NaeNae2424 @Rjenae

🚨 BREAKING NEWS on @SundayFutures: @SenRonJohnson reveals NEW evidence in the Senate’s investigation into Dr. Anthony Fauci — including a newly released text exchange AND email. 📱📧 Johnson says the communications raise new questions about what federal health officials knew regarding potential vaccine safety concerns — and what was communicated to the American public. WATCH his interview with @JackieDeAngelis ⬇️

ICYMI: How a Flawed Covid Study Tried—and Failed—to Discredit the Amish A study falsely implied the Amish suffered more deaths because they eschewed public health guidance. But correcting the record proved nearly impossible. sharylattkisson.substack.com/p/how-a-flawed…

THERE’S MORE: In addition to the texts, @SenRandPaul and I released an email from Dr. Janet Woodcock from May 2021. Dr. Woodcock emailed Dr. Fauci about personally receiving reports of patients experiencing hard to classify adverse events: “no one takes them seriously, no one knows how to treat them, and there is no effort to study this.” Oddly, Dr. Anthony Fauci seemed reluctant to respond to her but felt he couldn’t ignore her.   Why wasn’t the public alerted to their concerns? Why did they continue to push and mandate the COVID shot? Why weren’t Americans allowed fully informed consent? (2/2)🧵

Caught on audio: Another time top public health officials at CDC lied about Covid vaccines to the public. From: @FullMeasureNews 2021: Today we begin with an investigation regarding the Covid-19 vaccine shortages. There are serious questions about an incorrect claim made by top scientists at CDC: the nation’s premiere public health institute. Critics call it misinformation. CDC chalks it up to an “honest mistake." Whatever it is, it resulted in vaccines going to some who are said to need it the least depriving others who are said to need it the most. Like a lot of Americans, Congressman Thomas Massie already had coronavirus and wanted to know if he should still get a Covid vaccine. Most everyone who’s had Covid-19 is considered immune. But how long immunity lasts is unknown—whether it’s after infection or vaccination. An award-winning scientist himself, Massie quickly found that vaccine studies showed no benefit to people who’ve had coronavirus. Vaccination didn’t change their odds of getting reinfected. The controversy began when Massie noticed the CDC was claiming the exact opposite. CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices had just issued a high profile report authored by 15 scientists. It wrongly claimed Pfizer’s study proved the vaccine is highly effective or showed “Consistent high efficacy” for people who’d already had coronavirus—“SARS-CoV-2.” Rep. Thomas Massie: It says the exact opposite of what the data says. They're giving people the impression that this vaccine will save your life, omr save you from suffering, even if you've already had the virus and recovered, which has not been demonstrated in either the Pfizer or the Moderna trial. The mystery deepened when Massie contacted CDC for an explanation. Massie says he was so alarmed by the misinformation, he decided to record the calls. On a December 16th call, CDC’s Captain Amanda Cohn seemed to agree that people who’ve had coronavirus shouldn’t rush to get vaccinated. Dr. Cohn: People who have had disease, given that there's limited doses right now, we're, we are suggesting that those people wait. Rep. Massie: Right. That suggestion, to wait, hasn’t always gotten out. NBC News Clip, Dec. 10, 2020: Anchor Lester Holt: Should I get the vaccine if I’ve already had Covid? Dr. John Torres: Most experts say it’s a good idea because they’re not sure how protected you are after recovering. Our Full Measure investigation examined the database reporting illnesses after Covid vaccines. It shows numerous people are getting vaccinated— even though they’ve already had the virus. Some experts say that’s depriving others who need the vaccine most. CBS News Clip, January 21, 2021: Anchor Norah O’Donnell: Health officials in many states say they don’t have enough vaccine. CBS News reporter: It is happening across the country, promised doses not delivered. On the call, CDC’s Dr. Cohn thanked Massie for flagging their mistaken claim that vaccines were proven to work for people who’ve had coronavirus. Dr. Amanda Cohn: I think we read that thing so many times that when, you know, we just skipped right over it. We know we can't be perfect, we know we're gonna miss things. You will forever after be known in our office as “Eagle-Eyed Man.” Rep. Massie: They said, “Thank you for finding the mistake. We're going to fix this.” And I thought, “Well, okay, problem solved. This is how government works.” But it didn’t quite turn out that way. Two days later, the same Dr. Cohn who’d promised a fix, joined other CDC doctors in repeating the false information, this time in an online session for medical professionals. They claimed studies show people who’ve had coronavirus do benefit from the vaccine. Dr. Amanda Cohn (CDC video): “So Sara Oliver, what, should people who’ve had Covid-19 be vaccinated and should they be vaccinated now?” Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC video): “...Data from both clinical trials suggests that people with prior infection are still likely to benefit from vaccination.” Then, this past week, a full month after CDC promised to correct the false information, Massie found it was still on CDC’s website. Rep. Massie: So I called them up on Tuesday, as soon as I could, to ask them why it hadn't been fixed. And it was like, I was starting all over with the same people. And instead of fixing it, they proposed repeating it and just phrasing their mistake differently. Anstice Brand: I’m always happy to talk with you. This call with CDC’s Washington DC Director Anstice Brand: Rep. Massie: If there's a "they," who is refusing to fix something that is factually and provably wrong, I wanna know who “they” is. Because this is gonna result, and it's already resulting in misallocationof the vaccine Brand: Let me check that and get back to you as soon as possible. Massie also argued the point in a call with Dr. Sara Oliver, the CDC scientist who gave the misinformation on the web video. Rep. Massie: Hi, this is Congressman Thomas Massie. Is this Dr. Oliver? Dr. Sarah Oliver: Yes Rep. Massie: There was an error and I noticed you are an author on it and I wondered if I could get your help in getting this error corrected. You can't say it's efficacious for people with prior infection. That's an absolutely untrue sentence Dr. Oliver: Yeah, I mean, we're- we're still recommending that individuals who have prior infection receive the vaccine. Um, but we wouldn't want to put out that if you had COVID before, you shouldn't get the vaccine. Rep. Massie: Actually, if you've had COVID before, and there's a 75-year-old person who can't get the vaccine and you're 30-years-old, you are, you should not get the vaccine because you are wasting resource. It will lead to people who- who die or have medical complications because we have a limitation of the vaccine. That's why I think it's important that that document get fixed Dr. Oliver: Okay. I- I can, um, I can talk with MMWR, and with Dr. Cohn and see, if, if we can tweak that language a little bit Full Measure found several other scientists equally critical of CDC’s incorrect claim. Jay Bhattacharya is a professor of medicine at Stanford University. Sharyl : CDC has had a scientific policy guidance on its website that claims the coronavirus vaccine has proven equally safe and effective in all age groups, races, and so on— and including for those who previously had a coronavirus infection, COVID-19. Is that your understanding— Is that true? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: That second part is not true. People who have had previous infection, the vaccine, the evidence, the trial evidence shows that it is not effective in additionally preventing the disease. Why would it be? You're already immune. If the CDC has on its site, that it is doing the public a disservice, both to people that get vaccinated that don't really need it because they've been previously infected, and also the people who should be prioritized to vaccine, but aren't getting it because of shortages. We asked CDC, Dr. Oliver and Dr. Cohn for interviews but they declined. Some of the agency’s response was summed up during Congressman Massie’s final call with CDC this past week. It was with CDC Principal Deputy Director Anne Schuchat. Thomas Massie: I feel like right now, we have the tail wagging the dog, that the folks who want to do the messaging, the folks who want everybody to get the vaccine, have pressured the folks who are doing the science, i.e. reviewing the Phase III trial from Pfizer, not to correct the document—but the document is false. So the CDC can do whatever messaging they want. That's, that's the CDC's job, not my job. But they cannot propagate false and incorrect science. So that's my position. And I'm- Dr. Schuchat: Sure. Thomas Massie: ... really disappointed it's gone on a month without being fixed. Like, really disappointed Dr. Schuchat: As you note correctly, there is not sufficient analysis to show that in the subset of only the people with prior infection, there's efficacy. So you're correct that that sentence is wrong and that we need to make a correction of it. I apologize for the delay. But in terms of a large scale, you know, trying to mislead people, I just give you my word that that was not the intent. So really apologize about the confusion that we apparently caused, and perhaps the, as you say, you know, people who are fairly low risk rushing to get vaccine ahead of people who are higher risk. CDC has now issued a correction. But Massie and other scientists we asked say the new wording still wrongly implies studies show vaccines work in people who have had coronavirus. Rep. Massie: And instead of fixing it, they proposed repeating it and just phrasing their mistake differently. So, at that point, right now I consider it a lie. I think the CDC is lying about the efficacy of the vaccine based on the Pfizer trials, for those who have already had the Coronavirus. Sharyl (on-camera): As for how 15 scientists who could have originally signed on to a paper that so plainly misrepresented vaccine studies there is no clear answer.

Bill Melugin @BillMelugin_

a week ago

More texts reveal that Biden era US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy responded to Fauci’s concern about the COVID vaccine in pregnant women by adding “I’ve been hearing concern about the mRNA causing mutations in the developing fetus as well.” None of these concerns were ever made

663 8K 21K 2.4M 2K

It's not enough to yell "$10,000 gold" and "$200 silver" without facts, analysis and an explanation of market dynamics. This new interview gives you all three. youtu.be/YLBdE3fTIbo

Bad policy hurts people. Utah started down a path of ridiculously harmful policy around 2009. California had just passed Prop 8 with big support from the LDS church. Obama had just taken office, The biggest federal raid in US history had just taken place in Blanding, UT. The California gay community vowed vengeance on Utah. The public private partnership, Envision Utah, under the direction of Mike Leavitt was finding its purpose and funding. Then forming Leavitt Partners in 2009 focused on health care. The Steed Group, the Bennett Group, the Reagan Round table, the Reagan Caucus, all pushing Cox for POTUS 2028. So when Nomi health starts up with support from Cox, Ryan Smith, Ashton Kutcher, we start to recognize that Utah is captured by people who hate us, or at least hate what has traditionally been Utah. You may agree with Cox and friends or not, but what they have done and are doing is well planned and executed. I love how the Reagan Caucus’s stated mission in Utah is to steer the GOP away from populism. 🤦‍♂️ reagancaucus.org/introducing-th… ksl.com/article/news/p… In the 2024 GOP primary, the Utah Reagan Caucus has endorsed Gov. Spencer Cox against his challenger, state Rep. Phil Lyman, R-Blanding; Rep. Celeste Maloy against her 2nd District opponent, Colby Jenkins; Rep. John Curtis in the race to fill Sen. Mitt Romney's open seat; State Auditor John Dougall in the race to replace Curtis in the 3rd Congressional District; and a number of state and municipal candidates. While national Reagan Caucus entities exist, Stapley acts as the local ambassador and director in Utah, actively using X to build a "ground game" aimed at steering the local GOP away from populist factions. [1, 2]

CAPT. BIG ROCK 🦅 @BigRockInsights

3 days ago

Mark Norman: “You go to Salt Lake City, you get chased.” Joe Rogan: “They have bad homeless?” Ari Shaffir: “SLC is BAD for homeless.” Shane Gillis: “When I started standup in Salt Lake, I thought this was the nicest, cleanest city. Then we landed and there was 10 homeless

144 223 3K 610K 344

It was unsafe and unethical to administer mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women and women of childbearing potential. That's why they were excluded from the 2020 registrational trials. Dr Rochelle Walensky knew this while smiling and telling women that vaccination at any time during pregnancy is fine. Courtesy FINNERTY, NewsMax @RobFinnertyUSA @NEWSMAX @adaraallen723 @twc_health

Here’s the MOST damning part if Andrew Wilson’s disastrous Candace Owens debate. Here he 100% contradicts himself & unwittingly reveals he doesn’t believe anything he’s saying & it’s all a con. Andrew’s opening statement: “I think it’s ghoulish to profit off the death of a good man” He then reads a text he says Charlie Kirk sent the night before in which Charlie says he’s afraid the “Left is going to kill him” He’s asked to show the text to the audience but Andrew refuses BUT says he’s will show it on his show. When asked why he won’t show it to the audience during the debate but only show it on his own show he says: “ You gotta drip out that evidence to keep people coming back to the show” So he unwittingly admits it’s to “profit off of the death of a good man” by using Charlie’s text for views & money. And there you have it. His whole appearance is a Con. He doesn’t believe anything he says, he’s a clout chasing phony who is the opposite of what he claims to be. And he just accidentally told on himself.

If you had trusted the settled science of the day, here is how it would have gone. 1890s: you dose the baby with Bayer's new cough syrup, the non-addictive alternative to morphine, marketed for children. It was heroin. They named it after the German for heroic. 1900s: you rub calomel teething powder on your infant's gums. It is a mercury compound, and it leaves a generation with pink disease. Swollen, peeling hands and feet, screaming for months, and some of them died. 1910s: you cook in Crisco, launched by a soap and candle company, because cottonseed oil is modern and lard is what your mother used. The process that made it solid produced trans fat, banned outright a century later. 1920s: you drink Radithor, certified radioactive water, on prescription. Eben Byers took fourteen hundred bottles for his vitality. His jaw was removed in pieces and he was buried in a lead coffin. 1930s: a chemist dissolves a new sulfa drug in diethylene glycol, which is antifreeze. It kills 107 people, mostly children, and only then does America give the FDA power to demand safety testing. 1940s: your doctor lights a Camel in the surgery. More doctors smoke them than any other brand, and the advert runs in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which sold him the page. 1950s: DDT is sprayed over your kitchen, your garden and your children at school. The man who found its insecticidal properties has already been given a Nobel Prize. 1960s: your wife takes thalidomide for morning sickness because it is remarkably safe. More than ten thousand children are born with missing and shortened limbs. 1970s: the country puts down the butter and picks up the margarine, on the instruction of the American Heart Association. The fat everybody switched to was banned in 2015 as unsafe at any level. 1980s: the fat comes out of everything and sugar goes back in to make it edible. Obesity begins a climb it has never come off. 1990s: your father is prescribed OxyContin, because fewer than one per cent get addicted. The company later pleads guilty to criminal misbranding, and the overdose count runs into hundreds of thousands. 2000s: you take Vioxx for your knee. It is pulled in 2004, and the FDA's own safety officer estimates tens of thousands of excess heart attacks. Not one of those was fringe. Every one had a professional body, a literature and a man in a white coat standing behind it. Nobody who followed that advice was stupid. They were obedient, to the most qualified people available. Settled is a word about money. It means the questions stopped being funded, so they stopped being asked. So which of today's instructions will your grandchildren read out in disbelief. The oil washed in hexane and built into every cell you own. The statin that blocks the pathway making your hormones, to prevent one heart attack per hundred people. The injection where a third of the loss is muscle. The infant formula built out of vegetable oil. All settled. None of it funded to be otherwise.

$330 SILVER Japan's Debt Crisis Could Send Silver to $330 • Francis Hunt • #Silver #Gold youtu.be/dM6Lm2iMg4w?is…

Excellent podcast from Jordan.

Brian Wilkes @BrianGoodner

3 days ago

Everyone thinking the $500 target for Silver is ridiculous, should check out Jordan Roy-Byrne's new video which shows Silver ETFs as a % of all ETFs compared with the last Silver bull market. The LOW in the last Silver Bull market % was 2%. Right now the % is .25%. So 8x less,

8 50 349 95K 118

Andy Schectman interviews Michael Oliver, who remains firmly bullish on silver’s move into true price discovery. Oliver still sees $300 to $500 silver as part of the current cycle, arguing the plunge from $120 to $64 was only a mid-cycle correction. He believes silver’s 50-year range between roughly $5 and $50 has finally broken, and like copper and lead after similar multi-decade breakouts, silver could now move into an entirely new price reality

Bro's ready for fallout😎

This is literally witness testimony. The fact Erika Kirk isn’t in jail is crazy to me

Lucy Riles @LucyRiles

3 days ago

73 412 4K 391K 644

Nomi Prins predicts BIS Will Make Silver A Tier 1 Asset Sending Silver Price Skyrocketing: 'I see #Gold going to $6,000 by the turn of this year and #Silver over $120... and I see Silver going to $180 next year' kingworldnews.com/nomi-prins-pre…

Dear Bill Maher, I am waiting for your apology for you yelling at me on your podcast about the Jan 6th “Insurrection” that turns out to be an inside job WITH 26 @FBI CONFIDENCIAL HUMAN SOURCES…

Charlie Kirk explains why he believes the Bible is being misinterpreted to justify illegal immigration-and argues that its teachings actually say something very different.

I interviewed an investor who co-founded a Quantum Fund with George Soros in 1973. That fund returned 4,000%+ in the same time the S&P did 47%. Jim Rogers sat down with me & shared insights every retail investor needs to hear right now: 1) Buy gold & silver if it's price drops

What happens when headlines replace hard facts? "Truth Under Fire" explores how Charlie Kirk was framed—and what it reveals about narrative warfare and the future of free speech. Watch the full documentary now on The Epoch Times.👇

When India accidentally wiped out its vultures, half a million people died in five years. The bird doing zoomies in this video runs the most extreme digestive system in the animal kingdom. Vulture stomach acid sits near pH 1, strong enough to destroy anthrax, rabies, and botulism in the carcasses they eat. A flock strips a cow to bone in about 45 minutes. India had 50 million of them. Free sanitation at national scale, in a country where religious custom means most cattle die natural deaths and every dead cow becomes a carcass someone has to deal with. Then the patent on diclofenac expired in 1994. Farmers started using the cheap painkiller on livestock. Trace amounts left in a carcass cause kidney failure in vultures. Within a decade, 50 million birds fell to a few thousand. The fastest collapse of any bird species since the passenger pigeon. The carcasses didn't disappear. Feral dogs took the vultures' place and brought rabies with them. Rotting remains leached into waterways. In districts where vultures once thrived, human death rates rose more than 4 percent. Economists at Chicago and Warwick put the toll at 100,000 extra deaths a year and $69 billion in annual damages. So yes, the goofy bird sprinting down the walkway is adorable. It's also a disease firewall that evolution spent millions of years building and one generic painkiller nearly erased in ten.

Lucy @TheLucyShow1

5 days ago

I’ll never look at another Vulture the same again 😂

2K 13K 123K 41.3M 20K