Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

Joined March 2026

Tweets

181
Followers

101
Following

1K
Likes

51

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

2 days ago

@deepcandles What’s your view on Crosslink?

1 0 3 39 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

2 days ago

@crackedmonk The thing is I don’t see how it’s ever possible for any asset in any situation to have asymmetric upside without also having significant downside risk.

1 0 2 28 0

View Details

@crackedmonk I believe it’s extremely undervalued, but I also believe it could very easily drop to that price (or lower), because it’s very risky and very volatile. I have significant exposure while accepting that risk. I think the recent washout did strengthen the holder base a lot.

1 0 5 36 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

2 days ago

@zkDragon @zooko @Zpartan @sacha Thanks for the response. So that explanation is for Ironwood? In what ways is Tachyon stronger than Ironwood then?

1 0 2 107 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

2 days ago

@zooko @zkDragon @Zpartan @sacha Hi, I have a question about formal verification in Ironwood. Assuming that is successfully rolled out, how much stronger will assurance against inflation vulnerabilities be as compared to the current state (Orchard pool without formal verification)?

1 0 2 91 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

2 days ago

@0xFrenxbtdotxrp Bitcoin hasn’t done anything special since 2017, nearly a decade ago. Its returns since then have been fine but frankly underwhelming (in my opinion) comparatively.

0 0 0 19 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

2 days ago

@BenGiove What’s your prediction for a cycle?

1 0 0 100 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

2 days ago

@ThePumponomics What’s your general prediction?

0 0 0 15 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

3 days ago

@zectrillionaire The entirety of the crypto market trades and is valued on monetary premium. This is part of the reason why in my opinion the only crypto assets which make any sense whatsoever are credible SoV coins. And there are so few of those.

1 0 0 57 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

3 days ago

@monerify If however it was exploited, then obviously that’s a different and much worse scenario,

0 0 0 29 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

3 days ago

@monerify Well the existence of the vulnerability was not bullish, but IF it wasn’t exploited and leads to formal verification sooner, then the end result could still be a much stronger system.

1 0 0 31 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

3 days ago

@zectrillionaire What theory is that?

1 0 0 40 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

3 days ago

@SPCMNandHOBBES I am so baffled by CT’s bizarre belief in cycles repeating over and over based on a tiny sample size. There are so few coins which have any credible value proposition whatsoever. I believe SoV is the only thing that makes sense for blockchain, and barely any coins fit that.

0 0 2 124 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

3 days ago

@R89Capital Do you still hold Bitcoin?

2 0 0 208 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

3 days ago

@SPCMNandHOBBES What are your BTC and ZEC predictions?

0 0 0 1K 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

3 days ago

@SPCMNandHOBBES The only crypto value proposition that makes any sense is Store of Value, and incredibly few coins are credible contenders for that.

0 0 0 137 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

3 days ago

@tulipking @5morewhooppers @gametheorizing Because if that was so clear and obvious (which, again, I’m not saying it is, but hypothetically speaking), then you couldn’t also be so sure that buyers wouldn’t happily step in at a price they viewed attractive.

0 0 1 34 0

View Details

Lou Smith @SnakeGreener

3 days ago

@tulipking @5morewhooppers @gametheorizing And one other thing to try to explain what I’m saying. I’m NOT saying that the bid necessarily would be strong. It could easily be extremely weak. Just that’s it’s incoherent to then also be extremely confident (which I’m not) of eventual much higher prices.