Agent Zero @imadshield

@inquirerdotnet Dapat ang tamang tanong ay: "Mayroon ba kayong ebidensya na may kinausap cya isang hitman para ipapatay ang Pangulo?" Malamang ang sagot: "Wala, Your Honor." 🤣

You're still focused on the wording instead of the evidence. I never said Senator Cayetano stopped being impartial. My point is simple. His questions exposed weaknesses in the prosecution's case. Quoting procedural rules doesn't change what the witness admitted. If you think the case is still strong, explain why. Talk about the evidence, not my choice of words.

🚨Did Cayetano Just Dead-End the VP Assassination Plot? Senator Cayetano delivered a brilliant defense during his cross-examination of Attorney Jeremy Lotoc, the BARMM Regional Director for the National Bureau of Investigation. His goal was simple. He wanted to show that the prosecution's charges do not match the actual legal definition of a crime. In criminal law, the state must prove every single part of a specific crime beyond a reasonable doubt to get a conviction. Cayetano used targeted questions to show that Vice President Sara Duterte's remarks lacked the necessary legal ingredients to be called a criminal grave threat. Cayetano focused heavily on the exact words the Vice President used during her televised statement. He forced the court to see that her words depended entirely on a condition. Specifically, she was talking about a hypothetical scenario where she was assassinated first. From a precise legal angle, a threat that depends on the speaker dying first creates a logical contradiction. A person cannot carry out a plot if they are already dead. This means her statement was an emotional warning for self-defense, not a real forward-looking criminal plan. Cayetano also secured a major victory on the official record. Director Lotoc admitted that the NBI found zero verified information about an actual, hired hitman. In serious legal terms, this admission took away the most critical part of the prosecution's case: an overt act. An overt act means the physical, real-world steps required to turn shocking political talk into an immediate, punishable crime. By proving that no real hitman exists, the defense successfully argued that the government is trying to attack a sitting Vice President based only on angry words, rather than a real operational plot. Cayetano then used this lack of evidence to attack the quality of the NBI's paperwork. He highlighted sloppy mistakes, typos, and clerical errors in their official documents. This classic defense tactic achieved two goals at once. To the public, it made the investigation look rushed and politically motivated. To the Senate tribunal, it raised serious doubts about the fairness and carefulness of the government's top investigative agency. Ultimately, the heart of Cayetano's defense strategy was to show that the prosecution is trying to force a square peg into a round hole. They are treating defensive, conditional political speech as a major capital crime. When you strip away the confusing legal talk, the actual evidence is completely missing.

@tokloud

🚨The "Assassination Plot" is a Clumsy Fiction Fabricated She reacted that way because she felt her staff rights were violated and they were harassed. Whatever she said was an emotional response in the heat of the moment, not a planned attack. There was no plan, no timeline, and no evidence that she intended to carry anything out. Her words were political rhetoric, hyperbole, emotional exaggeration, not an actual criminal plan. The claim that there was an assassination plot misrepresents what happened. Building such a serious accusation on an unverified source is both legally and factually weak.

Your argument confuses a standard courtroom with a Senate trial. In a Senate tribunal, a senator judge is legally allowed to aggressively question witnesses to find the truth. When Senator Cayetano uses sharp questions to show that the prosecution has no physical evidence and no actual hitman, he is not showing bias. He is simply doing his job and upholding the law against a weak case. While the Senate rules call this propounding questions, the method of confronting an opponent witness and forcing them to admit major mistakes is the exact definition of a cross examination. Pointing out that the government case has no legal legs to stand on is not delivering a defense. It is exposing a bad prosecution that tried to turn angry words into a fake crime.

🚨Thieves of Humanity🚨 Corrupt politicians forfeit their right to be called human, they steal humanity from the very people they swear to serve. They are the lowest form of life because they choose money over human survival. The death penalty must be mandatory for corruption. When you are corrupt, you deserve to burn in agony, both in this life and the next.

KGarcia @GarciaKit13

9 hours ago

So, makatao pala ang pangungurakot ng mga pulitiko? Exodus 21:24: "Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot."

0 0 1 264 0

@tokloud Kung panahon yan ni Marcos hindi makakalabas yan 🤣

"The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) arrested Mas days after he posted the tweet. The judge ruled that because he was not actively committing a crime at the exact moment of his arrest, the NBI had no legal right to detain him without a warrant issued by a judge." - News update

@tokloud Is he in prison?? Where is he now?? Free

It’s hilarious how you paint the Duterte family as drug lords when real cartels literally put a billion-peso bounty on their heads. If you actually wanted to take out the competition, you’d start at the top, not with street-level peddlers. But hey, aren’t you the same people constantly whining about "why only the small fish?" 🤣 You don’t dismantle a syndicate by targeting the low-level workers, you do it by forced management change at the absolute top. I highly doubt your brain can comprehend this logic, but I already knew that before I started typing. 🤣

🚨My Toys, My Rules🚨 By turning the NBI, DOJ, Ombudsman, etc into your personal political toys, the Jr's administration has completely killed public trust. Most Filipinos now see these top agencies as a joke. You haven't just damaged their integrity, BBM, you have utterly destroyed it for the sake of your own political games.

@tokloud That's propaganda. You know what's a fact? Metro Manila has a much larger population and a far bigger drug problem than Davao City. So imagine how much larger its biggest drug dens could be. 🤣

@Ca2Utol Totoo💯🎯

Trillanes 5th place? VP Sara 7th place??🤣🤣🤣

Pinoytapsilog @pinoyanghang

a day ago

Eto yung survey na figment of imagination. In one word, basura (hindi yung maleta, ha). Pwe!

30 10 78 4K 0

@tokloud Drug lords and pushers are better off dead. They must never be given another chance to victimize a single innocent Filipino soul.

@tokloud You reacted. That's all the proof I needed. Don't deny it. 🤣

Under Article 285 of the Philippine Revised Penal Code, the law penalizes the cold, enduring malice of the mind, not the fleeting, hot ignition of the tongue. Where the accused walks away and the spark of anger dies upon utterance, the flame of criminal intent does not exist.

Rice donation na nga ninanakawan nyo pa! Lupit nyo!

🚨Death Penalty For the Corrupt Bring back the death penalty to the Philippines. Do not fear that corrupt politicians will all be gone, weaponize or abuse the law. Let them. If greedy TRAPOs use execution as a weapon, they will inevitably turn it on each other. Eventually, they will realize that the same blade they swing will be used to cut their own throats. This chaos will trigger a self-cleaning purge. Once the corrupt elite wipe each other out, the system will finally stabilize and function exactly as it should.

anna ｡˚✧ @missjilliam

14 hours ago

walang kunsensya ang mga buwaya 🐊

1 3 13 411 0

@GreaterGutz 🤣

Your self-image fits on a massive tarpaulin, but your project details can fit on a sticky note. Certified TRAPO.🤣

Alex Bonifacio @AlexBNFC

a day ago

Galing ba sa sarili mong bulsa ang pondo na ginamit dito? @risahontiveros

0 23 75 145K 4

This is BS!🤣

Lakay @LakasNgTimog

a day ago

🤔

31 1 25 3K 1