WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

Killed three at one blow. Five more to beat the record. Melbourne, Australia, Earth Joined September 2013

Tweets

4K
Followers

88
Following

451
Likes

5K

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

5 days ago

@ejwwest @TimMadigan9 Not to mention the millions in savings from not having to deal with crop failures, habitat loss, water scarcity and adapting to massive changes to climate.

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

5 days ago

@ProfileTrades @ejwwest @medialens Editing

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

@norsensis @ClimatePNowak @misterduncan Because natural systems have achieved an equilibrium over millions of years, and until we started pumping tonnes of carbon that had been buried for millions of years into the atmosphere, feedback kept it at a reasonably stable balance. Upsetting that balance will impact us.

0 0 1 11 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

5 days ago

@norsensis @misterduncan @StewartNial How much do you know about scientific journals? What is it about scientific consensus that makes it "woke left-wing"? What evidence do you have that climate science is based on a political agenda and not facts, danorse? Answer any or all of those, but with facts, not opinions.

2 0 1 13 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

6 days ago

@GerardAMorrow You are not reading and quoting from Hansen et al.'s paper, you are copying from an AI summary. The "major problem" was investigated, and was also coincidentally a period when aerosols were a factor due to human activity.

0 0 0 2 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

6 days ago

@GerardAMorrow You claim to have read Hansen et al. They literally explain the mechanism. Do you understand the the concentration of CO2 increased by over 50% in the last two centuries? Do you understand that that is a very rapid rate of increase geologically speaking?

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

6 days ago

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

6 days ago

@MichelleJil Is this like the general American lack of understanding that global means more than just the USA? There are clear WORLDWIDE increases in extreme heat, even if this MAY not be the case in mainland US. Interesting choice of metric used: doesn't indicate frequency of very hot days.

0 0 0 7 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

6 days ago

@GrahamLKeegan This chapter is focused on regional impacts, and uses must stricter confidence limits than global detection of change. Variability is larger, signals are noisier, and data coverage is not as even on the regional scale, especially over the available time periods for some regions.

0 0 1 7 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

6 days ago

@GrahamLKeegan The IPCC explicitly left blank cells when there was no or insufficient data or certainty. This is scientifically robust and honest. And should indicate to you that the IPCC do not make any scientific claims without robust evidence to support it. AGW is real, and a real issue.

1 0 2 18 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

6 days ago

@GerardAMorrow Hansen et al explain the greenhouse mechanism that IS causing the global temperatures to rise. Overall, their modelling results matched long-term observed temperature records. The issue of cooling during 1940-70 despite rising CO₂ was intensively studied by climate scientists.

1 0 0 129 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

6 days ago

@liber8SA South Australia generates over 75% of its electricity from wind and rooftop solar. Tasmania aims to produce 150% of its own energy needs from renewables by 2030. Last month (May 2026), renewables provided 41.4% of total electrical production across Australia. This is growing.

2 0 0 51 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

a week ago

@CalmLogical @BurntSynapse @waynejones36805 Little. I could tell you the difference. But I am not ready to throw away notions of relative space and time. Why do you ask? Do you have a Theory of Everything you'd like to sell me? 😄

1 0 0 17 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

a week ago

@CalmLogical @BurntSynapse @waynejones36805 It's a well thought out religious adage that "God works in mysterious ways". God working in mysterious ways is totally indistinguishable from there being no God either present or taking any interest in whatever we do. It also makes it easy to falsely attribute coincidence to God.

1 0 1 17 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

a week ago

@cupcake7166 @BrockRiddickIFB The Greeks calculated the circumference of the earth over 2000 years ago using the angle of shadows. You can do the same experiment - easier now with instant communication so you can enlist the help of distant colleagues. Closing your mind to science is not waking up, my friend.

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

2 weeks ago

@CalmLogical @BurntSynapse @waynejones36805 I am normally quite dubious about interesting proposals from strangers on social media :-D

1 0 0 14 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

2 weeks ago

@CalmLogical @BurntSynapse @waynejones36805 Don't hate Christians any more than any one else. Misandrist is probably not correct, as hate is really too strong a word, but I dislike the human race in general, so all people equally without any need for discriminating by religious beliefs. But many individuals I am fond of.

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

2 weeks ago

@CalmLogical @BurntSynapse @waynejones36805 Feel free to apologise to me for your assumptions any time you like, as well.

1 0 0 7 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

2 weeks ago

@CalmLogical @BurntSynapse @waynejones36805 Have answered you elsewhere but: you were arguing against a poster arguing against the OP (who said "evolution is rubbish"). Indicating you agreed with the OP and thought "evolution is rubbish". You seemed offended that believing in Noah's ark is childish. But yes, I assumed.

1 0 0 8 0

View Details

WeAreTooMany @TheLightons

2 weeks ago

@CalmLogical @BurntSynapse @waynejones36805 Please provide evidence for my ideology of hate for Christians. Noah's ark is a children's story. I can laugh at you for believing it based on no other evidence than one book, but that doesn't mean I hate you. Let's stop the argument then: you do support evolutionary biology?