Sherri Lange @TorWindAction

“Spain has been very very uncooperative and so has the UK,” the president didn’t just trash Britain from the oval office , he outflanked Britain’s chaos operation in the Straight of Hormuz

Wildlife Photographer Of The Year has been won by amateur photographer An amateur photographer from the UK has won a prestigious Wildlife Photographer Of The Year award 🏆 ⁠ ⁠ Nima Sarikhani captured the image of a sleeping polar bear on an iceberg off Norway's Svalbard archipelago.⁠ ⁠ The picture, titled Ice Bed, has been crowned the winner of the Natural History Museum's Wildlife Photographer Of The Year people's choice award, after being whittled down to a shortlist of 25 from almost 50,000 entries from around the world.

@Gio0357 @nicksortor What a nasty post. I wonder how delicately u might handle this explosive situation. I personally think it's absolutely amazing the situation hasnt spiralled into hell on earth.

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump says Iran WILL be handing over their enriched uranium “nuclear dust” for destruction, and now the only question is HOW it’s done It’s either: A) The US will take possession of it, bring it home, and destroy it B) Destroyed in place in Iran with the oversight of the Atomic Energy Commission (or equivalents)

🚨😡💥 OUTRAGEOUS COVER-UP IN CANADA’S OWN POLICE HEARING! Bath-Sheba van den Berg — Barrister & Solicitor, called to the Bar in Alberta and Ontario, founder of Egronomy Law, expert in constitutional, administrative, human rights & regulatory law — just TORCHED the hearing while defending Detective Helen Grus! 😭👶 This is during the internal disciplinary misconduct hearing against Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus (charged with “discreditable conduct” for daring to investigate sudden infant deaths and asking about COVID vaccine status of parents). Van den Berg was cross-examining witnesses and addressing the hearing officer/tribunal adjudicator Chris Renwick when this bombshell dropped. 😳 ⚡️ The hearing officer physically lurched forward in his wheeled chair and yelled “STOP!” as the horrific Pfizer data was being stated — a moment burned into van den Berg’s mind forever. 😳 FULL TRANSCRIPT (Bath-Sheba van den Berg speaking in the hearing): “In the clinical data itself, it reported that there was 270 women – actually 274 women that had unanticipated pregnancies. And that means that they weren’t actually part of the clinical trial themselves. They just had unanticipated pregnancies and that out of the 274 – and they said four were fetus cases, so if we look at actually 270 is actually the figure. That 238 outcomes are unknown. So they didn’t know what happened to two hundred and thirty-eight pregnancies but they did know about the other 32, and 31 had died. Thirty-one babies have died out of 32. That’s a 97% fatality rate during the Pfizer clinical trials. Now, [referring to] Detective Gruss while she was testifying – she’s sitting there in front of me facing [them] and she’s stating simply that 31 out of 32. And as she was stating that, the hearing officer lurched forward because you’ve got to remember these chairs… this chair right here has wheels on it… kind of lurched forward. It said ‘stop’. As he was stating that information. And she just went like this [gesture]. I know I’ll never forget that image. And it’s because of that image that has been burned into my mind. But I thought it is important to talk about her case publicly. Not just her case, for what she was looking [at].” THIS IS PURE EVIL. A top human rights lawyer dropping Pfizer’s own trial data showing 97% baby fatality in tracked cases — and the tribunal officer shuts it down on the spot?! While they persecuted a detective for simply asking questions about dead infants matching the exact adverse events Pfizer reported. How DARE they silence this while babies died?! This isn’t oversight — it’s a full-blown CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY playing out in a Canadian police hearing! 🔥🔥🔥 My blood is literally boiling! WAKE UP CANADA & WORLD — share this before they bury it deeper! Demand answers and justice for these babies NOW! #PfizerGenocide #JusticeForGrus #BabyLivesMatter #VaccineHolocaust #HoldThemAccountable #DrMargaretShowExposed 🔥❤️

@DrMargaretShow Disgusting. It's a horror show. Shine the light on all this darkness.

Climate Models Are Built on a Flat Earth Science. And That's a Big Problem academia.edu/166150148/Clim… via @academia

This isn't just a pile of debris - it’s the future of green energy waste hidden in plain sight. Millions of solar panels are hitting their end-of-life cycle, and the world is completely unprepared for the coming toxic avalanche. By 2050, the International Renewable Energy Agency projects up to 78 million metric tons of solar e-waste. Where is it all going to go? The industry boasts that solar panels are '95% recyclable'. Technically, yes - because they are made of glass, aluminum and copper. But economics always trumps physics. In Australia and the US, it costs roughly $20 to $28 to properly disassemble and recycle a single panel, but only about $4 to dump it in landfill. Because there is no financial incentive, up to 90% of decommissioned panels go straight into the ground. Each solar panel is an industrial 'sandwich' bound tightly by heavy polymers. To extract the microscopic amounts of valuable silver and high-purity silicon requires energy-intensive chemical and thermal baking. When they are crushed or left to fracture in landfills, heavy metals like lead and cadmium can leach into the surrounding soil and groundwater, turning 'clean energy' into a multi-generational hazardous waste problem. The crisis is accelerating faster than models predicted. Because solar cells degrade and lose efficiency, and because newer, cheaper panels hit the market, consumers and solar farms are ripping out functional systems at least a decade early to upgrade. This compressed lifecycle destroys the narrative of a long-term, stable asset and creates an endless loop of unrecyclable industrial trash.

“GOOD RIDDANCE! After 15 years of Dumocrats promising that “Climate Change” is going to destroy the Planet, the United Nations TOP Climate Committee just admitted that its own projections (RCP8.5) were WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!” - President DONALD J. TRUMP 🇺🇸

Let's take a look at "Modern Germany". Ahmad lives with his 2 wives and 6 children in a taxpayer funded house. He says he's looking for 2 more wives and wants to have 20 children. Ahmad is illiterate and does not work.

@gnh_Eastwall So apt

A modern Irish anthem Listen to that with a little bit of volume and share it to everyone, #VoteNoconfidence

@dejanirasilveir O sea que la agenda 2030 de la ONU sobre el cambio climático y las energías solares y eólicas fueron pura mentira y que también incluyeron la no discriminación e inclusión de la agenda woke?😠

@VelvetShireo7o1 @benonwine @Pipsqueak1979 Have you been to an abbatoir lately? Tell me then what Kosher is.

@benonwine Insanely cruel.

We found another headquarters for the Canadian Climate Institute, registered at 192 Spadina Ave., Suite 316, in Toronto. This “charity” received $30,000,000 from the federal government, yet CRA filings show zero dollars allocated to charity work. It’s exactly as we expected. 🎥 credit: @KloetMichelle. Give her a hand everyone.

Andy Lee @RealAndyLeeShow

2 years ago

“Yes? Is this the federal government of Canada? Yes. This is the Canadian Climate Institute. You can just mail our $30,000,000 cheque to this location. Bobcaygeon. That's right. No, no - it's not a cottage. It's a chalet. Thank you for your donation.”

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

237 3K 5K 1.6M 263

It's maybe the greatest weekend in modern Iranian history. All the worst people in the world are crying. The rest of us celebrate.

actionbutton.nationbuilder.com/share/SPK-QEZD…

If you need a laugh, read the replies to this Canadian op-ed notthebee.com/article/if-you… via @Not_the_Bee

🚨 FREE SPEECH UNDER THREAT IN CANADA A Western government is now openly talking about restricting access to foreign platforms because citizens are speaking in ways the authorities don’t like. When governments decide which opinions are acceptable… when they label dissent as “harm”… when they frame speech itself as a security threat… That is not protection. That is control. The moment a state claims the power to decide what its population is allowed to hear, read, or say — democracy itself is weakened. Citizens raising concerns about immigration, culture, or national identity are not criminals. They are participants in public debate. Free societies do not silence disagreement. They tolerate it — even when it is uncomfortable. Because once censorship begins, it never stays limited to one issue. The real question now is simple: Who decides what is “acceptable speech” — the people, or the government?