Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

Open Science. Stats. (Board) games. Cargo bikes. Editor at Meta-Psychology. open.lnu.se/index.php/meta… Joined May 2015

Tweets

9K
Followers

2K
Following

811
Likes

8K

Spencer Greenberg 🔍 @SpencrGreenberg

a year ago

The Dunning-Kruger Effect is one of the most famous psychology findings. It's the idea that people of low competence/ability overestimate their ability. But is it REAL? At Clearer Thinking, we investigated (with surprising twists and turns): 🧵

14 42 299 44K 274

View Details

Matthew B. Jané @MatthewBJane

a year ago

Error Report #2: matthewbjane.quarto.pub/meta-analysis-… The meta-analysis by Stanyer et al. (2022) contains substantial data extraction errors (i.e., effect size calculation errors). Due to the severe data extraction errors and the meta-analytic results for memory retention scores are incorrect and hyper-inflated. The reported effects from the word-pair associate outcomes are 5x larger than the corrected effects (meta-analytic mean of corrected effects: d=0.19, mean of Stanyer et al. reported effects: d=0.98).

1 11 49 11K 21

View Details

Ruben C. Arslan @rubenarslan

a year ago

New comment in NHB by Farid Anvari, me and friends arguing that psychology is fragmented into the study of too many constructs and measures with too few links.

5 29 146 12K 54

View Details

Daniël Lakens @lakens

a year ago

Very good start of the new Metaror journal as the public peer reviews are as critical of @jamesheathers recent claim that 1 in 7 papers are fraud as I want my peer metascientists to be of such badly supported bold claims. Read the reviews here: metaror.org/kotahi/article…

1 9 20 2K 17

View Details

Carlisle Rainey @carlislerainey

a year ago

My commentary on Isager, van ‘t Veer, and Lakens’ “Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size” is now accepted at Meta-Psychology. CC: @lakens @peder_isager Preprint: osf.io/preprints/meta…

1 2 9 2K 6

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

a year ago

Hattie’s Visible Learning is a good start!

Alec Stapp @AlecStapp

a year ago

Fun question from @Sam__Enright: What’s the “anti-reading list” in your field of expertise?

640 664 12K 7.2M 6K

1 0 1 665 1

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

2 years ago

@squig @lakens @mVranka Ok that is fair!

0 0 1 60 0

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

2 years ago

@squig @lakens @mVranka What IRB is ok with the deliberate act of collecting human (however trivial) data and not publishing the results in any form? As someone who teaches research ethics, I am deeply intrigued!

1 0 1 51 0

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

2 years ago

@squig @lakens @mVranka There are, of course, situations where the benefits of research can outweigh some rights of participants, but a cavalier attitude towards it is quite schocking to me. Where I come from (Sweden) this type of deliberate behavior is probably even a punishable offense.

1 0 0 68 0

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

2 years ago

@lakens @Kim_De_Roover It is a real problem though. Many researchers shares the view that the journals are crappy and don’t review for it. Everyone loses on the prestige game.

0 0 2 104 0

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

2 years ago

@lakens @squig @mVranka I would prefer A. You are contributing to a problematic culture in academia by keeping your information secret. You then talk about all these replications you have done but people can’t verify it. It adds confusion and the net problems for everyone else is worse than your gain.

1 0 2 85 0

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

2 years ago

@lakens @squig @mVranka I think that participation in research is a cost by itself regardless of monetary compensation. Participants have the right to learn about the results of the study they took part in

2 0 0 151 0

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

2 years ago

@squig @lakens @mVranka I can in principle agree that data can be used without being shared in such a way that it’s balanced with costs. Rare but possible. Also if data is eg simulations it’s different.

1 0 1 65 0

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

2 years ago

@squig @lakens @mVranka The idea is that involving non-scientists in research incurs an ethical cost benefit analysis and that involves actually using the data. How unethical depends on type of data. It’s always problematic to collect and throw away but level varies wildly.

2 0 1 82 0

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

2 years ago

@lakens @squig @mVranka @Meta_Psy I think that pre-registrations should have a preprepared reporting function and that everyone always upload data meta-data and main results. It can be pretty much automated. Embargo shouldn’t be on lifting the registration but on sharing the results!

0 0 3 71 0

View Details

Rickard Carlsson @RickCarlsson

2 years ago

@lakens @squig @mVranka I would be very happy working on how we can create a good format for this. We tried with file drawer reports at @Meta_Psy but not with great success. Hard to review, reproduce and little interest in submitting. Clearly a lot more work is needed on that format to work.