SHADOW OF THINGS TO COME @STCSEVEN77

@chefsevenn @KidKool4U Yes!

@lippyent @Hdex5ptrump Nothing!

@_TruthZone_ Could be!

@usludurkizim 24?

🚨 FORMER HEALTHCARE CEO GOES VIRAL EXPOSING WHAT AMERICANS FEED THEIR KIDS — NOW PEOPLE ARE WORRIED ABOUT HIS SAFETY He starts pulling apart foods millions of Americans, including children, eat every single day. Pork. Cheese. Frozen desserts. Then he starts naming ingredients and production methods he claims most Americans have absolutely no idea they’re consuming. He says the same system Americans trust to approve medicines is also allowing things into the food supply that he says he refuses to put in his own body. Then he reveals his background: “I used to be a CEO, a former healthcare administrator.” “I can go get a $300,000 to $500,000-a-year job again to poison you… but I found a soul.” Now the clip is exploding online and people are saying they’re worried about his safety after hearing what he’s willing to say publicly. If this stuff is really safe, why don’t other countries want it in their food?

@HorsesSphere_15 127?

So Pfizer employees were given saline while the rest of the population was given infertility and turbo cancer

WikiLeaks @WikiQLeaks

3 weeks ago

🚨 Pfizer employees were given a “special batch” of vaccines. Different from what was forced into the general population.

140 3K 5K 448K 1K

Interesting!

@0xLuciferCore 34?

BREAKING: FDA Data Reanalysis Sent to HHS Finds Moderna’s mRNA Flu Shot Approval Should Be Immediately Withdrawn We directly reanalyzed the FDA’s own data used to approve mFLUSIVA and found an extreme risk-benefit profile that is impossible to justify, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH. Kyle Diamantas, JD, current Acting Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Dr. Heidi Overton nominated to be permanent, full-time FDA Commissioner have a mess on their hands. Overton has < 15 peer-reviewed publications and no track record on experience with published safety data or how to manage risk-benefit analyses. URL TheFocalPoints. @SecKennedy @HeidiOverton @NicHulscher @Docjohnc @neo7bioscience @McCulloughFund

Parents are told not to give their babies honey before age one because their developing bodies are especially vulnerable. Yet from birth, babies are recommended vaccines that can contain aluminum adjuvants and other ingredients most parents have probably never been told much about. Why aren’t parents encouraged to ask the same questions about what’s being injected into their babies? What’s in each shot? How much are they receiving at once? What happens when multiple vaccines are given together? And what do we know about the cumulative exposure across the childhood schedule? Parents deserve the right to make fully informed decisions for their own children.

@lunadreaamy 41?

@ThrillaRilla369 @LindaNDanny The opinion may be unpopular, but it’s so very true…and, it’s ALL OF THEM!!!

COVID-19 Vaccines cause aggressive cancers called "Turbo Cancer" Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, Johnson & Johnson I have been warning about this since 2022, when I identified this phenomenon in COVID-19 jabbed Canadian doctors who were dying of cancer... warnings that were covered up by @CMA_Docs Most of the 9000+ Cancer patients I helped in the past 3 years were COVID-19 Vaccinated Turbo Cancers are very different: they are far more aggressive they present at later stages they grow more rapidly they spread in unpredictable ways they are resistant to conventional treatments In 2023, my research identified the top 5 Turbo Cancers: 1. Lymphoma, confirmed by dozens of published cases 2. Brain Cancer (Glioblastoma usually) 3. Breast Cancer (Triple Negative usually) 4. Colon Cancer (Stage 4 presentation) 5. Lung Cancer (Stage 4, aggressive NSCLC) In 2025, I testified to the National Citizen's Inquiry about Turbo Cancer in children (21 cases in VAERS): Ages 12-19 Turbo Cancer: 1. Lymphoma 2. Sarcoma 3. Leukemia Ages 5-11 Turbo Cancer 1. Leukemia 2. Lymphoma Ages 0-4 Turbo Cancer Leukemia At this point in time, there are over 100 published papers confirming the link between all COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer. However, no one is talking about COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine induced Turbo Cancers in children. That's the next tsunami and just how we're talking about how "everyone has Stage 4 Cancer" today in a few years we'll be talking about how many children have Stage 4 Cancer.

Bohemian Atmosphere @BohemianAtmosp1

a month ago

Trust the science.

80 66 256 198K 13

The LARGEST human study on Ivermectin + Mebendazole for cancer is now peer-reviewed and published in a major oncology journal. 84.4% of patients reported COMPLETE REMISSION, TUMOR SHRINKAGE, or HALTED TUMOR GROWTH. Patients took 25 mg Ivermectin and 250 mg Mebendazole. After 6 months, patients had an 84.4% Clinical Benefit Ratio (CBR)—meaning more than four out of five patients reported either: No evidence of disease (32.8%) Tumor regression (15.6%) Cancer stabilization (36.1%) Cheap. Off-patent. Widely available. Yet for years it was viciously attacked, censored, and ridiculed as “horse paste” while millions died from cancer — and the industry made trillions pushing toxic chemo and lifelong “treatments.” This wasn’t an accident. They don’t want cures. They want customers. The dam has broken and the suppression is being exposed.

@harryfisherEMTP Wonderful news❣️

🚨 BREAKING: This week the American Academy of Pediatrics — the group that shapes the childhood vaccine schedule — told the country it's "neutral." Their words: "we go by science, not politics." So I pulled their tax records. Here's who actually pays them.. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) runs on ~$138 MILLION a year. Its corporate "partners" — $50,000+ donors — include the vaccine makers themselves: Pfizer, Merck, Moderna, Sanofi. Source: their own IRS Form 990 On one AAP COVID-19 vaccine policy, the science outlet Undark found 9 of 16 committee members had taken money from vaccine manufacturers. The published guideline said: "no potential conflicts." 9 of 16. They wrote "none." And this isn't unique to the AAP — it's the pattern. Peer-reviewed, JAMA Internal Medicine (2018): 57% of authors of clinical guidelines for high-revenue drugs had financial ties to the makers — and 1 in 4 payments were undisclosed. The science documents the conflict of interest. The AAP doesn't just take the money — it lobbies. It keeps a full-time, four-person federal lobbying team and reported ~$789,000 in lobbying in a single quarter of 2026. Ask why a "neutral" group of children's doctors needs its own lobby shop. Same playbook, different drug. AAP's 2023 childhood obesity guidelines urged doctors to consider weight-loss drugs for kids. 10 of the authors had taken money from those drug companies. Disclosed in the guideline? No. In 2011 the Gates Foundation paid the AAP $1,419,200 — in the Foundation's own words — "to organize and facilitate immunization education and advocacy efforts among pediatricians." Paid to advocate. Why it matters: in 1986, Congress shielded vaccine makers from most lawsuits. Since then a federal program has paid ~$5.5 BILLION for vaccine injuries (HRSA). The makers are protected. The group promoting the schedule takes their money. The question every parent deserves answered: is the group that calls itself "neutral" being paid by the companies that profit from the schedule? The documents say yes. If you want the documents mainstream accounts won't show you, follow @therealisticrn. I'm a nurse. I bring receipts, not fear.

@TheHumanLead1 @cethomas19 …because “they” are actually men!

@farman4x 8?