CPIPS23 @cpips23

CEO of @cpips23trading 💵💶💷 Trade Less, Win More. Stay humble 🙏🏻 A Veteran 16 years. Go NAVY. A Husband and Father. $TRUF cpips23trading.com Virginia Beach, VA Joined January 2022

Tweets

42K
Followers

2K
Following

3K
Likes

257K

FinancialJuice @financialjuice

7 minutes ago

Iran's IRGC: Any ceasefire breach contradicts Islamabad accord, will halt all ongoing processes

0 2 11 13K 1

View Details

TT3 @TradingThomas3

a hour ago

We all know what is coming by futures open tomorrow

36 16 300 21K 9

View Details

FinancialJuice @financialjuice

3 hours ago

U.S. Central Command: U.S. forces launch further strikes following Iran’s recent commercial ship assault

6 9 47 35K 1

View Details

CPIPS23 @cpips23

3 hours ago

@RealJGBanks this reeks of how btc bottomed. SPY and BTC lower.

1 0 1 33 0

View Details

FinancialJuice @financialjuice

3 hours ago

Explosions heard in Iran's Sirik: State broadcaster IRIB reports

1 9 48 41K 1

View Details

CPIPS23 @cpips23

5 hours ago

@market_sleuth Down. We go.

0 0 0 700 0

View Details

Food for thought as America approaches its 250th birthday. America’s Voter Rolls Are an Economic Issue. The fight over the SAVE Act is not about paperwork. It is about power. Whoever defines the electorate shapes the laws that govern capital, labor, taxes, and risk. A nation that treats citizenship verification as optional is a nation quietly surrendering control over its political and economic future. Americans understand this better than Washington does. Polls consistently show that broad majorities support voter ID and proof of citizenship to register. The public sees what much of the Senate refuses to admit: standards matter. If a country will not defend the integrity of its franchise, it will not defend the integrity of its markets for long. That is why hiding behind Senate procedure is such a weak response. Saying the votes are not there, invoking the filibuster, and pretending there are no consequences for delay is not strategy. It is drift. History is clear enough: when one side treats procedure as sacred and the other treats power as the goal, the side clinging to process usually wakes up too late. Rules do not enforce themselves. Institutions do not save themselves. Political order survives only when leaders are willing to defend it. Investors, of all people, should understand what is at stake. Long-term forecasts do not rest on earnings models alone. They rest on assumptions about political stability, rule of law, and whether private actors will be free to create wealth. Productivity growth and innovation are not socialist constructs. They come from secure property rights, predictable regulation, enforceable contracts, and a culture that treats profit as legitimate. Once the electorate shifts toward permanent dependency, policy shifts with it. A transfer-dependent voting bloc will rationally support redistribution, overregulation, and politicians who see private capital less as a growth engine than as a resource to be harvested. Standards fall first in the civic sphere, then in the economic sphere. New York City is the warning label. It has spent years normalizing a politics in which private capital is viewed with suspicion, landlords and employers are treated as instruments of social policy, and property rights are honored formally while weakened in practice. The result is a de facto communism-lite system: rent distortion, union-dominated budgets, politicized regulation, and an environment in which investment depends less on neutral rules than on proximity to power. If that model spreads nationally, the march toward economic sovereignty will stop before it is complete. America First will be doomed by a political order that rewards distribution over production. As the United States approaches its 250th birthday, that is something worth thinking about. A country that will not defend the standards of citizenship will not long defend the standards that make wealth creation possible. Ambrogio Lorenzetti’s The Effects of Good Government in the City depicts a prosperous, orderly marketplace flourishing under stable rule. Its lesson is as true now as it was in fourteenth-century Siena: political standards and civic discipline are the precondition for economic vitality. When a government loses interest in guarding the franchise and upholding the rules that sustain self-government, the costs do not remain confined to politics. The city declines, the nation weakens, and investors eventually pay the price.

9 36 127 7K 19

View Details

CPIPS23 @cpips23

5 hours ago

@MagnumP0TUS @Remzztrades Won’t be bullish next week either lol

2 0 1 13 0

View Details

CPIPS23 @cpips23

5 hours ago

@SalsaTekila Lower

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

Adam Taggart @adamtaggart

11 hours ago

Pretty much what I've been saying all week 🙂

Bill Maher @billmaher

21 hours ago

The World Cup is at our shores, and all these people are doing us a great service. They are reminding Americans that this place is kind of awesome.

950 4K 33K 1.7M 3K

42 16 285 24K 23

View Details

CPIPS23 @cpips23

5 hours ago

@AlessioTMAD Not looking so hot ☠️

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

CPIPS23 @cpips23

5 hours ago

@BigCheds Yup

0 0 0 11 0

View Details

James E. Thorne @DrJStrategy

11 hours ago

The Clarity Act. The Doomers keep insisting the Clarity Act will never pass, that Team Warren and Dimon will win, and that is the responsible outcome. What they miss is that the real winner in that scenario is not “prudence,” it is China. Just as those who project that voter ID is inherently controversial often ignore the basic issue of who sets the rules of the system, control the game. Many of today’s critics overlook a simple fact: if the US does not set the standards in the crypto and digital-asset world, Beijing will be more than happy to step in. America has a history of turning strategic advantages into self-inflicted wounds, from handing transistor know‑how to allies who became competitors after WWII, to letting semiconductor manufacturing drift offshore. It is now flirting with a repeat in digital finance. The Clarity Act is not about blessing every new token; it is about whether US capital markets and the dollar sit at the centre of the next financial architecture, or end up operating on rails designed somewhere else. Seen through that lens, passing the Clarity Act is less about placating “crypto bros” than about avoiding another quiet own goal in a domain that will shape money, markets, and power for decades.