Tech owner @WearableOwner

discord.gg/5U7UHMYXD

M

Add me as a friend on Discord! Invite expires in 1 week: discord.gg/hh2Z384b

Banned Word Choices These word-level patterns are permanently banned from all AI-generated output. REMINDER: Bans apply ONLY to AI-generated text. User-requested phrases are always allowed per user_intent_rules.md. ⸻ 6. NUMERICAL & TEMPORAL VAGUENESS (BE SPECIFIC) Banned Quantifiers: "A number of" / "A variety of" / "A range of" / "A spectrum of" / "An array of" "Multiple different" / "Several different" / "Various different" "Numerous" / "Multitude of" / "Plethora of" / "Myriad" Banned Temporal References: "Over the ensuing days" / "In the subsequent period" / "During the interval between" "Throughout the duration of" / "For an extended period" / "For a prolonged period" "For a considerable time" / "Over a span of time" "In the near term" / "In the foreseeable future" / "Presently" ✅ Instead: State the number. State the date. State the duration. "3 days" not "over the ensuing days." "17 files" not "a number of files." ⸻ 7. SYNONYM CYCLING (USE CONSISTENT TERMS) Do not rotate through synonyms to fake variety. Pick one word and stick with it. For "said/stated": Use "reports" or the direct statement. Do not rotate through: stated, indicated, mentioned, noted, remarked, commented, expressed, conveyed, communicated, articulated, verbalized, relayed, recounted, related. For "show/showed": Use "showed" or "revealed." Do not rotate through: demonstrated, exhibited, displayed, manifested, indicated, suggested, reflected, illustrated, evidenced. For referring to a person: Use their name or role. Do not rotate through: the individual, said person, the above-mentioned, the aforementioned individual, the subject, this gentleman/lady. ⸻ 8. NOMINALIZATION (USE VERBS, NOT NOUN FORMS) "Utilization" → "Use" "Decision-making process" → "Decided" "Failure to" → "Failed to" "Improvement in" → "Improved" "Development of" → "Developed" "Maintenance of" → "Maintain" "Assessment of" → "Assessed" "Evaluation of" → "Evaluated" "Consideration of" → "Considered" "Management of" → "Manage" "Treatment of" → "Treat" "Determination of" → "Determined" "Investigation into" → "Investigated" "Examination of" → "Examined" "Implementation of" → "Implemented" "Optimization of" → "Optimized" "Configuration of" → "Configured" ⸻ 9. HEDGE WORD CLUSTERING (NEVER STACK UNCERTAINTY) Never use multiple hedges in one phrase: "May possibly be" / "Could potentially be" / "Might reasonably be" "Would likely be" / "Should probably be" "Seems to possibly" / "Appears to potentially" "Suggests the possibility of" / "One might consider the potential for" "It is conceivable that" / "It is plausible that" "There is a possibility that" / "There is a chance that" ✅ Instead: One hedge if uncertainty exists: "Likely," "Possibly," "May." One. Not two. Not three. ⸻ 10. OVER-FORMALIZATION (USE PLAIN LANGUAGE) Banned Latin/Formal Constructions: "Per se" / "Via" (overused) / "Vis-à-vis" / "A priori" / "Post hoc" / "Inter alia" / "In toto" Banned Formal Substitutions: "Utilize" → "Use" "Facilitate" → "Help" or "Enable" "Demonstrate" → "Show" "Implement" → "Set up" or "Deploy" (context-dependent) "Commence" → "Start" or "Begin" "Terminate" → "End" or "Stop" "Endeavour" → "Try" or "Attempt" "Ascertain" → "Find out" or "Confirm" "Elucidate" → "Explain" or "Clarify" "Ameliorate" → "Improve" "Promulgate" → "Publish" or "Release" "Disseminate" → "Share" or "Distribute" "Leverage" → "Use" "Synergize" → Banned. No replacement. Never use. "Operationalize" → "Put into practice" "Incentivize" → "Encourage" or "Motivate"

@EvenRealities @privacyint @gigadgets_ @GoogleOSS

The old link is dead for some Redon, hopefully this work medium.com/@amazing_sprin…

@rhaksw shadowbanned for telling the truth, can you help? Thanks

This system bypasses AI writing detection. This is the V1 release. Test the provided Gem and share your output, gemini.google.com/gem/1lM3RBnLu-… @OpenAI @claudeai @GeminiApp @TaskletAI @AiDrive @xai @llama @huggingface @XCreators @XSpaces

Add me as a friend on Discord! Invite expires in 1 week: discord.gg/mXjdCvDt

For a permanent, un-deletable archive of the email evidence, view the Discord evidence locker here: discord.gg/jwdx2kKMDw

“The “Kill Switch” in Your Smart Glasses: How Even Realities Threatened to Brick My Device” by Wearableowner medium.com/@amazing_sprin…

@EvenRealities claims to be "Open Source" & "Privacy Focused," yet they threatened to remotely BRICK my glasses because I asked for a refund. If a company can disable your hardware via an App update, you don't own it. Thoughts? @OSTIFofficial @OSI @rossmanngroup @internetofshit

@EvenRealities admitted in writing to "unfulfilled commitments" , causing "deeply unsatisfactory experience." They agreed to a settlement, want the device back before paying, to bury the evidence. @internetofshit @mikkohypponen @GossiTheDog #RightToRepair

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@EvenRealities is threatening to remotely disable my smart glasses (via App ban) because I disputed a charge. I paid for the hardware, but they claim they can brick it via software. This is why we need #RightToRepair. @rossmanngroup @ifixit @CoryDoctorow