Frank Illenberger @depth42

Addicted to developing great Mac & iOS productivity software. projectwizards.net Frankfurt, Germany Joined July 2008

Tweets

4K
Followers

559
Following

215
Likes

8K

Frank Illenberger @depth42

a month ago

WWDC is nearing and as a father I have only one modest wish: Apple, please fix the bugs in iOS screen time.

1 0 0 60 0

View Details

Frank Illenberger @depth42

a month ago

@Im_IrushiK

0 0 0 100 0

View Details

Michael Tsai @mjtsai

2 months ago

Leaving CloudKit: mjtsai.com/blog/2026/05/2… #mjtsaiblog

0 1 2 416 0

View Details

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University · arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20617

1K 4K 10K 1.4M 8K

View Details

Swift Language @SwiftLang

3 months ago

Thanks to @compnerd, we have a new Swift XML parser! 🌿 Xylem is pure Swift, zero dependencies, covering SAX, DOM, and XPath 1.0. This is the kind of infrastructure work that helps Swift thrive everywhere! 🎉 forums.swift.org/t/xylem-a-pure…

1 33 257 17K 71

View Details

Frank Illenberger @depth42

4 months ago

@bdkjones I find this architecture reasonable. Object IDs are small integers and CoreData needs to increment the counters within a transaction to be race-safe. You can obtain permanent Ids before saving in a separate transaction. And you can always add an indexed UUID attribute.

0 0 0 183 1

View Details

Frank Illenberger @depth42

4 months ago

@bdkjones This function is your friend if you want to obtain permanent IDs for newly inserted managed objects BEFORE you save the context changes:

0 0 0 197 0

View Details

Frank Illenberger @depth42

4 months ago

@krzyzanowskim I feel you. I’ve been implementing and maintaining a text editor with it for four years now. It is terrible how many crazy workarounds you need to get it production ready.

0 0 0 56 0

View Details

Michael Tsai @mjtsai

5 months ago

Apple XNU: Clutch Scheduler: mjtsai.com/blog/2026/02/0… #mjtsaiblog

0 1 3 450 0

View Details

Antoine v.d. SwiftLee  @twannl

5 months ago

Love this little improvement in Swift, proposal got accepted! github.com/apple/swift-ev…

4 6 107 10K 42

View Details

Sam Rose @samwhoo

6 months ago

StackOverflow graph of questions asked per month. Holy shit.

861 2K 27K 4.7M 3K

View Details

Tom Dörr @tom_doerr

6 months ago

Automates iOS Simulators via Accessibility APIs github.com/cameroncooke/A…

3 24 313 26K 315

View Details

Justin Ryan ᯅ @justinryanio

6 months ago

Apple just filed a patent hinting that Personas in visionOS might soon react to the virtual environment they are in. Rain falls and your Persona gets wet. Lighting shifts and your look changes. Wind blows and your hair moves. Shout out to @PatentlyApple for uncovering it.

45 98 2K 429K 503

View Details

Luis Batalha @luismbat

6 months ago

After rewatching Home Alone, I couldn’t stop wondering: how plausible is the oversleep that leaves Kevin behind? So I wrote a tiny paper and ran the numbers. Merry Christmas! 🎄