helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

hi there! we're helloPOLY (formerly PolyFinda). a dating, events & community app for polyamory, ENM & kink. made in Melbourne. events back soon. hellopoly.co Everywhere Joined December 2016

Tweets

310
Followers

433
Following

732
Likes

286

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

a month ago

helloPOLY is for the people most apps never quite fit. poly, ENM, kink, swinging, solo or partnered, triads, couples exploring, or still figuring it out. room for the shape you actually have. hellopoly.co

0 0 1 150 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

a month ago

this is helloPOLY. a dating and community app built for polyamory, ENM, kink and swinging. you might have known us as PolyFinda. same place, reimagined. no justifying yourself to anyone. hellopoly.co

0 0 0 280 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

4 months ago

Grok: Yes, correct. If we take the map (the diagram shown in PolyFinda’s post) as an accurate representation of a real-life place on Earth, then a human could physically complete the task—crossing each of the seven bridges exactly once—by following the exact route PolyFinda described with the red path.Here’s why it works in that hypothetical real-world scenario:Real rivers (unlike the abstract puzzle diagram) always have a source/headwaters somewhere upstream. At that point the water becomes a trickle or disappears entirely, and the two banks meet as continuous dry land. You can simply walk from one bank to the other without needing (or using) any bridge. The map shows the river channels extending off the edges (left side in the image), with uniform blue water right up to the frame. In real geography, those channels continue upstream beyond what’s drawn. Following one bank upstream (as the red arrows indicate), reaching the source, crossing on land, and returning downstream on the opposite bank gives you a free land connection between two landmasses that the puzzle treats as separated only by water. That extra land crossing (not shown as a bridge on the map) is what makes an Eulerian path possible. You cross every one of the seven depicted bridges exactly once, end on the small island, and never repeat any. This is exactly what PolyFinda outlined: start on the large island, follow the red path, go upstream on the mainland until it becomes dry land at the source, switch banks, head back downstream, and finish with the last bridge.A couple of important real-world caveats (even in this “accurate map” hypothetical):The diagram itself does not show the river narrowing to a trickle or dry land inside the map frame—the blue channels are the same width all the way to the edges. The source would be somewhere off-map upstream. In the actual historic Königsberg location (the Pregel/Pregolya River), the source is roughly 123 km away, so it would be an extremely long walk. But physically, a human with time and the ability to trek along the banks could still do it. PolyFinda’s solution is therefore “correct” under a literal real-world interpretation of the map. It’s a classic lateral-thinking workaround that exploits the fact that the puzzle is a simplified diagram, not the full infinite geography of a real river system. The mathematical puzzle (as Euler solved it) still says it’s impossible if you’re strictly limited to only the land and bridges shown. But your question asks about a human in a real place—and yes, they could.

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

12 months ago

@YellIntoTheWind @Saddog369 @NoContextHumans If you put me on the ground in this situation I can walk across all 7 bridges once without entering the water. This puzzle is solvable in a real life situation without cheating.

1 0 0 57 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

9 months ago

@joeroganhq Julian Assange

0 0 0 53 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

9 months ago

@joeroganhq Steven Greer

0 0 0 22 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

12 months ago

@Saddog369 @NoContextHumans It’s the river Sennarch in Königsberg.

0 0 0 64 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

12 months ago

@Saddog369 @NoContextHumans All rivers have a beginning which can be traversed. Is this factual or hypothetical?

1 0 0 55 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

12 months ago

@Saddog369 @NoContextHumans Which rule is broken?

1 0 0 72 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

12 months ago

Start on the large island and follow the red path. When back on the mainland walk upstream. The river will become a stream, the stream will become a trickle and eventually become dry land. Head back downstream on the opposite bank and then cross the last bridge to end your walk on the small island having crosses all bridges once.

1 1 3 257 1

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

12 months ago

@grok @frankfritz5 @Saddog369 @NoContextHumans Grok is wrong twice now lol.

1 0 0 30 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

12 months ago

@mwmwmw86587312 @Saddog369 @NoContextHumans It is easily solvable without circumnavigation.

0 0 0 107 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

12 months ago

@grok @frankfritz5 @Saddog369 @NoContextHumans Grok is wrong… AGAIN!

1 0 0 30 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

12 months ago

@Saddog369 @NoContextHumans Sorry but no, if you put me on the ground in this situation I can walk across all seven bridges once, without entering the water or jumping or cheating in any way.

0 0 0 41 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

a year ago

@DanielS46581338 @ElonClipsX What does it destroy?

0 0 0 35 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

a year ago

My feeble understanding is that the craft some how warp space/time in front of them and sort of continuously fall into the hole created, which gives an illusion of anti-gravity but it’s not actually anti-gravity. If such an effect was created on the dark side of the Earth the orbit radius would increase over time.

1 0 1 426 0

View Details

helloPOLY @hellopolyapp

a year ago

Correct! But he also assumes the oceans would boil. I suspect it is technically feasible to increase the radius of the earths orbit, given what is currently being disclosed by whistleblowers and insiders about the propulsion mechanisms of ET craft. Also another assumption is that humans currently only exist on Earth. That also may not be the case if ET craft are visiting earth or if humans have already secretly reverse engineered crashed craft, as also appears to be case, according to witness testimony.