causes what Luther referred to as "enthusiasm," as whatever that need is appears to be fulfilled by the doctrines espoused. And it's really hard to get through to people amidst that enthusiasm. They aren't interested in debate. They're interested in pitching their product and selling the novelty - and the Christian public is easy to buy it. Every heresy begins by scratching an itch. It offers a cleaner answer, a more exciting prophecy chart, a more spiritual experience, a less offensive gospel, a better explanation, or a way to baptize the spirit of the age. That's why it spreads so quickly. It isn't competing against orthodoxy on the merits. It's competing by promising to satisfy an immediate desire. And then, each heresy gets a marketing campaign. "The Church has missed this for two thousand years." "We've finally recovered the truth." "This changes everything." The first generation buys it because it's new. The second inherits it. The third starts asking uncomfortable questions. By the fourth, it's either become orthodoxy because it was biblical all along, or it's sitting in the museum beside Arianism, Pelagianism, Montanism, and every other theological miracle cure that couldn't survive prolonged exposure to Scripture. Error burns hot. Truth burns long. That's why orthodoxy always looks old. It is. It's what was left after the fire burned everything else away. Over time, error has to sell itself. Truth just has to endure. That's why Dispensationalism is dying. Right in front of us. All the protest you see right now is "much a'do about nothing." This heresy - unlike those others - is even propped up by hundreds of millions each year by an entire nation's propaganda budget and the most sophisticated religious interference campaign in human history. No other heresy has had a body-politic from a different religion spend fortunes trying to spread sub-Christian doctrines before. And despite that, Dispensationalism is still wheezing its last breaths on the deathbed. Dispensationalists largely aren't even willing to debate their positions. When they attempt on rare occasion, like Dinesh D'Souza, they get crushed. Instead, Dispensationalists just scream their bumpersticker slogans into their online echo-chambers and condemn historic orthodoxy with scary labels. One-on-One, verse-by-verse contests of Biblical disputation? Lol, no. They don't do that. And people notice. They notice when one side is making sense, preaching sermons and tackling the open Bible, and the other side is throwing out "Jesus was a Jew" tweets and blaming the Holocaust on historic Christianity. Where are the replays of the Dinesh debate? Why aren't they instantly replaying that? Why do most Dispies tweet but refuse debate? It's because their perspectives can't withstand scrutiny; that's why. It's unserious. Dispensationalism is the cartoon of heresies. There is no Arius of Dispensationalism, debaters who seriously propose and defend their position in scholarly Scriptural debate. They don't because they can't. The more Dispensationalists *try* to debate, the more Covenant Theologians they make. The vast sum of Dispensationalists you know were born Dispies, raised in Dispie churches, listen to Dispie pastors, and were brought up believing Dispensationalism was the status quo of Christianity, that it is the default position of the church. They don't know any better. They hold to Dispensationalism because, for them, it is the de facto position. But nobody becomes a Dispensationalist because they heard a debate, listened to both sides, and walked away converted. Dispensationalism is an impossible uphill climb because they can't make new converts by conversion. They have to be born. They have to be raised in it. It's not an intellectual position; it's an eschatological presupposition. But Covenant Theologians are making converts of Dispies every day, all day long. I've had hundreds, if not thousands, of "converts" who were raised Dispie, then did the studying, listened to the matter laid out over the open Bible, and have walked away as Covenant Theologians. Their converts must be born and indoctrinated. Ours can be born and/or converted, both. And the conversions come relatively easily, on account of Dispensationalism being such a Biblically untenable, convoluted position to begin with. God promised to preserve His church. Truth, ultimately, will survive the testing of fire and come out better than it went in. And soon, in 20-30 years, Dispensationalism will fill the ashheap of history with every other dumb, sub-Christian idea that has been crushed beneath the truth of God's Word. The Church survived roughly 1800 years before John Nelson Darby thought up the hair-brained ideas that Jews remain in God's Covenant despite being outside of Christ while in a convalescent bed in Ireland. It took a half-century of ceaseless prophecy charts and an uncontrollable prophecy fetish and world tours of getting Christians to look at the Bible like a Magic Eye poster before the idea got any steam at all. A Restorationist cult, nearly already dead by 1900, got a shot of adrenaline and a new lease on life when Zionists at Oxford put it into a Bible with marginal notes and spread it throughout the world, where pastors, mostly without any formal Bible instruction, took it as the Word of God instead of the rantings of a heretic, and the rest is history. But before many of us are dead, you'll find the majority of the Christian church looking back and wondering how anyone was dumb enough to believe it. Now, the cat is out of the bag. Books like Hyphenated Heresy and Substacks like Insight to Incite and thousands of Christians who are tired of acting like it's not the dumbest, most Scripturally illiterate position they've ever heard are making quick work of its refutation. And mark my words; there is no turning back. Christians have seen the Emperor. He is naked. And he is dumb. And we are saying so.

People on the Right cant get along because they’re all operating from different stages of grief. Bargaining looks like collaboration to one still in Denial, Acceptance like treason to those still working through Anger. And no one likes the Depressed.

@rightsofrefusal I need this shirt

@afbranco Islam is the broom of Judaism. Israelis wield the broom.

@SpillTheMemes What about coke from a plastic bag?

@RT_on_X Kiev is just the puppet regime. The globalist MIC warmongers strategy didnt fail it effectively consumed most of the world's weapons and produced a restocking order for at least a decade if not more. It did underestimate Russia however.

Four step solution to the pit bull problem: 1) Ban the breeding, sale, or adoption of pit bulls 2) Kill all pit bulls currently in shelters 3) Mandate immediate euthanizing of any privately owned pit bull who attacks or attempts to attack a person 4) Charge the owners of pit bulls who attack humans with assault with a deadly weapon

@

57 years ago

0 0 0 0 0

@TechOperator Who determines what better means?

@VladTheInflator Or... we have 100M extra people that shouldn't be here

@SallyMayweather Or overload of massive numbers of new illegals that weren't planned for 40yrs ago when they built the freeways and predicted the traffic of the future.

@realtimsharp Exactly. That's why I stepped out of the local party

All that needs to be said about pit bulls was said by S-tier dog trainer Stonnie Dennis in 3 minutes

Leading Report @LeadingReport

a week ago

Jon Bernthal says fear of pit bulls is “dog racısm.”

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

4K 2K 36K 47.6M 3K

@TedHartgrave @TooWhiteToTweet Freakin boomers

@CyberWattage Lol. There isnt enough real-estate for me to put these stickers on my truc

@martyrmade It's a matter of time. He'll show himself

@IfindRetards He's a woke cuck.

@martyrmade Except he's a J

@DirtyTesLa So is it easier to text more accurately with fat fingers? Thats what im hoping