Dwight Schrute 🔺 @blockchainbeets

Catch up on the latest Avalanche Community Call 🔺 @frostLedger and @eric_lu_sc discussed ACP-285 - optimising the staking reward curve and aligning incentives with network security. The latest ACPs are the first steps in advancing the network's economics, with more to come.

BREAKING: Hyundai completes first stablecoin payments on Avalanche Hyundai Card and Hyundai Motor Company have laid the groundwork for stablecoin payments on Avalanche, completing a successful pilot with Tether and Axiym.

Governance isn't just about voting. It's about shaping how liquidity is allocated across an ecosystem. P33 automates participation in Pharaoh's governance, making it easier to contribute to Avalanche's long-term growth, without actively managing every epoch.

BREAKING: Hyundai moved $20,000 between its US and Mexico units in USDT on Avalanche, settling in seven minutes. Conventional interbank transfers take three to four hours; Hyundai Card ran the pilot with Tether, Ava Labs, and payments firm Axiym for a real intercompany settlement.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

BREAKING: Avalanche sees a net inflow of $367M over the past 30 days to put its total Real World Asset value above $2B for the first time 🔺

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

It’s gonna get spicy 🌶️ Introducing HOT L1s, where each round brings a hotter wing, a tougher question, and a take they may regret later. Only at Avalanche Summit New York. Who do you want to see in the hot seat? Tickets: avalanchesummit.com

The Avalanche Foundation is delighted to support the launch of @AvaxTeam1 Builder Grants 🔺 Building on the success of Mini Grants - which has supported builders across gaming, infrastructure, community tools, and developer tooling - Accelerator Grants offer ecosystem builders up to $30,000 in funding to drive further growth. Projects considered for Accelerator Grants are proposed and voted on by a committee made up of Avalanche team members and community representatives, reflecting the people building and using the ecosystem every day. We look forward to seeing the impact it has on the next generation of builders on Avalanche.

Blockchain makes finance better, easier, safer, and faster. At Summit, @cmoyall of @apolloglobal will tell us how tokenized assets, payments, and wallets can create financial experiences legacy rails cannot match. Tickets: avalanchesummit.com Christine Moy is a Partner and Head of Digital Assets at Apollo, where she leads digital asset innovation across investing, partnerships, and blockchain integration within the firm. Before Apollo, she led J.P. Morgan’s Blockchain program, focusing on digital assets, tokenized payments, and decentralized identity. Come to Summit to hear Christine’s view on where onchain finance actually improves the user experience: assets that keep working until they are used, payments that move more intelligently, and infrastructure built for real businesses and people. Sept 16–17 | New York City

BREAKING: Avalanche C-Chain just hit 80M monthly transactions, marking a 4x increase in 12 months.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Someone sell me a @g1raffe_

@VirtualQuery @Blessed_fore Yes sir

x.com/i/article/2072…

Payments have evolved. And the next evolution is agentic. AI agents are becoming economic participants, and they need infrastructure built for them. Welcome @GoKiteAI, the first agent-focused member of the Avalanche Payments Collective 🔺

The World Cup completely reshaped the volume picture for Prediction Markets. Kalshi and Polymarket, the two largest platforms, recorded over $40 billion in combined monthly trading volume in June, marking a 75% surge from May. Those two giants also captured 78.5% of betting app downloads in June, up from just 6% combined a year earlier. But this isn't a two-horse race. The category is exploding, and there's massive opportunity for new entrants: niche markets, better UX, regional players, and platforms owning categories the giants ignore. This is just the start.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Honored to be at the NYSE today with @carlosDomingo as @Securitize begins trading as $SECZ. Tokenization has grown from concept to powering billions in real-world assets onchain, and now it’s trading on the world's most iconic exchange. This isn't just a milestone for one company, it's validation that the infrastructure layer for tokenized finance is here, it works, and institutions are building on it. The next chapter for capital markets is being written onchain. Congrats to Carlos and the entire team. Tokenize the World.

Securitize @Securitize

2 weeks ago

Securitize is now officially a public company, listed on the @NYSE under the ticker SECZ. Our focus is unchanged: building the regulated infrastructure for the next generation of capital markets. To everyone who helped us get here, thank you. Tokenize the World.

156 221 1K 304K 126

x.com/i/article/2072…

To the Avalanche community: Yes. I've been quiet. Quiet isn't idle. I understand why the two look the same from the outside, and closing that gap is on me. So here's what the quiet actually held. We put forward three ACPs aimed at validator economics and how the network rewards the work of securing itself. We built more precise ways to measure the chain's economic activity, and shared early results. Behind that, we tightened how the team runs day to day. Less visible, but it's why the rest moved, and why it moves faster now. I recognize the frustration, because this work isn't always visible from the outside. But the work happened, and it's happening. I did a poor job telling you what we could. That's my communication failure, not a work failure. I've written a piece that lays out the exact economic reasoning behind the recent proposals and the direction they point, and it goes out with this letter. Now the part I want to be straight about: tokenomics is not a solved problem. Not here, not anywhere. I'm not interested in patches that look good for a cycle and unwind in the next one. I'm interested in fixes that compound. And compounding is slow before it's fast. We're being deliberate about the order. You can't design how a network captures value until you've defined what value it actually produces, and that "what" has been loosely defined across this industry for years. So we started there. Think of it the way an economy tracks more than one number. There's the value produced on the chain, the revenue protocols earn because they build here, which is what our gross chain product metric captures. And there's the value that accrues to the people using it, the activity that exists only because the chain does. We're building measures for both, to see value from enough angles to form a cohesive picture. Measure the "what," then design the "how." Get it backwards and you optimize for the wrong thing. That design could eventually include new transaction types or new primitives at the platform level, conveniences worth paying for. That can only come once measurement tells us what's worth building. How we find the "right" design is by experimenting. Short term, that means taking parameters that have sat as static constants since launch and letting the network set them dynamically, measured and adjusted on purpose, so we can watch how the system responds to small changes. ACP-283 is one example: it's about learning empirically where fees begin to dampen on-chain activity, so the network can stay well below that line instead of guessing at it with a number set years ago. Everyone contributes here. Validators decide whether these changes activate, and where the fee floor sits over time. My job is to make the case in the open and show the work, not hand down an answer. I'll also be honest about the limits. There's only so much we can test without risking the robustness of the chain, which is exactly why these initial changes are small. Every data point we can gather safely matters. Each one is a hint about whether the long-term design holds, or whether it's time to go back to the drawing board. The answer won't be identical for every chain. It can't be. But the process I trust is the same everywhere: measure honestly, design deliberately, ship, observe, adjust. I know patience is thin and the doubt is real. I'm not going to narrate it back to you; you and I both live in it. What I'll say is that my confidence comes from the work I see every day, from people who could be somewhere easier and aren't. They stay because the hard problems are the ones worth staying for. One thing I want understood because it's the whole point. In proof of stake, security isn't a feature you ship. It's a bill an attacker has to pay, denominated in the network's own token. The economic weight behind that token isn't incidental to security. It *is* the security. And it sets a ceiling: no serious institution settles more value on a chain than it would cost to compromise it, because past that line the attack stops being a tail risk and becomes a trade. Getting the economics right is what keeps that ceiling above the value the chain carries, even as that value grows. That's not a vanity exercise. That's the work, and it's why I prioritize it. So yes, AVAX matters. On communication: you'll see the detail behind the ACPs and the metrics, not just letters like this one. Hold me to that. I came here to be a compounding force in this ecosystem. That's a slow way to start and a hard one to stop 🔺

Matias @frostLedger

2 weeks ago

x.com/i/article/2072…

11 43 138 44K 22

BREAKING: Avalanche RWA Value reaches $1.9B after a 16% increase over the past 30 days 🔺

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Have you tried Bob's Petroleum yet? ⛽ If not, you're missing out. The gameplay, mechanics, and atmosphere are seriously great. And while you're in-game... don't forget to stop by Pangolin. 🔺 We love @TheGrottoL1 we love $BOB 💛

The demand is there! @YourGrails beta opened up for 3 hours yesterday and generated more fees than Beezie and Phygitals over the their full 24 hour period. Imagine when this platform gets fully going? People love the cards!