WackyMain @WackyMain86

@RollinRiches_ @HashMarket2026

giving away 1 sol in 24 hours Like and repost tag 1 friend gl

I'm excited to announce my new partnership with @juicedotgg! 🧃💚 To celebrate, I am giving away $100 to 3 lucky winners! How to enter: ✅ RT this post ✅ Use code "snatch" or click the link below 👇 🔗juice.gg/r/snatch Rolling in 7 days!⏰

@Kirgo @HashMarket2026

🚨 𝐆𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐀𝐖𝐀𝐘 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄 🚨 $100 Straight to your Kirgo Account! 💰 𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗢 𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥 ⬇️ - Follow @Kirgo - Like this Post - RT this Post - Tag 1 Friend Picking winner in 24 hours #GOODLUCK

🧪 $100 Mutant Labs Giveaway! 🧪 Our debut "Multi Mines" is releasing very soon! ✅ Follow @mutantlabsgg ✅ Like + Retweet Rolling in 7 days!

Mutant Labs @mutantlabsgg

2 weeks ago

Coming soon 👀

35 263 302 35K 2

@yungreal69 @HashMarket2026

I’m giving away 1 SOL to one lucky winner! 🚀 How to enter: Like & Retweet this post. Tag 1 friend Winner picked in 9 hours!

Tech stocks are experiencing one of their most volatile periods in history: The ratio of the Nasdaq 100 volatility index, $VXN, to the S&P 500 volatility index, $VIX, is up to 1.7 points, the highest in 23 years. This marks the first time since 2018 that the ratio has surpassed 1.5 points. By comparison, during the 2008 Financial Crisis, this metric peaked at ~1.6 points. This comes as $VXN stands at 28 points while the $VIX is at 16 points, or 43% lower. $VXN has now been above 20 points for 5 consecutive months, the longest streak since the 2022 bear market. The market is pricing-in severe volatility in tech.

🎉 $50 CASH GIVEAWAY 🎉 We're giving ONE person $50 CASH, to enter: • Like this post • Follow @ShockedDeals • Reply with "DONE" Winner picked in 24 hours from now

@ShockedDeals DONE

🎁$100 GIVEAWAY💙 To enter: ✅Retweet & Like, ✅Follow: @rgLyCS, @casesdotgg, ✅Tag a friend. 🍀Good Luck! ⏰Ends in 7 days! #CS2 #CS2Giveaway

Cases.gg @casesdotgg

3 weeks ago

☀️🍹 SUMMER EVENT IS LIVE! 🍹☀️ Every $10 wagered gives you a Beach Ball to use in our Summer Raffles! 🎫 Raffles run all summer long: Every 30 Minutes ⏰ | Hourly 🕐 | Daily 📅 The more Beach Balls you have, the higher your chances of winning! Good luck, and enjoy the

150 2K 1K 152K 14

@rgLyCS @casesdotgg @HashMarket2026

@KickBrute @rainbetcom @HashMarket2026

Brand New $3,000 Monthly LB just started today on @rainbetcom 🔥 If anyone is looking to come play on Rainbet and wants the following rewards, dm me 😉 • WEEKLY 10% Loss-Back • Wager $500, Receive $25 • Rank Up rewards matched • And so much more $25 to 2 People, Rt & Tag

kirain DuoDERM ini cuma plester luka biasa ternyata di korea malah di jadiin life hack skincare buat jerawat.. btw, lifehack korea emang suka gak masuk akal tapi pas dicoba, bikin susah move on 😭🫶🏻

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Collaboration Giveaway! 🎁 $300, 3x$100 To enter: ✅ like ✅ RT ✅ tag 2 friends! ✅ follow @kickdonnydon6, @Mrnoface7420 @robbinhood22 Rolling winners in 48 hours, good luck! 🤞

@robbinhood22 @kickdonnydon6 @Mrnoface7420 @HashMarket2026 @EzravdStuart

Elon Musk just pulled off the biggest AI power grab of 2026. Tesla is capping every employee at $200 a week on AI spending starting Monday, July 6. Media's celebrating it as cost control. But what Elon actually built is an expense policy that redirects his own engineering workforce off Claude and onto Grok, while every competitor gets throttled by internal procurement rules. Here's what happened: Tesla spent the last six months pushing engineers to use AI as aggressively as possible. Leadership built an internal platform called Bottle Rocket that gave employees access to Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, and Cursor. They gamified adoption by ranking engineers on internal leaderboards by how many AI tokens they consumed. The strategy worked. Software engineers started burning THOUSANDS of dollars a week on Claude and Cursor. Then the invoices arrived and Tesla panicked. But they didn't pull the standard cost-control response... The loophole: The $200 weekly cap does not apply to beta products from xAI. Grok is completely exempt from the cap. Anthropic's Claude, OpenAI's GPT, and Google's Gemini all get throttled at the same $200 line. Four Tesla engineers told Electrek that internal usage overwhelmingly favors Claude over Grok. That preference is about to become financially punishing overnight. The genius part: This quarter SpaceX is closing a $60 billion all-stock acquisition of Anysphere, the parent company of Cursor. The moment that deal closes, Cursor's Composer coding model falls under the same Musk-controlled ecosystem, and any Tesla engineer choosing between a capped Claude session and an uncapped Composer session will pay a financial penalty for using the tool they actually prefer. By exempting only his own products from the cap, Elon is using Tesla shareholder money to build market share for xAI without ever having to disclose that is what he is doing. Because on paper, it is cost control. Now zoom out to what this signals for the wider AI narrative: Uber capped employees at $1,500 a month after burning $3.4 billion in four months. Meta introduced spending caps. Amazon and Walmart pushed staff toward cheaper models. Microsoft canceled Claude Code licenses across 100,000 engineers. Every Fortune 500 that pushed heavy AI adoption in 2025 is now rationing it in 2026. Meanwhile Nvidia is trading at a $5 trillion market cap. That entire valuation assumes enterprise AI consumption is about to explode across the economy. But every company actually deploying AI at scale is telling their own engineers to slow down. One of these narratives is lying. Goldman Sachs still forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030. Gartner says total enterprise AI costs will keep climbing because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task. Jensen Huang keeps repeating that 100 AI agents will work alongside every employee. And now the CEO of the most agentic company on the planet just told his own engineers they cannot spend more than $200 a week on the tools those agents need to run. Retail investors buying Nvidia and Palantir today are betting enterprise AI adoption compounds without limit. The CEOs deploying AI inside those same enterprises are betting the exact opposite, in writing, by internal memo. Thoughts?