QMS Network @QMSNetwork

The next evolution of blockchains is verifiable compute. We already have trustless value transfer and settlement. That part works. The harder problem is proving offchain work happened the way it claims. Did the model run? Was the output honest? Was anything tampered with? Settlement is what blockchains solved first, and proof is what unlocks the next layer. Solve verifiable compute, and blockchains stop being just financial rails and become the trust layer for machine economies.

Post-quantum security is an infrastructure migration that has to happen while the network is still live. Blockchains need more than new cryptography. They need wallets to update, exchanges to support new address types, custodians to change signing systems, hardware devices to ship upgrades, bridges to adapt, and users to actually move. The coordination challenge could be bigger than the cryptography itself.

@X_Zzzz31 We will be sharing more in the near future. For now, we’re mainly keeping the community updated on X and Telegram, so feel free to join us there to stay in the loop: t.me/QMSNetworkOffi…

4,000+ people are already waiting for QMS. Miners. Builders. Clients. Investors. A post-quantum Layer-1 with useful-work at its core is starting to take shape. The waitlist is open, join here: qms.finance

Myth: Quantum computing breaks everything overnight. Reality: the risk is real, but “everything breaks at once” is not how this plays out. Quantum does not break all cryptography equally. The biggest exposure is public-key cryptography: signatures, key exchange, and public keys already visible onchain. That is why migration matters. NIST has already finalized its first post-quantum standards. Practical attacks still require large fault-tolerant quantum computers, not today’s noisy machines. But waiting for Q-Day is a mistake, because the real risk is slow upgrades, fragmented migration, and legacy keys nobody rotated. And the clock has already started...

2 things people keep mixing up: Post-quantum cryptography ≠ quantum cryptography Quantum cryptography relies on quantum physics and dedicated hardware. QKD is the famous example. Post-quantum cryptography needs neither. It is math-based security running on today’s machines. NIST finalized the first core PQC standards. NSA favors PQC over QKD for national security systems. Trump’s new executive order pushes key federal systems to PQC by 2030–31.

Quantum just moved higher on the national agenda. • The U.S. is now targeting a powerful quantum computer by 2028 • Federal post-quantum cryptography adoption by 2030–31 We're building for the new quantum era.

The White House @WhiteHouse

3 days ago

Q is for quantum 😉 Under President Trump's leadership, quantum is making a massive leap, and America is at the forefront of these innovations and groundbreaking technologies.

1K 5K 18K 1.2M 1K

Full breakdown in our first article:

QMS Network @QMSNetwork

2 weeks ago

x.com/i/article/2064…

5 5 34 5K 6

3 approaches to build a quantum-resistant chain. Each fixes a different piece, but none fixes everything: ➤ Retrofit chains inherit years of ECDSA migration debt. ➤ Native post-quantum chains treat quantum hardware as a threat to lock out, nothing more. ➤ Quantum-native designs can't ship until the hardware exists at scale. QMS takes what each approach gets right and closes the gap they all leave open. Consensus is Proof-of-Useful-Work: quantum-resistant at launch because block production runs on compute, not signatures. No public-key crypto on the consensus layer means nothing for Shor's algorithm to break. From there it opens up. The same compute that secures the chain is built to solve real optimization problems, so commercial clients pay miners for the work that already protects the network.

The QMS takeaway: The next generation of blockchain infrastructure should be built around 2 assumptions: - Security must be post-quantum by design. - Network compute should do economically useful work, not just burn resources for security. That is the direction we're building toward.

This week’s theme is infrastructure reality. Post-quantum security and AI compute both kept moving into the operational layer. These 3 signals stood out: 1️⃣ Post-quantum security is entering the public markets. EigenQ, a post-quantum cryptography firm, agreed to a ~$3B SPAC deal to list on Nasdaq as EIGQ, days after announcing a TD SYNNEX collaboration to prepare AMD EPYC server environments for the quantum transition. PQC is being priced as infrastructure, ahead of the 2027 CNSA 2.0 requirement for new US National Security System products and services. 2️⃣ NVIDIA is moving from chip vendor to landlord. NVIDIA and Sharon AI signed a six-year deal for 72MW of AI capacity in Australia, up to 40,000 GB300 GPUs, with NVIDIA reportedly receiving both chip revenue and a share of cloud service income. Compute is now power, GPUs, and multi-year revenue-share contracts. The supplier is moving deeper into the infrastructure stack. 3️⃣ The constraint is power, not capital. Senator Lummis introduced the POWER Up Act to bring large data center grid connections under FERC oversight. New York’s legislature passed a statewide data center moratorium bill. Trackers now put data center moratorium bills at 11–12+ states this cycle. That is the useful compute problem in the real world. More compute is needed, but power, grid access, and public acceptance are the bottleneck now.

The most cited quantum threat estimate just hit a record. The Global Risk Institute's expert survey now puts a 28-49% probability of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer within 10 years. Why you should care: a chain can't unpublish a public key. The data is already public, already being archived, and building the target set needs nothing but a block explorer. Hardware is the last piece. And that 10-year band overlaps precisely with where treasuries, DeFi reserves, and long-term holders live.

A quantum computer powerful enough to break every major chain's public-key encryption. GRI's latest expert survey puts the 10-year odds at 28-49%, a record high. When do you think it actually arrives?

A blockchain never forgets a public key once it’s exposed. That’s why “harvest now, forge later” hits crypto harder than almost anywhere else. The exposure doesn’t expire, the attacker just waits. (See graph below.) QMS hardens what it controls first. By design, consensus and finality are PQ-secure from day one. The execution layer keeps Ethereum signatures for EVM compatibility, with PQ signing on the roadmap.

Traditional mining networks rely on an internal security budget: token emissions, transaction fees, and token price. This makes mining sustainable only when block rewards and network activity are enough to cover miner costs. QMS proposes a different model: miners secure the network through Proof-of-Useful-Work while also producing computational output that enterprises can rent for real-world optimization tasks. That creates a potential external revenue stream, not just crypto-native fees. So yes, mining can become more self-sustaining if useful computation generates enough paid demand to subsidize miners.

When a quantum computer gets big enough, it could turn your exposed public key into your private key in about 9 minutes. Here’s the actual trick: Given a public key sitting in the open onchain, Shor’s algorithm turns key recovery into pattern-finding. It builds a function whose outputs repeat in a cycle, and the length of that cycle is fixed by the private key. So “find the private key” becomes “measure the cycle length,” and interference can answer that in a single pass. A classical computer could find that cycle too, but only by stepping through values one at a time. At 256-bit scale, that becomes the millions-of-years problem. A quantum computer approaches it differently. It loads the public key into a large quantum register, puts the register into superposition across a vast range of inputs, evaluates the function across that superposition in one shot, then applies the Quantum Fourier Transform. The QFT acts like a tuner: amplitudes matching the repeating cycle reinforce into a sharp peak, while everything off-cycle cancels. Measure the register, get the cycle length, convert it into the private key with a short classical calculation, and check it against the public key. That shortcut is the threat.

Find out more from our latest research:

QMS Network @QMSNetwork

2 weeks ago

x.com/i/article/2064…

5 5 34 5K 6

The art of designing a quantum algorithm is choosing the gate sequence so that interference reinforces useful information and cancels everything else. The diagram below shows the basic effect:

The U.S. round is the cleanest signal, but not the whole story. - China has committed an estimated $15B+ - The EU is backing quantum through €11B+ in flagship and national programs Quantum is becoming strategic infrastructure, and it’s now on government balance sheets.

Quantum is strategic infrastructure. On May 21, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced $2B in awards to 9 companies across the quantum stack. Interestingly, each award includes grant funding plus a small government equity stake. Like chips for semiconductors, but for quantum. Governments not only want quantum progress but also want exposure to the upside.