CF NP @cargo2016

Joined October 2015

Tweets

8K
Followers

280
Following

737
Likes

161K

CF NP @cargo2016

6 hours ago

@CyberGreen09 Show proof please. Anyone can post a video and say literally anything about it.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

5 days ago

@TomWetzel15 @HatsOffff Glory to the resistance, fucktard.

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

@kalyx2020 @______Joel____ @infolibnews It’s called resistance, asswipe. It’s what happens when you plow through a region causing chaos, upheaval and destruction to try to control it. Eventually they fight back.

0 0 2 49 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

a week ago

@Villgecrazylady It’s just theater. That’s why.

0 0 0 2 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

a week ago

@ggreenwald Politricks.

0 0 0 4 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

a week ago

@WhiteHouse You all sound like a bunch of paranoid psychos.

0 0 0 1 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

2 weeks ago

@StateDept Is he on crack? USA can’t even hear the word socialism without hyperventilating.

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

2 weeks ago

@MarkGoldfeder @AOC Liar.

0 0 0 5 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

2 weeks ago

@Ringham7 @swilkinsonbc @marcorubio @gaza @hamas There are no “two sides,” filth. You expect Palestinians to roll over, die, suffer violent occupation and to be kicked out of generational land and homes without resistance. Fuck all the way off with that nonsense.

0 0 9 80 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

2 weeks ago

@swilkinsonbc So much pain.

0 0 1 13 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

2 weeks ago

@DLMitchell3 @ggreenwald @VanJones68 You’re an idiot.

0 0 0 21 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

2 weeks ago

@ireallyhateu2 Filthy talk from a filthy person. Also, she is seething with envy.

0 0 0 45 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

2 weeks ago

@MaxBlumenthal @wyattreed13 @piersmorgan Max is the GOAT

0 0 0 14 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

2 weeks ago

@adamemedia1 It stops creativity, production, growth and creation. A few create and the rest are just slaves.

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

CF NP @cargo2016

2 weeks ago

@s_m_marandi This enrages me to no end.

0 0 0 4 0

View Details

Sony Thăng @nxt888

2 weeks ago

"Both sides have committed atrocities." This sentence is used to achieve one thing: equivalence. If both sides have committed atrocities, then there is no aggressor. If there is no aggressor, there is no victim. If there is no victim, there is no crime. If there is no crime, there is no accountability. "Both sides" takes a situation with a history, with a power differential, with a military budget on one side that exceeds the GDP of the other, with an occupying power and an occupied population, and flattens it into a symmetric conflict between two equally culpable parties. It sounds like balance. It is the elimination of context presented as fairness. The person who breaks into your home and the person defending their home have not both committed equivalent acts by the fact of violence being present on both sides. "Both sides" is what you say when you know who the aggressor is and have decided that saying so would be inconvenient.