Matt SG @RedChurchillian

Brother in Christ. How we react to adversity defines us. Proud father to a very special boy. Climate realist. All views are mine alone. Reform UK 🇬🇧 🇮🇱 Bristol. Joined September 2011

Tweets

5K
Followers

809
Following

3K
Likes

9K

Tatiana Sanchez @iamtatiana

a hour ago

BREAKING: reports: local media in Mexico: England v Mexico game time moved earlier to 7pm Sunday

5 4 36 8K 0

View Details

Matt SG @RedChurchillian

4 hours ago

Off to Scotland tomorrow for a week. I wonder if anywhere’s showing the game early hours Monday? 🤔 🙄 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿⚽️

0 0 0 7 0

View Details

Matt SG @RedChurchillian

7 hours ago

Can this government do anything right?!! 🙄🤷‍♂️ Police criticise timing of decision on pubs staying open for England match bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

Matt SG @RedChurchillian

10 hours ago

@piersmorgan @Cristiano He did nothing apart from the penalty. He can’t even run properly any more!

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

When you close the door of No10 behind you, remember to turn off your Twitter feed. It has, as much all your policy mis-steps, strategic errors and vapid personality, been a constant reminder of your unfitness for high office.

Keir Starmer @Keir_Starmer

2 days ago

It might actually be coming home 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

12K 1K 24K 6.5M 1K

62 445 3K 54K 24

View Details

Ben Graham @BenGrahamUK

24 hours ago

Lisa Nandy had no problem using X when it helped Labour get elected. She's posted on here over 10'000 times in total since 2009. Now she's in government, facing far greater scrutiny, she's suddenly decided the platform is the problem. After being Community Noted multiple times and turning off replies to many of her posts in the last 12 months, walking away from X looks less like a principled stand and more like an attempt to avoid criticism. If you're in public office, scrutiny comes with the job. Running away from it is spineless.

Ben Graham @BenGrahamUK

a day ago

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy quitting X because she can’t handle the heat is a terrible look for this government. The minister responsible for media and expression walking away from the public square because she doesn’t like the platform speaks volumes. Another example of a

131 190 954 134K 6

297 2K 9K 123K 82

View Details

Matt SG @RedChurchillian

a day ago

@SeneddWaste @Beverle22804497 If they’re not here legally, what are they then?!! 🙄🤷‍♂️

0 0 2 132 0

View Details

Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ

a day ago

When Lisa Nandy says “meaningful debate” she means “people who agree with me”. If it wasn’t for Elon Musk and X, we would never have got an inquiry into the grooming gangs which Labour politicians ignored for 50 years.

Lisa Nandy MP @lisanandy

a day ago

I've decided to leave this platform and my Department will too. A platform originally designed for free speech and expression now favours abuse and misinformation over meaningful debate. It isn't healthy for our democracy or our communities and I don’t want to support it.

5 855 8K 6.3M 529

217 966 7K 76K 35

View Details

Matt SG @RedChurchillian

a day ago

You mean you only like free speech you agree with right?!! 🙄🤷‍♂️

Lisa Nandy MP @lisanandy

a day ago

5 855 8K 6.3M 529

0 0 0 2 0

View Details

Caroline Farrow @CF_Farrow

2 days ago

Another tragedy courtesy of Bridget Phillipson. She sleeps soundly in her bed knowing that there are children without places in September and people made redundant thanks to her spiteful policy.

ENT - Education Not Taxation @EducationNotTax

2 days ago

Sadly, @DurhamHighSch has announced its closure after 142 years of giving girls an education they for so long had been denied. This school has 281 pupils, leaving all but those graduating this year having to find a new school place and leave the world they knew. That now makes

73 227 758 289K 28

87 451 2K 39K 25

View Details

Matt SG @RedChurchillian

2 days ago

@piersmorgan No end product. Lacks any real quality.

0 0 0 4 0

View Details

Matt SG @RedChurchillian

2 days ago

Before you go to bed tonight. Remember to thank God that Harry Kane is English!! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿⚽️

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

Matt SG @RedChurchillian

3 days ago

@DearRebelAda In years to come when the world rows back on the insanity. People like Julia will be held in high esteem for speaking truth and common sense.

0 0 0 138 0

View Details

J Stewart @triffic_stuff_

3 days ago

😱 WOW! Listen to this, it’s INSANE! This is about as damning a verdict on Starmer and his government as you will hear: “In terms of military preparedness, we’re now the second last. [31st out of 32 members of NATO] Who’s behind us? Only Iceland, and Iceland doesn’t have a military. When it came to a choice between funding the cost of rearming our country in dangerous times, or continuing with a rapid increase in welfare benefits, benefits street won.” I knew things were bad, but I had no idea they were this bad! Shocking.

303 3K 9K 208K 547

View Details

Andrew Neil @afneil

3 days ago

Well who wudda thunk it?! The Starmer-Reeves defence spending plan assumes £10 billion in defence ‘efficiencies’/savings — and leaves Andy Burnham to find a further £5 billion for defence in the next Budget for the figures to add up. Starmer-Reeves — shysters til the very end.

255 2K 10K 210K 128

View Details

Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677

4 days ago

.@andyburnham, you say that your generation eroded public trust in politics and must take responsibility for rebuilding it. That is an unusual thing for a man to say three weeks before he enters Downing Street. We will take you at your word. You entered Parliament in 2001 under Tony Blair. You served as Culture Secretary under Gordon Brown. You were part of the government that took Britain into Iraq on the basis of intelligence that turned out to be wrong. You were part of the government that presided over the financial crisis of 2008. You were part of the political generation that began the mass immigration experiment without public consent, that signed the Lisbon Treaty without a referendum, and that left office in 2010 with public trust in politics at a historic low. You then spent eight years as Mayor of Greater Manchester. A housing fund that delivered less than five percent affordable homes. A transport network twenty two years behind London. A homelessness pledge broken within a year. A flooding problem unresolved for a decade. A grooming gang review your own whistleblower described as a cover up. An ICO finding that your authority failed to publish Freedom of Information compliance statistics. Your wife appointed to the board of a company holding a public contract with the authority you chaired. Now you are proposing to apply the Manchester Model nationally. With Ed Miliband, architect of Britain's net zero framework and the energy price crisis, as your Chancellor. With Jonathan Powell, whose China connections and vetting status remain undisclosed, as your National Security Adviser. With proportional representation to ensure that once in power the progressive coalition cannot be removed regardless of how it performs. You say you will take responsibility for rebuilding trust. The record of the generation you represent and the programme you are proposing are the reasons trust needs rebuilding in the first place. "A grooming gang review your own whistleblower described as a cover up."

30 442 1K 17K 59

View Details

J Stewart @triffic_stuff_

4 days ago

This is brilliant from Andrew Neil tearing through the BS on Burnham’s ridiculous “No 10 in the North”: “He’s gone to Manchester to deliver this speech, to show that London doesn’t dominate everything and that he’s going to spread power around the country. But he’s not going to take questions because he’s got to get back to London, which is the capital and where the power is. It’s all performative nonsense.” Says it all. Can’t face questions up North because he’s desperate to bolt back down South. The hypocrisy is unreal. Neil slammed it as purely symbolic, admitted everything will still run through London, and finished by saying Burnham needs to “grow up” because jumping from Manchester mayor to PM is a totally different job. Burnham ducks questions at every turn. He’s hiding from scrutiny for a reason. I’d love to see him sit down with @afneil, but we all know that will never happen. His premiership would be finished before it even started!

262 2K 8K 510K 521

View Details

Tom Harwood @tomhfh

4 days ago

Burnham's speech borders on the utopian. The belief that politics can be about consensus rather than confrontation. That arguments can be somehow done away with if we all hold hands and sing kum ba yah. The reason we have politics is *because* we disagree. Banishing arguments is not possible, practicable, or desirable.

71 142 1K 61K 32

View Details

Harry Cole @MrHarryCole

4 days ago

Glorious to watch the same self-declared political media nodes - who were screaming about fascism when the Tories were in power - now tap dancing to justify a zero scrutiny coup because the guy also wears trainers in his fifties. We see you.