Matt @aisle75

... People's Republic of Danistan Joined January 2020

Tweets

934
Followers

386
Following

1K
Likes

52K

Matt @aisle75

4 days ago

@ImBreckWorsham How is she so bad at this? Completely wooden, false, confected and unconvincing.

0 0 0 2 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

3 weeks ago

@FleshyVessel82 @forbiddenmerch @grok If it helps you, "The Bolshevik Revolution: Darkness Descends" is another important and sobering video to watch on this -- currently still available on YT.

1 0 1 23 1

View Details

Matt @aisle75

8 months ago

@mmurph71 @HumanityChad youtube.com/channel/UC4_Ss… this is him...

0 0 4 449 1

View Details

Matt @aisle75

8 months ago

@Eric_Conn @joe_rigney Amen, Eric.

0 0 2 732 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

8 months ago

My daughter reviews the new David movie from @AngelStudiosInc with @philwickham @brandonengman youtu.be/kb8-2gOcaa8?si…

0 0 1 25 0

View Details

@MikeWingerii This is a laughably facile take, Mike. Admitting you don't take the time to investigate things yourself, then pouring scorn on anyone who DOES (as being somehow sinful) is ludicrous, not to mention a clear example of bearing false witness against a brother.

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

9 months ago

@Pete_Hutter @douglaswils 👑

0 0 0 37 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

10 months ago

@PastorMark Nope. This is gross innuendo, slander, concern trolling, misdiagnosis and derision -- where you clearly know almost nothing about the situation (nor anything about Candace, her husband nor her priest). The inorganic, coordinated smear campaign is a massive failure: give up.

0 0 1 20 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

10 months ago

@alisa_childers Is it possible that your friendship with Frank Turek is clouding your judgement here, Alisa? You are usually so careful in your analysis, and so diplomatic in your tone, yet on Candace you’ve seemed to reflexively judge that she is to be dismissed as grifting for clicks, or worse

0 0 5 155 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

10 months ago

@pastorlocke Your comments are utterly abhorrent, baseless and disqualifying. Repent.

0 0 1 12 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

10 months ago

@andrewlawrence @Walkabout24 “Tolerance is the virtue of a man without convictions.” “Modern toleration is really a tyranny. It is a tyranny because it is a silence.” “Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance. .” — GK Chesterton

0 0 0 20 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

11 months ago

@SwampFox8 @NeilShenvi 🔥

0 0 0 46 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

11 months ago

@CO2IsHarmless @presbycast 🔥🔥

0 0 0 21 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

11 months ago

@MikeWingerii @sonofmccheese He must live on the same planet that I do, as I was about to write the same thing. I genuinely love your BibleThinker ministry but I grimace every time you wade in to tone police or counter signal people like @rightresponsem Again, please recognise he is your courageous brother.

0 0 11 65 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

11 months ago

@ConceptualJames • “there are no receipts” • “OK, but the receipts are fake” • “OK, but the receipts were stolen” • “OK, but posting receipts is a new low” • “OK, but posting receipts is grifting” • “OK, but the now 100% real, confirmed receipts don’t mean THAT!” • “EVIL, LYING SNAKE!” 🤡

0 0 0 20 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

11 months ago

@ConceptualJames "Post the receipts or shut up, Candace!" "Wait, you posted receipts? How disgusting! A new low!"

6 3 301 2K 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

11 months ago

@marcminter Excellent point

0 0 0 86 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

11 months ago

@MikeWingerii @rightresponsem Mike, I really appreciate your ministry - it's helpful - but you are wrong about Joel and RRM. He is bold and faithful amidst fierce criticism from without and within the wider Church. Please listen fairly, charitably to what he is saying, and try talking with him as brothers.

0 0 14 491 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

12 months ago

@halfmilerise @rightresponsem This is a worthwhile listen: stone-choir.com/dispensing-wit…

0 0 0 18 0

View Details

Matt @aisle75

a year ago

@PariahCulture @treblewoe My understanding: posting direct quotations from Scripture but attributing them to Luther, which results in non-Protestant respondents rejecting the words because they're apparently Luther's commentary (and therefore false), then revealing that the words are from the Bible.