DaftAda @ada_daft

@rejserin @AcWailing @jk_rowling @beirasplace The law is an ass

@AngryBritishMum @LBC Performative stupidity! A skill O’Brien has mastered over the years! I’m not sure it’s performative anymore, he is genuinely ignorant! As are his followers. Luckily there isn’t that many of them!

@HorneyMedia @LucyTCWife Lunch Connolly has already suffered her punishment! A ‘pardon’ is pointless. Zack Polanski must be treated by the same standards and the full force of the law!

@daveatherton @HollyEngland25 Good Luck! 🤞

So the 8.32 from Weybridge is cancelled due to a “shortage” of train crew. A shortage? For a job that pays £80K for following a straight line 4 days a week? Hire desperate youngsters at half the price. SWR would be killed in the rush.

@BillboardChris @Acyn All very Soviet !

@Gr3259583458059 @OhBrokenBritain @DaveKent101 @andyburnham Tory austerity? Nobody buys that! 2010-2024 was classic balancing the books after 13 years of Labour boom and bust; plus Covid and Russia/Ukraine war! Labours note said it: ‘There’s no money left’ Classic Labour now Starmer and Burnham continue to bankrupt the country!

Well Andy Burn'em has finally come right out with it. He thinks that homeowners in the South should pay more Council Tax so as to subsidise those in the North. What the self styled 'King of the North' won't tell you is that the reason Council Tax is so high in the North is because of spendthrift Labour councils. The valuations from the 90s will still show Northern homes as being less expensive than those in the South. The only thing that has changed is the rate of Council Tax charged by each council. Burn'em in in no place to lecture anyone on spending money. He has left Manchester in debt to the tune of £1.3 billion.🤨 So go and do one, Burn'em...

Lies? Read the f*cking report you halfwit - we’re talking about FACTS here. It’s all in there - the issue is WORKING AGE HEALTH RELATED BENEFITS - here are the numbers - how about YOU explain why Britain is an outlier compared to other European countries.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

nonconformist 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿💚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @nonconformist73

2 days ago

@AcWailing @alexwickham Welfare spending has been stable since the 80s, stop spreading lies. And other European countries have much fairer benefits systems whilst Britain sits at the bottom. You sir, are a partbof the problem!

0 0 2 331 0

If this government were really serious about Net Zero then why is this new PM we have at the moment flying to Manchester on a private jet costing in excess of £30K when he could easily have got the train. It appears Net Zero is for us but not for them. It’s all one big SCAM

@Goosey30111568 And the leftists keep repeating it, despite it being refuted and explained why it’s such a weak argument !

@astor_charlie I had a dream... 😐

That's because the Home Office is full of muslims whose agenda is the advancement of Islam in Britain.

GB Politics @GBPolitcs

3 days ago

🚨NEW: The Home Office has given the ‘Islamic Centre of England’ powers to sponsor visas for “skilled workers” and religious ministers This charity is an alleged outpost of the Iranian regime in London [@Telegraph]

864 2K 9K 1.5M 883

A Year After The Supreme Court Ruling, Staffordshire Police Force Still Can't Say What Sex Means In April 2025, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that sex under the Equality Act means biological sex. Staffordshire Police read that judgment and then drafted new custody guidance in response to it. The result still commits to housing detainees "consistent with their gender identity" and lets people "self-identify their gender" in force records. This was not a policy written before the law was settled and simply never updated. It was written after, with the ruling fully in view, and it still lands on self-identification as the operating principle. The document's own internal contradiction shows this isn't confusion so much as evasion. One clause states plainly that intimate searches "should be carried out by police officers and staff of the same biological sex as the detained person," a clear, lawful standard. The next section states that a detainee holding a full Gender Recognition Certificate has their "sex" become "that of a woman," directly undercutting the rule stated a few lines earlier. Asked to clarify which version actually governs, the force said a GRC doesn't "automatically" determine the outcome, retreating to "case-by-case" assessment rather than naming a rule at all. That's the same move seen elsewhere in British institutions caught contradicting themselves: state the correct principle, quietly undercut it in the next clause, then hide behind individual circumstances when someone asks which one actually applies. The starkest detail sits in the National Police Chiefs' Council guidance underneath Staffordshire's policy, not in Staffordshire's document itself. It states that an officer who refuses to search someone of the opposite biological sex "will not suffer a detriment to their career." That sentence only needs writing if the institutional default already runs the other way, if officers who decline are the exception requiring formal protection rather than officers who comply. The guidance doesn't protect neutrality. It protects dissent from a presumed norm, which tells you plainly what that norm is. Cathy Larkman, a retired police superintendent now with the Women's Rights Network, called it what it is: a failure that "indicates a level of ignorance with the law and a disregard for the rights of women." Terence Stock, formerly on the force's own Independent Advisory Group, went further, calling the continued use of self-ID "unforgivable" given the Supreme Court's judgment and the plain same-sex requirement already written into the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. Neither of these are outside critics unfamiliar with policing. Both know the institution from within, and both are describing the same thing documented across the CPS, Hampshire, Sussex and Surrey: a written rule stating the correct legal standard, sitting beside operational guidance that quietly does something else. None of this happened in a vacuum. The Equality and Human Rights Commission's code of practice, the document meant to give police forces exactly the clarity Staffordshire's policy lacks, sat with Bridget Phillipson, the minister responsible for issuing it, for eight months before she finally laid it before Parliament in May. Even now, two months on, it still isn't in force. Individual forces have been left to draft their own interpretations in that gap, and Staffordshire shows precisely what fills it when no binding national guidance exists: not caution, but a continuation of self-ID, formalised in a new document that can now be pointed to as evidence of compliance. Staffordshire Police says its officers act "in accordance with applicable legislation, national policing guidance and force policy." All three currently disagree with each other, and the force's own document proves it in a single contradictory paragraph. This wasn't a force struggling with an unclear ruling. It read a clear one and wrote around it. Bridget Phillipson

@Jenny_1884 The electorate have a crystal as well; And we know he’s going to be shit!

@federicotubaro @Gini_220 And 1 at the bottom! 😜

@GemmaAlexa1990 @EssexPR @vivienmiss @ShabanaMahmood @andyburnham @Keir_Starmer Mindless ‘speculation’ Labour politicians are the only ones allied to do it! Everybody else is endangering the legal process!

@benonwine British Citizen Award for what? Most impressive fancy dress?

@AvonandsomerRob Timex!

Deflection. The same reason we were told it was an accident, then a burglary gone wrong. The same reason Starmer & Mahmood concocted a fake story about a far right terror plot in Suffolk and had 12 innocent people arrested. The same reason the msm refer to Ann only as a "former Tory minister" and not as Reform's serving immigration spokesperson. A Reform politician being brutally murdered motivated by left wing political indoctrination drives a bulldozer through the establishment narrative and terrifies them.