⬣ Profex ⬣ @ProfexCrypto

#Bitcoin, Richard Heart was right again. Enjoy this 47 minute clip and be inspired. You're part of a revolution that is changing the world. Real cryptocurrency and decentralized finance are the durable solution to frauds such as Sam Bankman Fried and the constant and never ending erosion of the purchasing power of "your" money by irresponsible government spending.

#Bitcoin Sam Bankman Fried was found guilty on all counts. He did so much damage because people chose to give him and his conspirators money, instead of using cryptocurrency. In crypto, you, and you alone are in charge of your money. It was invented to remove middlemen, so do so.

You only have 20 days left to comment. It is VITAL that you leave relevant and substantive comments on TWO SEPARATE proposed rules. 1. SEC: federalregister.gov/documents/2023… 2. IRS: federalregister.gov/documents/2023… 3. SEC again: If you have time, (the comment period is technically expired, but apparently they still publish and perhaps review) federalregister.gov/documents/2023… Richard Heart hasn't and won't read any of these, but you really should. You could ctrl+F for "crypto" and "digital" to find the good parts. You can use bing.com/chat and claude.ai to check your work or even to write multi pages about the subjects you ask it about. This research helps you write your own personal, relevant and substantive comments. You can submit them anonymously. The most important part of this is introducing new, relevant and novel angles that haven't already been covered. The APA law that governs them states that they must consider and perhaps respond to every relevant and substantive comment to a proposed rule during it's comment period. Apparently, anyone, anywhere, affected should comment. I see no mention of American comments only allowed. If a bad rule is made, and you didn't leave a comment that could have prevented it, it's kinda your fault. Please make substantive, relevant comments. Now. Before the Oct. 30 deadline.

Lawyers. Everything you thought you knew about #cryptocurrency and the #blockchain is wrong. The laws regarding what you possess and what you know are wildly different, as they should be. You can't possess a cryptocurrency, it's not possessable. When someone steals your purse, you don't have it anymore, they do. When someone steals your private key, you still have it. Because a private key isn't something you have, it's something you know. How many millions of people have written their seed words down somewhere. And how many of you millions have proof that no one else's eyes have seen the light reflected off that page? Every law that treats cryptocurrency as something you have instead of something you know is deeply flawed. Blockchains are about knowledge, not possession. It is fact. It is provable. It is obvious if you do the math. Here's 12 seed words from the BIP 39 word list that most "wallets" use to generate addresses: like february unaware banana paddle excite vanish secret under lounge rich fan If someone assigns value to an address derived from those, do you in fact have dominion and control, because you read those words? Do you not, in fact, have the same exact dominion and control as thousands of others now? Here's a funny one. What if someone assigned value to an address that is 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 deep in the derivation. Could you have possibly even known the value was there? It's computationally impossible to monitor a blockchain for all the possible addresses whose value your seed words might unlock. Thus, you can't even actually know what value a seed word might have, for you can't actually know the near infinite addresses it could access that could have value. And good luck trying to check again every 10 seconds a new block hits. Here's another funny party. You can even derive new addresses from your seed words using different derivation paths, so there's not just one address set. In summary. In cryptocurrency and the blockchain, there is no such thing as possession, there is only knowledge. Thus, the laws that best fit are not those concerning possession, or custody, but those that concern the creation and dissemination of knowledge. If I see that someone has scratched your back, and you know feel obligated to scratch theirs, because you're a good human with the emotion of reciprocity, am I a money transmitter because I witnessed it and would testify to it? Was not value exchange or created? What rules should govern the witnessing and professing of truth? I hope I can educate everyone about this world changing computer science breakthrough that makes truth and it's publication and verification more affordable, free and open than in any other time in the history of man. I pity any man who would stand in the way of technological progress, or worse, attempt to harm those making the world a better place. History has not been kind to such small men. There's a brighter future in store for us all, because of technology and in spite of those that attempt to stifle its progress. bip39 word list: github.com/bitcoin/bips/b… TLDR; Cryptocurrency is something you know, not something you have. A crypto wallet is a keychain, it doesn't hold money it hold's keys. When you "transfer" crypto, you didn't actually transfer anything, the things are still right where they always were. Years of wrong thinking about mathematical fact needs to be amended in the halls of power. The job of an educator is a wholesome one.

Today, Coast processed our first on-ramp transactions for Entity Accounts. Very soon, users will be able to create accounts in the name of their LLC, retirement fund or other business entity. More to come! #PulseChain $CST

I hear more speculation, "what ifs," and vague assertions than anything relevant to this SEC case against Richard Heart. The opponents of RH don't realize that it's your coins they could be targeting next. These aren't securities! There's no business venture to profit from.

Everyone go request The Highest of Stakes to be on Netflix! $HEX 👇 help.netflix.com/en/titlerequest

@MarioNawfal @elonmusk how are you going to create the everything app with financial transactions if #XTwitter can even playback recorded audio without crashing. Get a new dev team to fix #spaces. Your mic shouldn't cut out because the screen goes to sleep, nor should it crash a recording.

@TimSweeneyEpic I have a fondness for hex

@goldkey #idiocracy isn't the future, it's now!

@RichardHeartWin #Apple What are centralized app stores good for if they allow scams anyway? cointelegraph.com/news/fake-trez…

@LukeadamsUnify @milocredit You could just deposit some #ETH into @LiquityProtocol to get #LUSD or #PLS into @LiquidLoansio (launching soon) on #PulseChain to get #USDL. Fully Backed Stablecoins. Low 110% Collateral Ratio. No Repayment Schedule. Immutable. Governance-Free. No Admin Keys.

@designheretic @milocredit @LiquityProtocol @reflexerfinance @LiquidLoansio a fork of @LiquityProtocol will be launching in a few weeks on #PulseChain as well. #USDL Fully Backed Stablecoin. Low 110% Collateral Ratio. No Repayment Schedule. Immutable. Governance-Free. No Admin Keys.

@quiz_riddles @phil_punt @HumansNoContext Bad puzzle since it has multiple solutions... 7,2,6,4

Hex & Pulsechain overview : Time for a serious chat youtu.be/P82fTQFsqag via @YouTube

@SIN3R6Y @TantoNomini @Thothschild0000 @Jori_HEX @HowtoPulse @abit_HEX @Hexologist31 @HEX_TAngent @HviidHEX @Hexdek16 Hey Hexican Designers! @crypto0xJohn @kdesign25 @moses689 @kifgonza @r3b3ll10us @VicHFN Please consider ENTERING this year's CONTEST. HEXpostcards has organized another competition with cash prizes! This time its #PulseChain ;)

If you're using atomic wallet, I would sweep all my coins and assets to a new and different wallet immediately. The cause of the compromises aren't known, maybe it's a weak random number generator that made the keys, who knows.

If you want #Ethereum fees to keep going down, you should keep showing PulseChain.com love!

The original uniswap v2 whitepaper with their Numbers replaced with PulseX numbers. HOWEVER, it doesn't include the no expectations address which gets 1/100th of 1% of total trade and gets taken out from the feeTo after it hits the buy and burn contract. 2.4 Protocol fee Uniswap v2 includes a 0.07% protocol fee that can be turned on and off. If turned on, this fee would be sent to a feeTo address specified in the factory contract. Initially, feeTo is not set, and no fee is collected. A pre-specified address—feeToSetter—can call the setFeeTo function on the Uniswap v2 factory contract, setting feeTo to a different value. feeToSetter can also call the setFeeToSetter to change the feeToSetter address itself. If the feeTo address is set, the protocol will begin charging a 7-basis-point fee, which is taken as a 7/29th cut of the 29-basis-point fees earned by liquidity providers. That is, traders will continue to pay a 0.29% fee on all trades; 75.86% of that fee (0.22% of the amount traded) will go to liquidity providers, and 24.14% of that fee (0.07% of the amount traded) will go to the feeTo address. Collecting this 0.07% fee at the time of the trade would impose an additional gas cost on every trade. To avoid this, accumulated fees are collected only when liquidity is deposited or withdrawn. The contract computes the accumulated fees, and mints new liquidity tokens to the fee beneficiary, immediately before any tokens are minted or burned. Original uniswap v2 whitepaper with screenshot below: uniswap.org/whitepaper.pdf

@iambroots This is what I wrote about INC. I'll look into MOONR and put out a couple thoughts if it is comparable. Dive Deep Into PulseX’s $INC Token — The Next Big Thing In Crypto Farming wnotn.medium.com/dive-deep-into…