Cloneristic @cloneristic

Fantabulous lifehack entailed here to live like an absolute kang getting the best part of having a gf and better yet several but even betterer with almost zero of the costs or downsides. Casual sex is the greatest invention the male mind has ever conceived of and while it is still legal I would recommend it fully. It is the smoking crack of the romance world and once you've rode that dragon into the sun you will never look at wifejak slaveshacks the same ever again. You too can have multiple women obsessed with you and do whatever you want with and to them while fucking other ones on top of it which only makes them more obsessed and fuck you harder with more extreme tricks pulled to win your good graces. This will be some poor bastards future wife someday who will be allowed none of these privileges and in fact will get constantly bitched at for just about everything and chastised for being porn brained because he jacks off sometimes to supplement his dead bedroom. But that is absolutely not your problem, in fact you are creating that problem for him and it feels absolutely AMAZING. If you have never experienced women in this mode you do not know what women even are. It is really the only mode where they are unambiguously good and live to selflessly please like dream girl porn star extraordinaires, they are like the mermaid sluts in Peter Pan's Neverland grotto, just pure pleasure, no bitter aftertaste no chaser needed. Every nagging bitch wife was this at one point probably for someone else, it's their true peak foidly performance only seen in youth or right after the divorce. All you have to do to live in this glorious twilight zone forever is never capitulate to bf or husband rules and you are basically a living God as far as women are concerned, they will worship the ground you walk on and trip over themselves to fill your fat, greasy gullet with as much fatness and grease as it can possibly handle until they hit you with another extra dollop for insult to injury. Any man that is experiencing women any other way is stone cold stupid, they must have been dropped on their head as a baby, woke up, and dove bombed down again for seconds. The best things in life are 100% free, the minute you start paying for anything the universe punishes you by taking it away and making it cost more next time until you are paying just to pay, until you are giving Diane Yap cash app payments to "increase her power" for non sexual dm's, that is the end result and logical conclusion of ever having any kind of sex that is not casual. Casual sex is the only sex and I don't know why anyone would ever think otherwise. The antonyms of casual include: formal, stiff, deliberate, planned, careful, serious, strict, and professional. Do any of those things sound remotely enjoyable in relation to sex or in relation to anything? Of course they don't, so why in God's name would you ever have sex that was any of those things? That is the square you are trying to circle following fake relationship rules randomly inserting an absurdist solemnity to your 32nd body. This is wholly against the spirit of the thing and the concept of sex itself will harshly demerit you for dirtying it with your ridiculous trifles. We suffer because we take seriously what the Gods made for fun. Sex is for fun, its not a job or a grindset mindset or a solemn duty or a bitter sacrifice wifejak makes to make money pop out of you. Claims to the contrary have ulterior motives, you are now haggling at the stingy scam artist bazaar trying to pay for what is free and can't be transferred. Women are correct to feel disgust at you for doing that, whether it is your wife or a streetwalking prosti or anyone. You do not get sex for doing anything else, it just is. If you invited your friend to a party at your house but then charged them for admission to make a profit it would demean the value of the invite and the nature of the festivity, it would ruin it, just as if they volunteered to pay for it would do the same. So the entire concept of tit for tat exchange in relation to sex is completely wrong, and yes this includes: committing to women, paying their bills, doing your chores, meeting their mom, walking their dog, marrying them, helping them through chemo, saving them from a fire, giving them your kidney, etc. It doesn't matter WHAT it is, because that is not what sex is. Sex is fun. It is a spontaneous festival of celebrating being alive as a sexual being. This is why women will not flinch to do their dirtiest deed with a random guy they just met 10 minutes ago but make some loser grovel for pussy crumbs after being married for 20 years. SEX IS FREE. You do not do things to get it. That is a non sequitur and tantamount to prostitution. If prostitution is what you seek, you are better off with a prostitute who will do that JOB much better. This is actually a eureka moment for me that has solved this db discourse and the alpha fuck beta bucks question and the whole thing. The answer is so simple and was there all the time. It is simply: all sex is casual. Women say otherwise because they don't know what words mean, they just throw random words at you until you do what they want. I repeat: all sex is casual. If you try to make it anything else, you will lose. You will be driving a car engine with sand fuel. I hope this is a big load off for everyone, because you have been mind wrapped with foidly word games and seemingly perverse incentives women have set up for you. Now that you know the secret you are free. The riddle is solved, as are women. The pressure is off, and the burdens are gone. If you ignore the yapping, you won't have to be fapping. You can do anything at all.

Romy @Romy_Holland

a day ago

I know a couple of girls who aren't really casual sex ppl who have become addicted to guys they're having casual sex with. the sex totally blinds them to the reality of how the guy feels about them and seems to make them incapable of dating other ppl meaningfully. I suspect a

54 14 1K 142K 404

@CaudilloXIV Jerry Seinfeld did it.

@hollowearthterf They have to be. It's all they got. You can't let some Justin Bieber looking pretty boy gaylord hog up all the pussy. You can't beat him in a beauty contest but maybe you can just beat him.

Let's say a prayer for your future wife anon. She is face down ass up in the dating app dicksuck mines right now. Getting absolutely railed and ravaged. All on a journey to find YOU! Isn't that special? Isn't it grand? She did it all for you. It slipped out and she put it back in just in case that dick was The One. If not, oh well. We'll get 'em next time. One of these dicks is gonna be the showstopper. The retirement pole to hang your hat on. Hopefully not TOOO big. Those ones are scary. They really hurt 😢 😭 😭. And not too small, like a little baby pinky. Those ones just tickle. But juuusssst right. A mediumly proportioned daily driver with a reasonably grounded ego to match. The bf zone! That's the ticket. And that's what the game is all about.

Pay Roll Manager Here @UsingLyft

17 hours ago

Notice she never mentioned giving any of them any head

47 19 2K 68K 124

Confirmed straight from the expert, testosterone most intense recreational drug.

katsu @katsuxbt

15 hours ago

Charlie Sheen says a doctor had him on testosterone cream at 40x the dose and it broke him worse than the c*caine “I did a rehab at home, well not a rehab, but there were girls and testosterone cream” “That’s the one thing I didn’t quit. I probably should have stayed on the

69 90 3K 2.1M 847

In the future, I wonder if we'll be able to grow women that are just holes. 3d print them from stemcels or whatever. No brain, just a silicon implant in an empty skull with an AI chip controlling rudimentary movements and respiration. You feed it liquid goyslop through a funnel once every few days and waste is flushed with a specialized vacuum device. Then you can keep your pet foidhole with no troublesome thoughts, complaints, or demands. Like a human vegetable you get to ethically fuck. It took all that time but humanity finally achieved its dream. The perfect woman.

Diane Yap @RealDianeYap

6 hours ago

The fact that you would be willing to do a lot for access to hole does not negate the fact that you just admitted yourself that you’d dump her if you no longer had access. Come on, Wes. How are you so bad at logic. Embarrassing.

2 0 6 2K 0

I've always found the amount of gold digging being rumoured to happen highly overstated, and furthermore not distributed rationally by the women's attractiveness. So you can have absolute dogs being obsessed with moneygrubbing but some Stacy's seemingly indifferent if the guy has some other attribute they're into. Expectations for income/lifestyle seem more set by familial background and the norm for her social milieu. But even that gets pretty squishy. The women probably wish they were getting sugar babed like that but in reality a lot of these girlbosses are ending up majority breadwinners now and the old maids that can't stomach it end up femcelled. In earlier 20's where women are at their mental and physical peak it's even less relevant. Both provider and baller game are niches. You really don't have to be either. Extreme outliers may be able to coast on it, but if you just have a cozy but comfortable middle to upper middle class job I wouldn't bank on this getting you very far alone as opposed to looks and probably more importantly, charisma. The women dead set on you "providing" besides base level adult self sustainment are regularly not the highest quality of women either. A lot of last chance insecure roasties with checkered pasts in there, single moms, or spiritual or actual prostis. That's something to do if you want to to advance your family's agenda or keep your wife out of the workplace so she can have kids and/or not cheat on you. But as a bargaining chip to offer it's a less than ideal frame. Blood in the water the sharks will sniff out. You may find yourself worth more to her someday paying on the cuck state double dip after she already left your sorry ass.

Bronze Age Pervert @bronzeagemantis

6 hours ago

@DBlossius Women do not in fact sexually choose today in the developed world based on money, either “providers” or “ballers” /thread

1 0 27 2K 2

His game is tight. Mastered the aloof nonchalance. Above it all ice breaking comedic timing with subtle negs hidden in pseudo self effacement. Towering over his hoes like a treetop lover. You better hide YOUR bitch when downs Chad comes around.

BIOHACKER.LOOKSMAX @looksmaxxerrr

8 hours ago

Hypergamy manifests even in the mentally disabled.

10 5 56 8K 22

This is a substantially overstated case. The no consequence unfettered hypergamy of the modern west with no fault divorces and no adultery punishment is historically novel, but hunter gatherer sexual practices are quite diverse, both in remaining groups existent today and historically. Female choice being *totally* absent is not really a norm...even among arranged marriage cultures women have large input and veto power in courtship usually more familialy mediated than outright forced. The human "state of nature" is paleolithic style small band societies. Those might capture and rape women of defeated rival tribes, but within the bands, social networks and women being claimed by whatever male stems rape as a primary reproductive strategy, which is risky and can easily cause lethal conflict. One thing that is true is that in the state of nature, there is no such thing as incel classes. Pretty much every male gets a mate and reproduces. The most successful/high status males get a modest boost. A little bit of polygyny (think 2 wives not 6), some dalliances. Upgrading the old wives for younger ones is a major path to excess fecundity. But it's not some lopsided monopoly where all the women fuck the chieftain and the rest get nothing like a gorilla or lion alpha harem. Primitive savages are not stupid enough to accept that, only pathetic moderns are. They would obviously just kill that guy and redistribute the booty booty from there. Any human arrangement to the contrary is a political construction of civilization. As far as intratribal violence over mate competition, this is relevant, and usually the main cause of homicide outside war, though the prevalence varies. Some tribes have weird ideas about this though, believing multiple males can contribute to conceiving a single child, which can stem some of the competition and lead to sharing of resources. A true train runner's jungle paradise. Divorce and serial monogamy does also commonly exist, so don't get too excited about the one wife one life thing, which seems mostly a later invention of civilization and modern religion. What is novel about our time though is the no fault divorce + fully legalized adultery + full liberal sexual license culturally. This is a full on experiment that is not 200 years old, but mere decades. Fun fact, adultery wasn't even fully legal in the state of New York until 2024. Up until then it was an (obviously rarely enforced) misdemeanor punishable by up to 3 months in prison and someone was even charged for it in 2010 in a case of extra marital porking in a public place. So this kind of stuff is a later 20th century into 21st phenomenon having all things being explicitly permitted in a feminist accelerationism Total Cuck State creating incel jihadi mass shooters and dating app looksmaxx Chadlopolies. But radfems and paleotrads alike should not get overly excited gooning themselves into a frenzy imagining the primitive utopia/dystopia of TOTAL RAPE. That's more of a war time luxury.

Othman Mekhloufi @OthmanMekhloufi

14 hours ago

The common myth of “hypergamy” being “natural” or historic is debunked by the reality of violence. In a state of nature, and at all previous civilizational times before the last 200 years, there was either no female mate choice at all or very little of it. This was either due to

24 34 429 23K 167

Islam has become the bad boy antithesis of Western liberalism. There was a lot of animosity to it post 9/11 but that has faded and half the people blame Jews for that now anyway. It's clearly more vital as a faith, it has an active martyr scene, jihadi groups, government capture with real teeth to enforce its tenets. People take it seriously and some are still willing to hunt and kill for sheer disrespect. They will flaunt their women in ninja outfits despite it making people around them uncomfortable. There is the sense it retains masculinity, allowing polygamy in some cases, and centering around a warlord prophet. It was the perfect boogeyman scapegoat for a while, but as people become overtly disgusted with liberalism and similarly feminized seeming Christianity, as the West becomes more brown and the clout of the Jews falls in tandem, I can see it becoming more popular. Especially as Christianity capitulated to the liberalism and secularism it bastard birthed, less of the purposes of religion are fulfilled by it. It doesn't look like a bulwark against anything, against the mindless progression of technological time. So if it is just going to capitulate to everything liberalism does, why even bother? Why not just be a liberal and be done with it? Go for the real thing, not the slimy and groveling apologist trailing 5 years behind evey other degenerate cultural fad. Imo that's approaching its limit of viability, it will have to become something else or it will just die. People are trying to do it on the back of political ideology but that's a bit hollow to have staying power. It's probably viewed as too alien for all but the most wiggerish of whites to ever adopt but a lot of the team lightskins will probably get peeled off on the Islam train. I think even a lot of the more perceptive Christians are being forced to acknowledge that Islam has a far better handle on the woman question presently than what the rest of the Westerners have devolved into. The alleged struggle against barbarism is not really one that people are fighting that much in first world countries...everyone is spoiled af and the boomerist girldad gigabitch reich is clearly in control, to very dubious ends. So if anything, going back towards barbarism is a self evident remedy.

The only thing that can cure male unconditional love is the actual presence of the woman in question. That can easily make the absurdity of it too in your face to deny. That this farcical and trifling figure could ever be worthy of such grandiose notions. The real test is of it is when she's gone. Only way to know for sure is to destroy everything for good. And then keep your fingers crossed you care as little as you'd hoped. It's a big risk. If it was unconditional, you just fucked yourself big time, bucko. Enjoy the rest of your wasted life running from that ghost. It will never happen. You'll be able to mostly stop thinking about it at times. Crowd it out with other things you probably care about less. But it will never really leave you until death. Womp womp bitch n_1,33_@. Better luck next life.

🐻 @woman0fwise

13 hours ago

If men are capable of unconditional love, why does that "love" immediately fade when their wife deny him sex for a week?

63 106 1K 23K 82

The thing is you never know if they're feds or antifas or whatever. AI these days is no joke too. I have got some rather intense propositions I'll probably regret passing up. But once you're out of the anon box you can't really go back in it. Crazy people will be sending unwanted pizza delivery to your mom's house for the rest of your life. That's only worth it, maybe, for substantial amounts of money. Egirls halfway across the world? I dunno man. There's plenty of girls in your own zipcode. And only so far before cybersex is just silly. I used to have that on AOL while laughably underage. A/s/l. It was stupid then and it's stupid now. Though I do dearly appreciate all votes of confidence from the lovely and brave ladies with the finest discerning taste for unsung genius. But even a tablescrap of attention from mere words alone is kind if a monumental W. All of life is just words. It's crazy, but if you put them in the right combination, anything could happen.

@LowIzzatKara @RealDianeYap He should have said his fetish was being ignored so I'd really be trapped. I've had some strange side hustles over the years but probably gonna leave the gay stuff door closed. One of those things you can't really have a price on or you do.

@LowIzzatKara @RealDianeYap I just let it hang. Any kind of response even negative would be providing sexual pleasure to a gay man. He's got you checkmated with that. Only way to win that game is not to play.

Moid's revenge. God's on our side on this one. Don't feel bad, we earned it. 💪

Brisa ⚢ @moid_destr0yer

a day ago

It's so depressing how horrible Nature is to women. Like, it's so easy for a male to fuck a woman and ruin her life, even in consented pregnancies.

197 2K 22K 580K 1K

@SunspotTom Yeah, the women reverse psychologied the middle class patriarchs on this one. A real man works out where he hear's about his wife's boring ass day and has very strong opinions on which way to orient the Ottoman to pull his mental labor weight around here buster.

Tbh as pure practicality...having a lair no one is really allowed in is a W. I don't really gaf what color doilies are in the bathroom or whether the curtains match the drapes. When men live as bachelors they tend towards high efficiency, spartanly minimalist conditions + clustering hobby stuff in the chill spot. I've had "man caves" in houses I lived in where there were no women present at all. The real problem with this is only because women call it a man cave which makes you sound like a widdwle baby boy pwaying with his train set or whatever. It's essentially men being mad women are making fun of them. Managing home decor and basic fung shui is a job perfectly suited to women, that they in any case will care about more than you will. And escaping both women and children is a mental health prerogative of men. I think women have reverse uno psyopped you with this. They actually don't like the man cave so started making fun of it so you would be more invested in the gay shit they worry about and give them more attention being present in the rest of the house. And you totally fell for it lol. The boyim are down bad, as usual.

Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog

18 hours ago

My “man cave” is called my house. I can go anywhere I want in my house and relax. If I want the room to myself for some peace and quiet, I can tell my kids to leave and go somewhere else, and they will obey. The “man cave” is one of the more emasculated inventions of the modern

892 320 8K 874K 401

People crash out when you tell them the gym obsession is a symbolic cope for the impotence of modernity. I think there's plenty of good reasons to do it regardless but this meme is a real distraction into masturbation over what mainly amounts to a pursuit of physical vanity. Lifting by itself doesn't even make you dangerous. Neither does your trifling middle class values jiu jitsu class either if you never had nor would use it. These are perfect examples of Ted Kaczynski's surrogate activities deflecting from the power process when elevated to a store of primary meaning divorced from more practical utility. I don't think you can really just lift yourself out of the nihilistic crisis, or being a cornered wage slave rat in a trap. If that suffices for you than great. But I think this fails even the most cursory analysis.

People on both sides act like patriarchy is this big scary engine of mass rape and torture. That's an entertaining thought, but really it's just being normal and wholesome. There's not much to it. It's like racism that way. The big conspiracy isn't about doing evil, it's just protecting a bubble of safety so higher ideals can be achieved and love has a chance to exist. This stuff was all defeated by poisoning the well with smears that caused people to lose moral confidence in themselves. So they successfully inverted the morality of the situation. People are tempted to then accept this frame and embrace amorality if the alternative is Satanic feminism or diversaworld racial genocide color swaps. But normalization of normality would ultimately have to take rejecting this frame and taking the moral high ground back. The commonness of common sense. White gentiles at least need this abstracted moral high ground to coordinate themselves around shared goals. The instinct was hijacked to destroy them. But now that people can speak freely maybe they can figure it out. Oppressing women isn't really about torturing them, as gratifying as that sounds. It is for men's good yes, they do get a self interest benefit out of it. But motivated exploiters who dgaf get way more out of liberal license. You can even be a full blown pimp 100% legally. So people have this all dead set backwards. The point is as much politically disempowering people vs. the state and vested capital as anything else. Control of women locally is a real form of sovereignty greedy powers would be jealous of. So instead you have "public" ownership (closer to private ownership by the private owners of the state) of women that always remain for rent on the market. It is of course difficult to tell low agency and gullible people they are low agency and gullible, especially if they are inclined to maximum image curating rationalization. But convincing women is the wrong approach. You convince a critical mass of men and the women follow.

It's just as simple as men being willing to slum below serious dating standards to short term or roster, given their indiscriminancy. These PUA guru people are doing the same shit as much as anyone compounding the "problem." There are some mid women, usually younger, who get absurdly gassed up by this...at first. They are like 20 years old getting hit up by loaded guys of much higher status than them, but they haven't learned that doesn't really mean anything yet, and that their appeal to the highest level of guy will soon rapidly depreciate. You can actually watch this arc play out in real time among some of these egirls. They hit the demoralization wall as no real relationships end up resulting from this and they are strung along or played repeatedly. I don't think it takes all that long though. Women into their mid to late 20's know the score plenty already. It's not men's nobility that stops them from doing the exact same shit by any means either. Women are WAY less "hypergamous" then men would be if they had the ability to order the hottest model tier women on demand like dating app doordash. They'd probably become addicted to it totally and just never settle down or become homeless by neglecting all other aspects of life besides doing this monomaniacally. If women were any less nakedly carnal vs. high level attractive men then they are now, then the mediocre ones would probably have even less of a chance. Their sex drives would be too low and most would get rapidly dead bedroomed if they even got their foots in the door. Women's calibration likely has a hidden wisdom to it that men should be lucky for more than they think...if they were much more indiscriminately slutty monogamy would be totally impossible given how indiscriminate men are. So women's hypergamous high standards acts as cuck defense as women aren't sucking off whoever the hell comes around 24/7. Yeah, I guess this makes them vulnerable at times to elite men but again, this is still less than men would be in the inverse scenario. Nature is full of these trade-off mechanisms, and men complain about it from both directions. Women are simultaneously too whorish and too prudish. But it is the way it is because that's the only way it can be. It may be bad, but it could definitely be worse. Men think they want women to be them too by I doubt it. I think they would be brain raped and probably commit mass suicide if that happened. It would at least be a bonobo cuckswap swinger society, fidelity would not exist like it doesn't for gay men. Since lack of loyalty is one of the main things men complain about I doubt they could handle the Bonnie Blue pill they would have to swallow if they got a taste of their own medicine.

Hypergamy Eugenics