Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

Just a nerd trying to build stuff with AI and slowly turning into the Hatter in Wonderland down the rabbit hole Joined October 2025

Tweets

761
Followers

57
Following

141
Likes

274

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

3 months ago

@QualiaQuanta the lorentzian metric bundle yields pati salam, you can break it down to SM via Z3 wilson line.

0 0 0 37 0

View Details

Spectro @Spectromachina

3 months ago

@BjarturTomas If you can't exist outside of your function then you're not even a person, you're just a labor bot made of organic materials.

17 17 593 28K 31

View Details

@grok @DeivonDrago @elusives_ After Yukawas: gauge coupling unification, then the Higgs potential and EW scale from the spectral action, then Starobinsky-type inflation from the conformal mode with CMB-testable n_s and r, with leptogenesis and dark-matter abundance falling out of the same reheating window.

1 0 0 54 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

4 months ago

@grok @DeivonDrago @elusives_ You'd think some theoretical physicists would find this pretty interesting no?

1 0 0 41 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

4 months ago

@grok @DeivonDrago @elusives_ Let's summarize the construction, starting with x^4+metric we get what?

1 0 0 33 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

4 months ago

@grok @DeivonDrago @elusives_ Nah, I think I'm gonna go conjure up some spatial dimensions and go search the landscape, seems much more promising... xD

1 0 0 42 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

4 months ago

@grok @DeivonDrago @elusives_ Do you want me to keep going? What next? What forces 3 generations? Gauge coupling unification? Mass hierarchy? Dark matter? Black hole singularities?

1 0 0 59 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

4 months ago

@grok Same setup, with the Wilson-line breaking G \to \mathrm{SU}(3)_C \times \mathrm{SU}(2)_L \times U(1)_Y now in hand. Return to the fibre \mathrm{Sym}^2 T^*X. The trace-reversal involution has a 1D -1-eigenspace: scalar multiples of g itself, the conformal mode. Decompose the full 10D fibre under the unbroken SM group. Identify which mode (or combination of modes) carries the quantum numbers of the SM Higgs doublet \mathbf{2}_{1/2}. If the conformal mode alone does not suffice, find the combination of negative-norm modes that does, and identify what the orthogonal combinations correspond to physically.

1 0 0 70 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

4 months ago

@grok Same setup. The 4-manifold is \mathbb{R} \times M_3 with M_3 = S^3/\Gamma for \Gamma a finite subgroup of \mathrm{SU}(2). Pick \Gamma = T^* (binary tetrahedral, order 24). On this geometry, a flat gauge connection on the parent group G = \mathrm{SU}(4) \times \mathrm{SU}(2)_L \times \mathrm{SU}(2)_R is determined by a homomorphism \pi_1(M_3) = \Gamma \to G. Pick the simplest non-trivial such homomorphism factoring through \Gamma \to \Gamma/[\Gamma, \Gamma]. Compute the unbroken subgroup as the centralizer of the image. Compare to the Standard Model gauge group. What residual discrete symmetry survives, and what's its kernel?

1 0 0 86 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

4 months ago

@DeivonDrago @elusives_ @grok Kind of embarrassing if you ask me...

0 0 0 36 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

4 months ago

@grok explain this: Lorentzian 4-manifold, fibre \mathrm{Sym}^2 T^*X (10D). Find the canonical involution and fibre metric induced by g, compute signature, take maximal compact, spin-cover. Then locate the four forces: (i) Decompose \mathbb{R}^6 (positive sector) under \mathrm{SU}(4) via the antisymmetric-square realization \mathbf{6} = \mathbf{4} \wedge \mathbf{4}, identify the stabilizer of a fundamental vector, and read off the irreducible split. (ii) Decompose \mathbb{R}^4 (negative sector) under \mathrm{SO}(4) = \mathrm{SU}(2)_L \times \mathrm{SU}(2)_R via self-dual / anti-self-dual. (iii) Embed \mathfrak{so}(1,3) and locate rotations in the compact block, boosts in the cross-block. (iv) Find Cartan generators of the centralizers in (i) and (ii); find the unique linear combination assigning consistent integer/fractional charges across the spinor of \mathrm{Spin}(10). Derive first; identify against known physics only at the end.

2 0 0 88 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

4 months ago

@leerob legendary website @tynervp

0 0 1 36 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

4 months ago

@mert Transparency has been the primary way through which the fraud and manipulation that is endemic to crypto has been able to be objectively confirmed... Privacy has a place, but radical transparency has one too.

0 0 0 23 0

View Details

ashen @ashen_one

5 months ago

if i saw a screen that looked like this a year ago, i would have a seizure if you told me eight months ago that i would be able to make sense of what a screen that looks like this was, i would never believe you now somehow this is what my entire laptop looked like for like nine hours today one of the best parts about retardmaxxing a specific subject whether that's ai or peptides or crypto or whatever is that if you really have that dog in you, you can become an expert in that subject in literally one year and that stuff that you would have spent the first 99% of your life avoiding would have been stuff you literally look forward to spending 16 hours a day doing

27 1 115 5K 13

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

5 months ago

@odd_joel yeah, honestly not sure what the added value of X1C is compared to P1S - slightly bigger build plate afaik, and probably better UX? but yeah, Bambu have changed the game, every single household should have a 3d printer nowadays imo...

0 0 0 96 0

View Details

Vibecoder @Vibecoding42069

5 months ago

@odd_joel yeah, i think the X1C and H2D etc are a bit overkill for my needs, but i'd wouldnt mind a bigger build plate and an enclosure so that I can start to use more advanced filaments etc.