R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

We are reformed theological thugs who complain, debate, discuss and think about contemporary issues from a theological perspective. https://t.co/Ej5bzhu6sU reformedthugs.substack.com Knoxville, TN Joined January 2023

Tweets

109
Followers

52
Following

620
Likes

286

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@keithedwards What are you, a girl?

1 0 0 12 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@megbasham He needs to grow a pair...tired of the sissies bringing forward their 1st world problems.

0 0 1 16 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@AbbyJohnson Hmm, "Women are not made to have babies" ... well ... yes they are.

0 0 0 17 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@CWJohnson01 I'm amill so I need to use a few to get alternative views. In no particular order: (1) Mounce, The Book of Revelation, Eerdmans, (2) Osborne, Revelation, Baker Academic, (3) Gregg, Revelation: Four Views, A Parallel Commentary and (4) Phillips, Revelation (Reformed Commentary).

0 0 1 148 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@simonateba We are all flawed because we all have sinned (Romans 3:23). However, that does not mean we can not challenge one another and work to sharpen our thoughts.

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@simonateba Content reflects your ideology. What you focus on reveals what's important to you. You have plenty of choices when it comes to content, so the content you choose embodies the ideas you embrace.

1 0 0 16 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@simonateba Both can be true at the same time as well as your assertions, which you identified when "something is great" and when "things are bad" can also be subjective. Who determines what's great and what's bad? Also, how is it about winning? Isn't there something bigger than you winning?

0 0 1 46 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@simonateba Wow, what is your issue? Are you purposely trying to push people away? What has happened to you?

0 0 0 25 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@simonateba In the Federalist papers, Hamilton envisions judges interpreting, not enforcing or commanding, and always within a constitutional framework and never on political grounds.

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@simonateba In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton discusses the role of the judiciary: “The judiciary ... has no influence over either the sword or the purse ... It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment.”

3 0 0 27 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@simonateba He did, however, affirm judicial review: “A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning...”

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@simonateba Hamilton emphasizes the judiciary as the “least dangerous branch” because it cannot enforce its rulings or make laws—it can only interpret them.

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@simonateba Thanks, UK, DE, DK & FI, now I know which countries I won't be visiting.

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@simonateba What the hell does this mean?

0 0 3 176 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@ABC @SenBlumenthal Danang Dick, your approach to @Kash_Patel today was disgusting and embarrassing to this country. You should be ashamed of yourself and you are not doing a good job of representing the good citizens of CT. Your poor attempt at sophistry and continual pontification are sleazy.

0 0 1 19 0

View Details

R. T. Thugg @RtThugg

a year ago

@Avalanche I've been a fan since this team was in Quebec and I moved to Colorado only months before the Nordiques moved to Denver. This one hurts and I don't see the logic in not paying him. We are in the prime years of McKinnon and Makar and you took a key piece out of the mix.