Jorge Memewitz @itzmemewitz

You're looking at 1 token out of thousands that I trade. If I held every token, I wouldn't be making this much. You're looking at the chart AFTER the fact and talking about the ATH. Did you hold it all the way to 750k yourself? How often do you exit at the ATH? How often does it happen that you wanted to exit, but it wasn't enough for you, and in the end you closed at a loss?

I saw payouts today for traders who made CallOuts at $15-40k mcap. I've had no payouts for the second day in a row. I don't know where the line is after which CallOuts stop counting as low cap. If anyone has already looked into this and has data, I'd be glad to hear the results. Right now I'm thinking about what to do. At the very least, I plan to test the CallOut threshold where the stats stay stable and the mcap is higher than now. In principle, around $20-30k mcap I could still make successful CallOuts, and there are even fewer bad tokens there. Growth potential is a bit lower, but I'd still be highlighting good runners early. The entry would just be worse than before. And I'd need to hold a small portion of the tokens so my CallOut stays visible. Like I already said, first and foremost I want the extra payouts - we're all here for the money. We'll see what I can do to stay transparent and still make something.

@a1lon9 , can you please tell me if there will be any clarity on CallOuts? 1. Did you fully remove payouts for good CallOuts made at low market cap, even if followers made money on them? 2. Where is the threshold where a CallOut can actually start paying? 20k? 50k? 200k? 1M? Or only after migration? 3. Does a caller get paid if they called at low cap, held the position, and the token ran to a very high cap? Or did the call itself have to be made at high cap? I think this update is very good for real trenchers, but it has flaws. As I understand it, you took the easy road and just got rid of all the garbage. It would have been better to filter the garbage and tighten control. Instead, you just killed a whole sector where a lot of successful traders work, the ones who look for gems early. I'd be glad to know if I can adapt to the new update or not. At least my followers like that I highlight potentially good tokens, and after extra research they can trade in profit. Low-cap trading is risky and not successful every day, but the risk-reward is huge. Looking forward to your answers.

I think this is a good change. It completely kills me, but I think it's good for the people who follow CallOuts. Honestly, I still don't fully get why they couldn't leave low-cap call payouts as they were, but only pay if the follower made money. One doesn't get in the way of the other. Instead, they killed a whole huge market and made CallOuts pointless for a lot of traders. I think PumpFun just took the easy path. This change solves a lot of the problems CallOuts have had lately. But I wouldn't call it a solution. It's more like avoiding the problem. And problems need to be solved. I also still think paying only if the follower made money isn't right either. You should pay if the follower bought and there was a pump after that. You can't punish the person who made the CallOut because their follower got greedy and didn't sell when they should have. In my ideal version, it would look like this: 1. Low-cap CallOuts stay just as strong. 2. Penalise callers with a low median. 3. Only pay if there was an entry on the CallOut and then a pump. 4. Solve bundling, wash trading and payout manipulation on low caps some other way. I'm sure PumpFun has all the data and the tools to do it. They're just lazy. I didn't get any payout yesterday. Don't know if it's worth continuing.. That's that.

alon @a1lon9

a day ago

We're rolling out a few big changes to the Callout Rewards program over the coming days, starting with today's payout. Here's what to expect: - Callouts on lowcap tokens will be nerfed. We want callouts to incentivize larger wealth effects that affect more people, rather than

1K 347 4K 536K 254

Yeah, this strategy didn't come out of nowhere. The thing is, growth after migration is chaos - it takes much more thorough research and human intervention. Also, I don't sell in one transaction like you said. I sell in parts. But when there's a strong breakout, the parts get combined. I'd love to catch runners after migration, but without extra filtering it's a losing game. Over the long run, exiting at migration beats holding. One day I'll get round to the post-migration data and start catching runners. But for now, I'm sticking with my profitable strategy. You're saying I'm a growth blocker. Tokens with a strong idea don't die from my sells. I'll go further: around 95% of the tokens that reach my take-profit levels go on to migrate. So if 1 token out of 20 didn't make it for some reason, it's most likely not because of me.

@ContextChain @CasualBee0 @devantworld What kind of people? The kind who, like ABSOLUTELY EVERYONE else, wants to make money? 🌝

Most of my trades are either selling at the bottom after everyone else, or holding some dead token for weeks. And I want to make money too. I'm a trader, not a gambling addict. As for those who want me to hold my bag forever - they can keep on wanting 🤭 I can't stop anyone from wanting.

@EricNguyenDu Hold on. Did you think you were going to win every trade? I suggest you find one of my red days and count how many times I got fucked that day =)

Well, I only trade up to migration, so that's just how it turned out. And I said from the start that a decent exit on my CallOuts, without extra analysis, is exiting after migration. I've always been firmly against calls in TG chats and on Twitter. Against copytrading too. I always tried to talk people out of it, because it's a straight path to losing money. But after a couple of evenings running through strategies, I found the threshold where it's safe to make a CallOut - and if the person isn't an idiot and puts in extra work, it won't be for nothing. What I'm getting at: I'd never nudge anyone into anything if I weren't sure it's possible to squeeze value out of it. I try to stay transparent with my followers, and I don't want to wreck my reputation.

Shawn @ShaWhirl

3 days ago

@itzmemewitz I would add. That the focus of many KOLs, the ones on the leader board, has been on the most harmful part, the launch. 🚀 it would last while even dexs don’t get paid, no socials made, no KOL bagwork, it’s all in the launch app. This focus is draining all the little fish fast!

0 0 2 1K 0

@p3degen no =)

This isn't about blindly copying every trade. I'm tired of repeating that and calling that approach out. There are three levels you need to pass before buying a token if you follow me: 1. I buy the token at low cap, $4-6k mcap. This is where most of the rug pulls are. I get absolutely wrecked here. It pays off through my entry price and a high exit. If you copy me here, I'm almost sure it'll be very hard to make it profitable without extra work. 2. After my buy, the token reaches $10-12k mcap and I make a CallOut. There are about 95% fewer rug pulls here. What's left is low-quality tokens and tokens with potential. Buying everything is still risky, but the odds of turning it into a profit are much better than buying right after me. 3. Your own research. My buys are made by a bot running an ML strategy. It doesn't see the chart, socials, or the current market narrative. It only works with numbers. So it often holds tokens that aren't the most reliable. You traders should have a trained eye and a feel for the narrative. If you add that and filter what's left, out of the 20-40 CallOuts I make a day you might actually buy 5, and those will be the ones with potential. Also, I often trade slow tokens - slowcooks. So you have more time for research and entry. You can even start your research from my entry. Just don't buy until it does a 2x. I'm not handing out a money-making strategy. I make money myself, and that's my goal. But along the way, I can point you to potentially good tokens. And I do. If someone can turn that into income - great. If it doesn't work for you - look for another strategy, maybe something of your own. 🫂🫂🫂

Shawn @ShaWhirl

3 days ago

@itzmemewitz The ones that profit most are the lucky ones who sell right after a call out. Very hard to make any gains apeing after a call out, it’s as much of a gamble as waiting for a call out. They should limit how many call KOLS get per day.

0 0 1 1K 0

@EricNguyenDu What are you talking about?

Guys, I disappeared a bit because there's barely time to breathe. I'm curious if anyone buys after my entries. Especially interested in people who buy after CallOuts, or without them, but following my advice: enter a token I'm already in if it reached $10-12k mcap. Happy to hear both the wins and the losses, and what led to them. For now I can say I like the strict CallOut strategy. A lot more people started following, and now I get paid $100 to $400. Not for nothing. Hope I'm not the only one making money off CallOuts, and that it's useful for someone else too. Waiting for feedback 👇 PF: pump.fun/profile/jmemeh…

@Doenarea51 @SimBlockSIMB My 4% didn't stop the token from going to a $30k cap. What usually holds tokens back is a completely different type of trader.

@DeTesFi But that's the easiest part — any AI model can help you with it. 1. I get the data via gRPC. 2. I accumulate the data in a PostgreSQL database. 3. The bot and the parser are written in TS, all focused on execution speed. But Rust would be better.

1000 🫂🫶💚

@bbgm21e8 🤦‍♂️

That sounded something like: "Go dig in the mine, and if you happen to strike gold, give me a shout - I'll come over and you can hand me some..." Are you serious? :) I don't hunt for gems. My bot does the trading. You can follow my callouts on PumpFun and make your own decisions from there. It's a big risk, and all the responsibility is on you.

@Eros100x no

Hey, thanks! I'm afraid simple advice won't help here, and I just can't write everything out in detail. Even when I want to, I really don't have the time. Building a bot is easy, but also really hard. But coming up with a strategy that won't burn through all your money is way harder.