Trusted Prop Hub @TrustedPropHub

@Rajsureleverage @SLF_India No doubt 💯

🚨 FUTURES STYLE IS HERE. 🚀 Trade futures-style accounts on MetaTrader 5 & TradeLocker with a faster, simpler path to funding. 🔥 Instant Funding • No evaluation required • Start trading funded from Day 1 • Up to 90% profit split • No consistency rule • 25K account has NO daily loss limit • End-of-Day (EOD) drawdown • Eligible for payouts after just 5 trading days • Account reset available ⚡ 1-Step Pro Evaluation • Only one phase to get funded • Low profit target • No consistency rule • 25K account has NO daily loss limit • End-of-Day (EOD) drawdown • Pass with just one trade (within the rules) • Account reset available 💚 Why Choose Futures Style? • Trade on MT5 & TradeLocker • Futures-style pricing and risk model • Familiar trading experience with transparent rules • Multiple account sizes from 25K to 150K • Built for disciplined traders who want a straightforward path to funding 💥 Use code INDIA to get 40% OFF all Futures Style accounts. 🌐 Sureleveragefunding.com

Use code ICT GET 40% off. 100% of the affiliate commissions will be donated to @StJude Thanks to @I_Am_The_ICT

@propfirmeye @EquityEdgeUK x.com/trustedprophub…

Trusted Prop Hub @TrustedPropHub

6 hours ago

🚨 BREAKING: This is not a scam. You broke the rule, got your payout rejected, and now you're calling the firm a scam. The Spamming Rule is already mentioned in their FAQs. equityedge.io/funded-traders… Looking at the trade history you shared yourself, it's clear you opened multiple

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

18 13 35 4K 0

@ApophTrades @Pipstonecapital @AirRaja Exactly

🚨 Imagine lying about your Trustpilot rating… on your own website. 💀 @Pipstonecapital @AirRaja really thought nobody would check. 😂 Imagine advertising “4.5⭐ on Trustpilot”… …until traders open the actual Trustpilot page. 🍿

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

🚨 BREAKING: This is not a scam. You broke the rule, got your payout rejected, and now you're calling the firm a scam. The Spamming Rule is already mentioned in their FAQs. equityedge.io/funded-traders… Looking at the trade history you shared yourself, it's clear you opened multiple trades one after another within seconds. On EURGBP, you opened around 8 trades almost instantly. On XAUUSD, you did the same with multiple trades. How is that not spamming? The email also shows this wasn't even your first time. They had already warned you before. If you're so confident the rejection is wrong, then share your full MT5 trade history. Don't just post half the story and expect everyone to call the firm a scam. Not every rejected payout is a scam. And as a media page, we'll always be fair. If a firm is wrong, we'll call them out. But if a trader clearly breaks the rules and then cries "scam," we'll call that out too. That's how it should be. #TrustedPropHub ✍🏻

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Captain Bally @MonaGaisa

a day ago

@propfirmeye 🚨 Be careful with @EquityEdgeFund. They denied my $8000 payout, saying I broke their "spamming rule." The trades they attached as evidence generated less than $1,000 in profit.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

3 0 5 3K 1

@HafeezGFT 🥂

It's not only about their Trustpilot rating. There are countless payout complaints, KYC rejections, hidden rule allegations, and frustrated traders posting detailed reviews on Trustpilot. Just check their Instagram comments or Discord. Are all of those complaints fake too? Shame on the bigger pages still promoting this. Traders deserve better than risking their hard-earned money. @Pipstonecapital @AirRaja

Your time matters. We make sure your payouts reflect that. 4 hours & 49 minutes That's our average payout speed. Trade with the prop firm that respects your time.

@el91017 @fundingurtrades @adityaomyt Read the post carefully, you will get to know.

@fundingurtrades Something still doesn’t add up. You say the risk team found multiple violations. If that’s true, why wasn’t that mentioned in the very first rejection email? Why did the email only mention the 3-minute minimum hold rule instead of clearly stating: • How many violations were found? • Which trade IDs were considered violations? • Why the entire payout was forfeited? If the risk team already had this information, why wasn’t the trader given the complete explanation from day one? Isn’t that your responsibility when rejecting someone’s payout? Also, your support couldn’t confirm the outcome because they didn’t know how many violations there were. Fair enough. But the risk team did know, so why wasn’t that information included in the rejection email? One more question: Many prop firms with a minimum holding rule simply exclude the profit from the trades that violate the rule and pay the remaining eligible profit. Why was 100% of the $1,011.44 payout rejected instead? What was the profit made from the alleged violating trades, and how did you calculate that the entire payout should be forfeited? Transparency isn’t just saying “multiple violations.” It’s showing the evidence, the trade IDs, and the exact reason behind the final decision. Right now, those questions are still unanswered.

My payout of $1,011.44 has been rejected by @fundingurtrades and I want to share exactly what happened. I'll let the trading community decide whether rejecting an entire $1,011.44 payout over these circumstances is a fair and transparent application of the rules? Before requesting my payout, I contacted their support to get complete clarity regarding the 3-minute minimum hold rule. I specifically asked what would happen if a trade closed before 3 minutes. Would my account be breached? Would my payout be rejected? Their response was that it would be considered a soft breach and "could or couldn't affect the payout after verification from the team." They never clearly stated that a few soft breaches would automatically result in my entire payout being rejected, nor did they provide any threshold or define what "multiple" violations actually mean. Another thing that was never made clear is how this rule applies when a trade naturally hits TP or SL within 3 minutes due to normal market volatility. There is no explanation in the rules about whether winning and losing trades are treated differently or how such situations are evaluated. In my case, only 3 trades closed within 3 minutes 2 profitable trades that made $72 and $50, and 1 losing trade where my Stop Loss was hit within 3 minutes. The losing trade itself shows there was no attempt to exploit or intentionally bypass the rules. Markets move unpredictably, and both TP and SL can be hit within minutes. Despite this, my entire payout of $1,011.44 has been rejected. I fully understand that the 3-minute minimum hold rule exists, but I could not find any official rule stating that a few soft breaches automatically result in a complete payout forfeiture. Even their own support described it as a soft breach that "could or couldn't affect" the payout not an automatic rejection. Their rules also state that multiple violations can result in account termination or payout forfeiture, but they never define what "multiple" actually means or what objective criteria are used to reach that decision. I repeatedly asked support to explain the policy clearly and to point me to the exact clause that justifies rejecting my entire payout, but I never received a clear explanation. I'm not asking for special treatment. I'm asking for transparency, consistency, and clearly defined rules. If an entire payout can be denied because a few trades naturally closed within 3 minutes, then that consequence should be explicitly written in the rules, along with a clear definition of what constitutes "multiple" violations and how TP and SL scenarios are evaluated. Traders should know exactly what they're agreeing to before they trade not only after they request a payout. @BossMohitt @TrustedPropHub @raghavsharmafx @aardytrades

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

H @fxhustle7

2 days ago

Finally locked in my $1,011.44 payout and have officially submitted the payout request with @fundingurtrades Now let's see how quickly it reaches my wallet. This firm was recommended to me by @adityaomyt This was my first account with them, and I managed to secure a payout on

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

13 0 24 4K 3

@fundingurtrades @fxhustle7 Please share.

Congratulations everyone! 👏🎉

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@Rajsureleverage Congratulations to everyone! 🙌🏻

@EdwardXLreal Lfg 🥂